Title: University of Washington EMBA Program Regional 20
1University of Washington EMBA ProgramRegional 20
- The Case of the Complaining Customer
-
- TA Rory McLeod
-
2The Case of the Complaining Customer
- Background
- Decision Maker Presto Cleaner President J.W.
Sewickley - Recently received information on a service
failure - Customer George Shelton
- Angry!!!
- Not very fond of new order systems performance
from the start (3 for each bag, longer wait,
service provider unfamiliarity with the new
system) - Presto lost (and later found) shirts he submitted
for cleaning - Feels like he got the run around/no empathy
from Paul Hoffner Presto Management or the
current complaint resolution system - After 9 day wait he bought 4 new shirts
- Eventually another customerhaving inadvertently
picked up the wrong orderreturned his 4 shirts - Still has not heard from Presto as of October 8
(originally tried to pick up his 4 shirts on
August 10)
3The Case of the Complaining Customer
- Background (cont.)
- Presto Manager Paul Hoffner
- Feels like he made a good faith effort
- Considers circumstances to be highly mitigating
factors - Customer has outright lied about some key facts
- Willing to play the fall guy
4The Case of the Complaining Customer
- Mr. Sewickley has 2 decisions to make
- Fix the problem?
- Customer
- Assess and fix the system?
- Employee
- Operations System
- Corporate Culture
5Case of the Complaining Customer
- Fixing the Problem To Keep or Not To Keep
Customer? - Costs vs. benefits to Presto
- Value of Customer
- Compensation needed/given to keep customer (if
any)
6Assumes discount rate of 10.
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10Case of the Complaining CustomerBuilding a
Defection Tree
SERVICE ENCOUNTER
P1
Satisfied
Dissatisfied
a
c
b
Do not Complain
Complain to Management
Complain to Employee
P2
P3
P4
Unhappy, Leave
Unresolved, Leave
Unresolved, Leave
Stay, but Unhappy
Resolved, Stay
Resolved, Stay
Customers Lost (P1)(a)(P2) (P1)(b)(P3) (
P1)(c)(P4) negative word of mouth
11Case of the Complaining CustomerBuilding a
Defection Tree
SERVICE ENCOUNTER
.90
P1.10
Satisfied
Dissatisfied
.60
.05
.35
Do not Complain
Complain to Management
Complain to Employee
P2.50
P3.50
P4.30
.50
.70
. 50
Unhappy, Leave
Unresolved, Leave
Unresolved, Leave
Resolved, Stay
Resolved, Stay
Stay, but Unhappy
Customers Lost .03 .0175 .0015 4.9,
excluding negative word of mouth Lost observed
by Management 0.15 3 of Total Lost For
every customer Management loses, there are 33
more out there (x 1.5 negative w.o.m)!!!
12Key Learnings
- A substantial portion of the customers true
value to the organization can stem from
referrals, network effects, and reduced service
costs that are not part of basic LTV
calculations - Informed decision makers tradeoff the costs and
benefits of service recovery, and they learn from
mistakes - Customers who complain are typically desperate to
do business with your organization - Customers will typically hold your organization
responsible for their entire experience (whether
you think youre responsible or not) - Coordinate points of contact to send a consistent
message
13Key Learnings
- Its usually best to keep customers informed, even
when the news is bad - Emotion plays a huge role in customer assessments
of service quality. Keeping customers in the
dark risks making things worse. - In addition to assessing whether or not to fix
the problem, good marketing managers will check
to see whether or not the system needs fixing as
well
14Thank You!