Title: Introduction to Kinship Studies
1Introduction to Kinship Studies
CSU Bakersfield
2OVERVIEW OF TOPICS IN THE STUDY OF FAMILY AND KIN
- Importance of family and kin in social life
- The historical development of kinship studies in
anthropology - Summary points regarding the study of family and
kin
3Importance of family and kin in social life
- The family has been the most important social
unit defining relations between people for most
of human history. It is still so today, even
though we no longer place as much emphasis upon
its importance in the U.S. - It is the only social institution other than
religion that is formally developed in all
societies
4Importance of family and kin in social life
- It is the major unit of socialization that
critically affects how we look at the world,
define ourselves, and form ties and connections
with others - Significance of world view in perceptions of and
meanings attached to the concept of family
5Importance of family and kin
- Variation in the structure and meaning of
family - How do we define what the family is?
- component roles--gender, parental etc - and key
relationships - key functions the family may perform (economic,
socialization, legitimization of offspring,
alliances with like units)
6Importance of family and kin
- Traditional concepts of the family are tied to
the familistic package of functions it has
performed - Global revolution in how we think of ourselves
connections we form - family as a special
relationship - importance of emotional
communication (intimacy) as defining
characteristics.
7Importance of family and kin
- Extensions of kin beyond the family
- Significance of the contrast between a focus on
the individual v.s. the community definition of
the self vs other - Importance of concept of dependency
8Dependency (Gurian Gurian)
- an inborn tendency which cultural, social and
psychological conditions variously shape - seeking support, identity, security and
permission outside the self - is reciprocal a life process, a cycle of
attitudes and actions
9Positive vs negative dependency
- positive - where dependency serves as a
continuing support for adequate, non-victimized
persons their partners, family, community etc
.- a balanced reciprocal flow
10Positive vs negative dependency
- negative - where dependency cripples the ability
of the self to be a constructive contributor to
partnership, family, or community
11Balanced Dependency Features
- continuity--uninterrupted connection
- bonding--significant life-link
- reciprocity--giving receiving, mutual benefit
- obligation--honoring commitments
- trust--emotional knowing of secure bonds
- commitment--supporting others needs
- involvement--taking part in daily roles
12The 21st Century American Family
- how current status of the family is understood is
affected by assumptions regarding its character - assumed universality of the nuclear family
- assumed parental determinism (re socialization
of children) - assumed stable harmonious past
- perception of families in crisis--impact of
triple revolution post industrial service and
informational economy life course changes
psychological gentrification of population
13Summary Points
- People in all societies recognize that they are
connected to others in a variety of ways -- forms
of relatedness - Key forms of relatedness come from shared
substance and its transmission -- bodily
transmission (blood, milk, genetic) or spiritual
(soul, rebirth, nurturance) or both - Kinship -- defines those social relationships
prototypically derived from the universal human
experiences of mating, birth and nurturance
14HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN ANTHROPOLOGY
- Kinship studies have been one of the most
important and well developed areas of social
anthropology. Key theoretical developments - unilineal evolutionists
- structural functionalism
- processual approaches--alliance theory
- ethnosemantics
- dialectical holism
15EARLY EVOLUTIONISTS - MAJOR CONTRIBUTIONS
- First studied by unilineal cultural evolutionists
in the 1800's - McLennan (1865) Lewis Henry
Morgan (1870, 1877) Bachofen (1861). Founded
the study of kinship - Gave us the terminology to study kinship systems
- Pointed out relationships between marriage and
other social institutions
16EARLY EVOLUTIONISTS - MAJOR CONTRIBUTIONS
- Kinship systems do change and there are
regularities in the process - Kinship systems do reflect to some degree, the
type of adaptation to the environment
17PROBLEMS WITH EARLY STUDIES
- Ethnocentric and culturally biased
- Kinship systems are not subject to cumulative
evolution can't be ranked as higher/lower etc. - Different kin systems are just alternate ways of
doing things - Kin terms are NOT just an extension of biological
relations
18STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONALISM
- Major contributors - A. R. Radcliffe Brown and
Bronislaw Malinowski others E.E.
