WINPST 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

WINPST 3

Description:

... pesticides and soils types for leaching, solution runoff and adsorbed runoff ... Prevalence of OM will help bind pesticides (adsorb) and inhibits leachability ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:127
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: joshsp
Category:
Tags: winpst | adsorb

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WINPST 3


1
WIN--PST 3
  • Predicting the mobility of pesticides over and
    through agricultural soils is primarily dependent
    on two things, how tightly they bind to soils and
    how long they last.
  • Linker WeberNC State University
  • WIN-PST is a tool developed by NRCS to assess
    RISK involved with the interaction of known soils
    and pesticides.
  • Evaluates the potential for pesticides to move
    with water and eroded particulate matter

2
WIN--PST 3
  • Soil organic matter ( OM), clay content ( CL),
    and pH are major components that determine
    binding and pesticide mobility in soils

3
WIN--PST 3
  • The NC Ag Chemicals Manual (Tables 2-2 and 2-3 in
    the 2005 Edition) gives separates indices on
    Pesticide Leaching Potential (PLP) for specific
    active ingredients (ie glyphosate) AND Soil
    Leaching Potential (SLP) for SE US soils. Table
    2-4 gives a Groundwater Contamination Potential
    (GWCP) based on cross-reference of these ratings.

4
WIN--PST 3
  • WIN-PST gives non-numeric ratings that assess the
    INTERACTION between pesticides and soils types
    for leaching, solution runoff and adsorbed runoff
  • WIN--PST ratings for ILP (leaching potential),
    ISRP (soil runoff potential), and IARP (adsorbed
    runoff potential) range from LOW to EXTRA HIGH..

5
WIN--PST 3
  • .AND gives those ratings for both human hazard
    and fish hazard potentials (groundwater and
    surface water)

6
WIN--PST 3
  • WINPST 3 was released in November 2005CCE
    Approved!
  • Many improvements over previous versions.how
    could you doubt this? What are these so-called
    improvements?

7
WIN--PST 3
  • New easier to use interfacemodeled after
    Nutrient Management Software..just kidding
  • Brand new Queue feature allows users to select
    and save soils, pesticides and soil/pesticide
    combinations.
  • Users can see interaction ratings real time
    without having to create a report.
  • Reports can be saved as MS Word and Acrobat pdf
    documents for easier printing and management.
  • Results can now be exported directly to an MS
    Excel format for easier incorporation into
    automated worksheets.
  • Takes soils directly from the SSURGO Access
    Template (SSURGO Version 2.1 format).

8
WINPST 3
  • Believe it or not, there are still some issues to
    be resolved.
  • Soils with High Water Tables and High OM remain
    troublesome.(especially relevant in Coastal
    Plain). Prevalence of OM will help bind
    pesticides (adsorb) and inhibits leachability

9
WIN--PST 3
  • WIN-PST may overestimate the influence of High
    Water Table on pesticide movements. These soils
    are noted with a (w) in WIN-PST. Just because
    there is a High WT doesnt mean that a pesticide
    is going to leach!
  • In soils that have high OM (gt3), the high water
    table may be deactivated in WIN-PST Select
    Soils screen

10
WIN--PST 3
  • This issue is clarified in the 595 standard (yes,
    you actually need to read the standard.)
  • High water table may also be deactivated if site
    has been drainedthere are also other conditions
  • This has to be manually done in WIN-PST
    (sorry)but hazard ratings are adjusted
    accordingly

11
WIN--PST 3
  • Most important report is WIN-PST Soil/Pesticide
    Interaction Loss Potential and Hazard Ratings
    Report (or the easily remembered WPSPILPHRR)
  • This report gives you the bottom linepesticide
    loss potentials and human fish hazard ratings
    (ground and surface water)

12
WIN--PST 3
  • Whats the point of the rating?
  • Well, according to standard 595, there are
    mitigation techniques that can lessen the impact
    of pesticide loss through any of the loss
    pathways (leaching, solution, or adsorbed)

13
WIN--PST 3
  • The WIN-PST ratings tell us, according to the 595
    standard, how many (IF ANY) mitigation techniques
    are required.
  • Examples LOWAdditional mitigation practices
    may not be required
  • EXTRA HIGHMitigation techniques may not work
    without changing pesticide selection

14
WIN--PST 3
  • I want to rush back and run many WIN-PST
    scenarios. How do I get it?
  • NRCS National Water and Climate Center website
    www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/pestmgt/winpst.html

15
WIN--PST 3
  • Where do I get soils data for my county?
  • FOTG Sec II (LOOK ON YOUR F OR C DRIVES
  • If not there now, go to the Soil Data Mart and
    download.
  • WIN-PST takes soils from SSURGO soils databaseI
    can email you instructions on loading these soils
    into WIN-PST
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com