The WSU LC R - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The WSU LC R

Description:

216 wafers (bi-directional drift) = 432 hybrids ... 6 by 6 cm active area = max. 3 cm drift, 3 mm (inactive) guard area ... cause a 10% drift velocity variation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: sanjeev53
Category:
Tags: wsu | drift

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The WSU LC R


1
The WSU LC RD program
Rene Bellwied, Dave Cinabro, Vladimir Rykov
Wayne State University
  • Who are we ?
  • What have we done ?
  • What would we like to do ?
  • Hardware and Software

2
The WSU LC RD program
  • Mix of NSF funded HE group and DoE funded Nuclear
    group
  • Interest application of Silicon technologies to
    large area solid state tracking.
  • Group was funded by Prescott Committee and NSF in
    the past two years to conduct LC RD. Vladimir
    was partially funded by this grant.
  • Nuclear group designed, constructed, installed
    and operates the STAR-SVT (7 Million project, 50
    people from 9 institutions, project started in
    1993 and was completed in 2001, Rene Bellwied was
    project leader throughout this time.
    Collaborating institutions BNL, LBNL, Ohio
    State, University of Texas in Austin, Sao Paulo,
    Dubna, Protvino, Warsaw University)

3
The SVT in STAR
Construction in progress
Connecting components
4
The SVT in STAR (Feb.2001)
The final device.
and all its connections
5
STAR-SVT characteristics
  • 216 wafers (bi-directional drift) 432 hybrids
  • 3 barrels, r 5, 10, 15 cm, 103,680 channels,
    13,271,040 pixels
  • 6 by 6 cm active area max. 3 cm drift, 3 mm
    (inactive) guard area
  • max. HV 1500 V, max. drift time 5 ms, (TPC
    drift time 50 ms)
  • anode pitch 250 mm, cathode pitch 150 mm
  • SVT cost 7M for 0.7m2 of silicon (3 year RD, 5
    year construction)
  • Radiation length 1.4 per layer
  • 0.3 silicon, 0.5 FEE (Front End Electronics),
  • 0.6 cooling and support. Beryllium support
    structure.
  • FEE placed beside wafers. Water cooling.

6
SDDs 3-d measuring devices(a solid state TPC)
7
A typical pattern on a hybrid for a
central Au-Au event
  • central event inner layer 15 hits/hybrid
    (middle 8 hits, outer 5 hits)
  • overall track multiplicity 1000/event

8
Typical SDD Resolution
9
Wafers B and T dependence
  • Operated at B6T in E896 at the AGS. B fields
    parallel to drift increase the resistance and
    slow the drift velocity.
  • The detectors work well up to 50oC but are also
    very T-dependent. T-variations of 0.10C cause a
    10 drift velocity variation
  • Detectors are operated at room temperature in
    STAR.
  • We monitor these effect via MOS charge injectors

10
Present status of technology
  • STAR (completed in 2001)
  • 4in. NTD material, 3 kWcm, 280 mm thick, 6.3 by
    6.3 cm area
  • 250 mm readout pitch, 61,440 pixels per detector
  • SINTEF produced 250 good wafers (70 yield)
  • ALICE (to be completed in 2006)
  • 6in. NTD material, 2 kWcm, 280 mm thick, 280 mm
    pitch
  • CANBERRA produced around 100 prototypes, good
    yield
  • Future (NLC)
  • 6in. NTD, 150 micron thick, any pitch between
    200-400 mm
  • 10 by 10 cm wafer

11
Silicon detector option for LCD
Central tracker Silicon Drift DetectorsFive
layers Radiation length / layer 0.5
sigma_rphi 7 mm, sigma_rz 10
mm             Layer Radii    Half-lengths
            -----------    ------------
             20.00 cm      26.67 cm
             46.25 cm        61.67 cm
             72.50 cm        96.67 cm
             98.75 cm       131.67 cm
            125.00 cm       166.67 cm 56 m2
Silicon Wafer size 10 by 10 cm of Wafers
6000 (incl. spares) of Channels 4,404,480
channels (260 mm pitch)        
12
Tracking efficiencies LD vs. SD
  • Tracking efficiencies
  • For 100 hit efficiency (95.30.13)
  • For 98 hit efficiency (94.50.14)
  • For 90 hit efficiency (89.50.20)
  • ? LD ?
  • ? SD ?
  • Tracking efficiencies
  • For 100 hit efficiency (97.30.10)
  • For 98 hit efficiency (96.60.12)
  • For 90 hit efficiency (92.70.16)