Evans-Prichard, Kroeber, Rivers, Lowie, Murdock - social learning approach to kin terms - way
behavior is learned defines explanation of
behavior itself Kroeber-linguistic approach - concern with kin groups development of descent
theory
19STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONALISM
- static approach - focus on social structure,
rules and obligations, contributions to social
solidarity - kinship terms based on behavior, justified by
Murdocks work (supported R. B.) - Murdock--statistical analysis of kinship systems
via kin terminology - 3 determinants of kin terms (marriage, descent,
residence) descent most important
20PROCESSUAL APPROACH TO KINSHIP
- Raymond Firth - problems with structural
functionalism - focus on social organization, the
change principle, networks important - Levi-Strauss - emphasis on alliance theory - kin
groups based on exchange of food, goods, services
and women. Marriage is an exchange of women
between kin groups - cybernetics - emphasis on kin relations via
mathematical models
21ETHNOSEMANTICS
- emphasis on meaning of kinship from natives
point of view, meaning in context - ethnoscience - look at sociological meaning of
terms to get at nature of kinship system
22DIALECTICAL HOLISM
- Yanagisako Collier - point out need to
re-examine anthropological work in gender and
kinship studies - assumptions about gender lie at core of kin
studies just as ideas about kinship are central
to analyses of gender
23DIALECTICAL HOLISM
- kinship is rooted in biology because, by our own
definition, it is about relationships based in
sexual reproduction (p.30) - we assume that the activities that create human
offspring are heterosexual intercourse,
pregnancy, and parturition and these constitute
the biological process upon which we presume
culture builds social relations such as
marriage, etc. (p.30)
24Yanagisako Collier
- There are no facts, biological or material,
that have social consequences and cultural
meanings in and of themselves. Sexual
intercourse, pregnancy, and parturition are
cultural facts, whose form, consequences and
meanings are socially constructed in any society
as are mothering, fathering, judging, ruling..
Similarly, there are no material facts that can
be treated as precultural givens. (p.39)
25Analyzing Social Wholes - 3 Facets
- cultural analysis of meaning - the socially
meaningful categories people use, symbols
meanings underlying them - systemic models of inequality - how do ordinary
people pursuing own ends realize the structures
of inequality that constrain them - historical analysis - change over time,
dialectical processes thru which practices
meanings have unfolded, affecting present and
future
26Summary Points
- Kinship systems are a response to various
recognized pressures within a framework of
biological, psychological, ecological, and social
limitations -- importance of context - Problem of biases - cultural sexual
(presumptions about gender roles) using folk
concepts of sex etc. as the basis of biological
thus universal differences
27Summary Points
- Note problems of categorization - definition of
what is (now vs. later), kin systems are
constantly evolving - norms vs statistical realities vs emic (native)
definition of realities - It is not what the definition says, but what
people do with those definitions (social uses to
which they are put) that matters
28IMPACT OF SEXUALITY ON FAMILY AND KIN
- Sexuality - means of understanding how
possibilities constraints of biology help shape
family and kin organization - Topics to Be Covered
- Insights from non-human primates
- Impact of culture on sexuality
- Premarital sexual relations restrictions on
them - Variant attitudes toward sexuality and
homosexuality
29Insights from Non-human Primates
- only humans have female-male pair bonding and
multi-male, multi- female groups - continuous female sexual receptivity, rare in
animal world - sex for meat hypothesis (bonobo chimps)
30Impact of Culture on Sexuality
- All cultures channel sexuality and pose
restrictions on who, when, and under what
conditions sexual behavior may be expressed
before marriage, outside of marriage, within
marriage and after marriage - Restrictive rules regarding childhood and
premarital sexual expression correspond to
similar attitudes regarding extramarital and
postmarital sexual expression
31Impact of Culture on Sexuality
- Despite the diversity of cultures, are 2 bases
for commonalities in sexual expression - potentialities limitations of biological
inheritance - the internal logic consistency of a culture
which shapes expression of sexuality in culture
via socialization of young
32Childhood Sexuality
- considerable variation in attitudes expressed
- many have a tolerant attitude toward
masturbation, and even relations between adults
and children - we are born as sexual beings capable of orgasmic
expression - major issue is how adults label such activity
33Premarital Sexual Relations (Frayser)
- more societies allow premarital sex for one or
both sexes than do not - where there are restraints, are more likely to
apply to premarital vs extramarital sex - double standard operates in only one direction
(restrict women more than men)
34Societies with Restrictions on Premarital Sex
- Societies where property and other rights pass
thru males (patrilineal descent) and where
married couples live with or near husband's
parents (e.g. Circum-Mediterranean) - Societies with emphasis on dowry (money and goods
given by bride's family) - Complex, stratified societies likely to restrict
premarital sex
35Variant Attitudes Toward Sexuality
- permissive -- tolerant attitude (Mangaia,
Trobriand Islands) - restrictive -- Inis Beag, very negative attitude
toward all forms of sexual expression
36Attitudes toward Homosexuality
- if permitted for girls, almost always for boys
- are different types of male homosexuality -
institutionalized male bisexuality (Melanesia) - Werner - societies with evidence of population
pressure on resources, reason to limit
reproduction, more likely to tolerate male
homosexuality - mentorship homosexuality part of a larger
syndrome reflecting strong male power and
authority
37Societies Where Sex is Dangerous
- societies where sex is viewed as dangerous, are
often where men fear sex with women are often
coupled with menstral taboos - marrying enemies, emotional distance between
husbands and wives may exaggerate boys
unconscious sexual interest in mother,
frightening because of incest taboo
38IMPACT OF GENDER ON FAMILY KIN
- Biological Influences
- Definition of Terms Regarding Gender
- Factors influencing Sexual Behavior
- Gender Role Identity - Impact of Socialization
- Division of Labor by Gender
- Gender and Contributions to Subsistence
- Status of Women
39Areas of Biological Influence on Gender
- physiology
- emotional characteristics
- mental (visual/spacial perception)
40Biological Influence on Gender
- physiology - Males physically stronger
Females greater endurance, resistance to disease
stress etc. - emotional - Males emphasis on physical
aggressiveness (far more responsible for
incidents of homicide) Females emphasis on
nurturant capabilities
41Biological Influence on Gender
- mental (visual/spacial perception) - Males field
independence, can abstract elements from context,
greater lateralization in brain Females field
dependence, relational emphasis, elements
perceived in context, use both sides of brain
more (related to tight parental control, emphasis
on conformity
42Biological Influence on Gender
- Feedback between biological processes and the
environment is extremely complex, is a moot
question as to where biology leaves off and
culture begins emphasis is on significance of
socio-cultural factors.
