Implementation of EC law - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Implementation of EC law

Description:

Effect of annulment great. Implementation EC law. Directives: binding as to result (art 249) But ... Precise transposition necessary to achieve uniform ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: nilm
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Implementation of EC law


1
Implementation of EC law
  • Regulations, decisions
  • directly applicable
  • But
  • May require further MS regulation
  • Therefore comes into force on the 3rd day but
    applies 15 months later
  • Create direct effects
  • Effect of annulment great

2
Implementation EC law
  • Directives
  • binding as to result (art 249)
  • But
  • Precise transposition necessary to achieve
    uniform application over all MSs
  • Not every provision
  • All provisions creating rights and obligations
    for individuals
  • May be implied
  • All parts of transposing legislation must be
    binding
  • Comm v Germany TA Luft 361/88, 59/89
  • All national provisions must be notified
  • Comm v Germany Bundesnaturschutzgesetz

3
Enforcement EC env law
  • Initially up to MS
  • ECJ has provided min requirements
  • Proportionate, effective, dissuasive penalties
    (not symbolic)
  • MSs must have system of state liability
  • Francovich
  • Few EC measures contain enforcement methods
  • Therefore MS enforcement methods differ
    significantly
  • ECJ MSs owe an env result
  • Comm v UK Blackpool case (p 52-61)
  • Commission may start infringement proceedings

4
Enforcement - direct effect of EC env law
  • Van Gend C 26/62
  • Must be unconditional, sufficiently precise
  • Not always necessary to show that substantive
    rights have been affected
  • Kraaijeveld C 72/95
  • Primary Treaty law
  • Arts. 25, 28, 29, 30, 81, 82, 90

5
Enforcement - direct effect
  • Directives
  • Once transposed
  • Product standards - yes
  • Ratti C 148/78
  • Minimum harmonisation measures, eg emission
    standards - yes
  • Framework directives no
  • Lombardia waste case C236/92
  • Discretion directives- maybe
  • WWF v Bolzano C 435/97
  • Pp 61-62, 63-64, 67-71

6
Direct effect
  • Direct effect and state liability
  • Francovich
  • Sufficiently serious breach
  • Must confer rights on individual
  • Causal link
  • No horizontal direct effect
  • Indirect effect
  • Little third party protection against EC env
    measures

7
Direct effect and criminal law
  • Pp 79-87 C 168/95

8
State aid and env
  • ECT Arts 87-88
  • What is aid?
  • Direct grants
  • Indirect tax relief, subsidies
  • MS must notify Commission (art 88(3))
  • MS must show benefit to env
  • From public resources
  • Only prohibited if distorts trade
  • Guiding principle polluter pays art 174(2)

9
State aid and env
  • Commission guidelines 2002-2007
  • Investment aid
  • To comply with new env standards, up to 15 of
    total
  • Cartiere della Garda L273/51
  • Training/consultancy re increasing env awareness
  • Operating aid
  • Waste management, energy saving, tax exemptions
  • Temporary, degressive
  • All limited
  • Funds available
  • Structural funds (Reg 2052/88)
  • Life (Reg 1973/92)
  • Cohesion fund (art 161 ECT)

10
Environmental taxes
  • art 90 ECT no direct/indirect taxation in XS of
    domestic
  • No discrimination
  • Comm v Italy C 21/79 re regenerated oil
  • Outokumpu Oy C213/96 (pp120-127 Kr)
  • Env protection legitimate for tax differentiation
    but no discrimination
  • This hinders trade
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com