13
Momentum studies (LD / SD)
LD ?
SD ?
log10(Pt, GeV/c)
log10(Pt, GeV/c)
14
Missing and ghost energies
  • For hit efficiency 100
  • Missing energy (11.70.6) GeV
  • (7.10.3)
  • Ghost energy (19.60.8) GeV
  • (13.10.6)
  • ? LD ?
  • ? SD ?
  • For hit efficiency 100
  • Missing energy (5.70.4) GeV
  • (3.30.2)
  • Ghost energy (4.80.4) GeV
  • (2.90.2)

15
Preliminary conclusions
  • Momentum resolution
  • The SD option has slightly better resolution at
    high momentum and slightly worse resolution at
    low momentum compared to LD
  • With the existing 3d tracking and pattern
    recognition software (Mike Ronan et al.) the SD
    option has a slight advantage in tracking
    efficiency, shows less missing and ghost energy,
    and less ghost tracks)

16
Track Timing at ee- Linear Collider with the
Silicon Drift Detector Main TrackerR. Bellwied,
D. Cinabro, V. L. RykovWayne State
University,Detroit, Michigan
Chicago LC Workshop, Chicago, Illinois, January
7-9, 2002 V. L.
Rykov, Wayne State University
17
Conclusion of track-timing study(hep-ex/0202030,
submitted to NIM)
 
  • It is shown that, with the SDD based central
    Main Tracker for the detector at ee- Linear
    Collider, the track selection and timing is
    possible at the nanosecond and even
    sub-nanosecond level.
  • This means that, even at the NLC and/or JLC with
    the bunch spacing at 1.4 ns, each high-PT track
    can be assigned to a particular bunch crossing at
    the confidential level of up to 2?.
  • For the considered here 5-layer central Main
    Tracker, it is suggested to make layers 1, 2, 3
    and 5 drifting along z-axis, but layer 4 drifting
    along the azimuth (?-axis) with effectively no
    negative impact on the trackers momentum
    resolution. In other words, all the above is just
    for free with the SDD Main Tracker.

Chicago LC Workshop, Chicago, Illinois, January
7-9, 2002 V. L.
Rykov, Wayne State University
18
RD for Large Tracker Application
  • Improve position resolution to 5mm
  • Decrease anode pitch from 250 to 100mm.
  • Stiffen resistor chain and drift faster.
  • Improve radiation length
  • Reduce wafer thickness from 300mm to 150mm
  • Move FEE to edges or change from hybrid to SVX
  • Air cooling vs. water cooling
  • Use 6in instead of 4in Silicon wafers to reduce
    channels.
  • More extensive radiation damage studies.
  • Detectors/FEE can withstand around 100 krad (g,n)
  • PASA is BIPOLAR (intrinsically rad. hard.)
  • SCA can be produced in rad. hard process.

19
WSU RD interests
  • Main goal develop either full scale tracker or
    intermediate tracking layer on the basis of
    Silicon Drift technology.
  • Projects
  • Hardware
  • 1.) design new prototype drift detector layout
    (incl. frontend stage) optimized for LC use
    (i.e. larger detector, higher pitch, higher
    voltage, less power consumption)
  • 2.) collaborate with BNL on prototype production
    of wafer and frontend chip
  • Software
  • 1.) optimize 3d tracking code for solid state
    tracker, compare performance to gas detector and
    other silicon technologies
  • 2.) write slow simulator for detector response
    and apply STAR tracking and pattern recognition
  • 3.) find unique drift detector applications (e.g.
    track timing)

20
WSU proposal for the next 3 years (50 K per
project per year)
  • In collaboration with the Instrumentation
    division at BNL
  • 1.) design and produce a prototype batch (20)
    of new, optimized Silicon drift detectors. The
    proposed major changes compared to the old STAR
    design are
  • a.) increase the detector size by using six inch
    rather than four inch wafers
  • b.) increase the readout pitch in order to
    reduce the channel count
  • c.)  thin the wafer from 300 micron to 150
    micron
  • d.) operate wafers at higher voltage (up to 2500
    V) to accommodate new drift length
  • 2.) design and produce a new prototype of a CMOS
    based frontend chip.
  • a.)    use deep sub-micron technology to improve
    radiation hardness
  • b.)    reduce power consumption to allow
    air-cooling of the detector
  • c.)    potentially include the ADC stage into
    the PASA/SCA design
  • d.)    test tape automated bonding rather than
    wire-bonding 