43Definition of Terms Regarding Gender
- core gender identity
- secure sense of maleness or femaleness, affected
by cultural interpretations, being comfortable w/
one's body usually well established by age 3
(18-36 months requires internalization of
cultural rules defining gender)
44Definition of Terms Regarding Gender
- gender role
- learned behavior patterns defined by society and
subject to change over time and space
(characterized by masculinity and femininity) - gender role identity
- identification with those behavioral expectations
considered appropriate for a given gender
45Understanding Sexual Behavior, Key Factors
- Individual gender role identity - perception of
what it means to be male or female in a society
and how that perception is reflected in behavior
- degree to which gender roles constrain
individual behavior - Nature of the relationship between the sexes -
interpretation of attributes of gender roles,
activities carried out by each sex, attitudes
toward males by females vice versa
46Key Factors in Understanding Sexual Behavior
- Socio-cultural context - how interpretation of
sexual identity and the relations between sexes
are expressed in different arenas of life and in
terms of norms of society importance of kinship,
separation of public and domestic spheres of
activity as well as socio-historical forces
affecting norms etc.
47Components of Socio-cultural Context
- Ecosystem - type of ecological adaptation (
technology) associated degree of societal
complexity - Socio-economic and political organization -
differentiation relative importance of public
vs domestic sphere type of family kinship
system, type of status groups present, etc
relative gender role differentiation present and
importance
48Components of Socio-cultural Context
- Role of ideology (values norms) - evaluation of
sexuality is based on cultural perception -
herein lies the importance of attitudes which are
instilled via socialization
49Development of Gender Role Identity
- There are a number of cross-cultural
similarities in the socialization personality
development of females vs males (based on article
by Chodorow in Rosaldo Lamphere, 1974, Woman,
Culture and Society)
50Cross-Cultural Similarities in Socialization
- Females activity and manners acquired in natural
continuity Males taught to be men,
discontinuous role, separation from domestic
sphere necessary in order to learn role - Females integrated w/ female kin vertically
(mo-da) Males integrated horizontally,
importance of peer relationships in childhood
activities
51Cross-Cultural Similarities in Socialization
- Females membership in groups not questioned -
age determines status (ascribed) Males
membership in groups achieved and open to
question, based on personal characteristics
52Cross-Cultural Similarities in Socialization
- Females growing up, experience others as
individuals, emphasis is on informal roles (have
flexible ego boundaries) - roles defined in
relation to domestic sphere Males learn manhood
as an abstract set of rights and duties, status
brings formal authority, emphasis is on formal
institutional roles (public roles)
53Cross-Cultural Similarities in Socialization
- Similarities in socialization of females vs males
reflected in puberty rites - note three stages in all rites of passage -
separation, transition, incorporation - rites are usually more public, more marked, more
severe and more important for males than for
females.
54Division of Labor by Gender
- male strength theory
- compatibility with child care theory
- economy of effort theory
- expendability theory
55Gender and Contributions to Subsistence
- need to consider primary (food getting-gathering,
hunting, fishing, herding, agriculture)and
secondary (food preparation and processing
subsistence activities - calories - men usually contribute more
- total work time including processing in home - in
horticultural and intensive agricultural
societies women work more hours per day than men
56Gender and Contributions to Subsistence
- women contribute as much as men to primary
subsistence in many agricultural and especially
horticultural societies - contribution to primary subsistence and nature of
child care, closely linked - where women contribute more to subsistence, more
say about aspects of their sexuality
57Gender and Contributions to Subsistence
- political roles and leadership patterns - male
political power may stem partially from male
predominance in war (strength, compatibility and
expendability theories) - increase in societal complexity reflected in less
formal leadership for women emphasis on informal
roles, indirect influence
58Status of Women
- At best women are more or less equal to men, in
no known society do women clearly have more
status than men - Whyte - 52 cultural traits affecting status -
staus is multidimensional, high status in one
area does not mean high status in another
59Predictors of Status of Women
- female-centered social structure (matrilineality
and matrilocality) - more control over property,
more authority in home more equal sexual
restrictions, more value attributed to lives - level of societal complexity - greater complexity
(e.g., intensive agriculture) lower status.