21
WSU proposal (cont.)
  • 3.) we also propose to investigate a design for
    the mechanical support of the Silicon ladders
    based on a design used for the Silicon Strip
    detector layer in STAR.  
  • 4.) software efforts
  • a.)continue our comparative study of the
    performance of a Silicon drift detector based
    main tracker with the existing tracking and
    pattern recognition code...
  • b.)provide a full GEANT based geometry
    definition of our proposed tracker before the
    fall of 2002.
  • c.)port a detector response code from STAR into
    the LC simulation framework.
  • d.)adapt a code recently written by a WSU led
    software group for STAR which allows track
    matching between the two main tracking detectors
    in STAR and the electro-magnetic calorimeter in
    STAR. An integrated tracking code (IT) can be
    applied to the SD design in order to
    simultaneously analyze the information from the
    vertex detector, the main tracker and the
    calorimeter.

22
Whats next for SDD ?
  • The project has to grow, we need more groups
    interested in SDD (as of now only WSU and BNL
    expressed some interest).
  • Prototype detectors for use in test setups at
    universities or other National Labs are available
    through WSU/BNL.
  • People with mask design skills could work on new
    prototype layouts.
  • The wafer and frontend electronics RD could be
    split in two projects.
  • What should the frontend be DSM-CMOS, bipolar,
    different chips for different stages or single
    chip, implanted or wire-bonded ?
  • Readout electronics and DAQ integration have not
    been addressed at all.
  • Software development and simulations needs a lot
    more manpower. Talk to us if youre interested
    (bellwied_at_physics.wayne.edu)
  • Check out the web at http//rhic15.physics.wayne.
    edu/bellwied/nlc

23
Simulation framework
B 5 T
B 3 T
144 layers
24
Simulation Studies
  • Momentum resolution
  • Present 20 mm pos.res., 1.5 rad.length/layer,
    Beampipe wall thickness 2 mm
  • Future 5 mm pos.res., 0.5 rad.length/layer,
    Beampipe wall thickness 0.5 mm
  • Two Track Resolution.
  • Present 500 mm
  • Future 200 mm

25
Track time stamping with the SDD (intrinsic)
  • Correct timing
  • Hit positions are determined correctly, and
    fit to a track with a good ?2.
  • Wrong timing with some hit SDDs drifting in the
    opposite directions to the others (probability
    15/16th93.75)
  • Hit positions are determined incorrectly, and
    do not fit to a track, i.e. ?2 is bad.
  • Wrong timing with all hit SDDs drifting the same
    direction (probability1/16th6.25)
  • Hit positions are determined incorrectly, but
    still fit to a shifted track with a good ?2.

Chicago LC Workshop, Chicago, Illinois, January
7-9, 2002 V. L.
Rykov, Wayne State University
26
Simulation Studies (cont.)
  • Momentum resolution
  • Modify Position Resolution
  • Modify Radiation length Si thickness,
    Electronics
  • Modify Beam Pipe Wall Thickness

27
Track time stamping with the TPC
  • It is recognized that, if the time stamping for
    the tracks in the TPC or SDD is not done, it
    could seriously impact the detector performance,
    particularly its missing mass resolution.
  • Sorting out tracks, using the Main Tracker only
    is always the most desirable option.
  • The suggested solution for the TPC was to place,
    at some TPC depth, fast intermediate tracker,
    made from scintillating fibers and/or silicon
    intermediate tracking layer inside the TPC.
  • (Physics Resource Book, 2001)

Chicago LC Workshop, Chicago, Illinois, January
7-9, 2002 V. L.
Rykov, Wayne State University
28
Various drift axis combinations in MT layers
Impact on PT-resolution ?anode 7 ?m ?drift
10 ?m
  • In the options z?z?z (the best for time
    stamping), momentum resolution at high PT
    deteriorates by 10, compared to zzzzz (the best
    for PT resolution).
  • There is virtually no worsening of momentum
    resolution for zzz?z drift.

Chicago LC Workshop, Chicago, Illinois, January
7-9, 2002 V. L.
Rykov, Wayne State University
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com