Title: Foreign exchange reserve management practices: trends and challenges
1Foreign exchange reserve management practices
trends and challenges
- by
- Claudio Borio, Gabriele Galati, and Alexandra
Heath - Bank for International Settlements, Basel
- Closing lecture at the third conference on
Foreign exchange reserves and the international
monetary system Genoa and beyond - Genoa, 27-28 March 2008
The views expressed are those of the authors
and not necessarily those of the BIS.
2Questions and methodology
- How has RM evolved?
- What have been the main drivers?
- What are the key challenges?
- focus on market functioning
- Ad hoc survey for a central bank (CB) meeting at
the BIS - end-06 (mid-07)
- 80 of world reserves
1
3Backdrop
- Unprecedented accumulation of FX reserves in
recent years - alongside major changes in reserve management
(RM) practices - Some changes are well-known others less
- Definition of RM
- Allocation of FX reserves across currencies and
asset classes for a given net FX position
2
4Key points trends and drivers
- Trend towards convergence to asset management
processes in the private sector - greater attention to return alongside more
structured decision-making (upgrading of internal
external governance) - Drivers
- country-specific
- accumulation of reserves
- more general
- changes in the financial landscape
- changes in the institutional landscape
3
5Key points challenges and market functioning
- Key challenges owing to central bank specificity
- defining the appropriate risk-return trade-off
- choice of numeraire
- how much disclosure
- can have a significant impact on market
functioning - tension between return-seeking and public-good
responsibilities - future of the dollar as reserve currency
- market volatility/arbitrage opportunities
4
6Trend 1 increased focus on returns
- Broader universe of investable assets (Table 1)
- longer duration, spread products (Graph 1)
- corporate credits and equities
- less gold (G. 2)
- Increased use of derivatives
- Increased use of external managers (T. 2)
- Tranching of portfolio
- liquidity and investment tranches
- Establishment of separate SWFs (T. 3)
- but not net wealth!
7Trend 2 more structured decision-making
- Shift towards a top-down approach
- importance of executive level
- defines Strategic Asset Allocation, SAA (T. 4)
- defines management style
- Greater vertical tiering (T. 4)
- creation of Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA) layer
- Greater horizontal separation of activities (T.
5) - to limit conflicts of interest
6
8Trend 3 strengthened risk management
- Market risk (T. 6)
- largest part is unavoidable (FX risk)
- but tighter management ex ante ex post
- greater sophistication of tools
- Credit risk (T. 7)
- primarily because of reputational risk (avoid a
credit event) - ratings key own analysis balance-sheet
constraints - Operational risk (T. 8)
- greater centralisation and formalisation
7
9Trend 4 increased public disclosure
- About institutional structure/processes (T. 9)
- common across CBs
- About eligible asset classes (T. 9)
- for a majority of CBs
- About currency allocation (T. 9)
- for only a few
8
10Driver 1 unprecedented accumulation of reserves
- Sense that reserves exceed adequacy measures
(T. 10) - has influenced the various trends
- need for liquidity pressure from body politic
? return - return ? internal discipline risk management
- demands for accountability ? internal
external governance (including disclosure)
9
11Driver 2 developments of financial markets and
technology
- financial know-how ? availability of tools
- enabled transition to more structured
decision-making - Developments of markets ? improve trade-offs
- liquidity for given return
- derivatives ? flexibility
10
12Driver 3 the external governance environment
- Trend towards greater CB operational independence
- demands for accountability and transparency ?
internal governance disclosure - Keener recognition of importance of credibility
and reputation for effective policy-making - risk management sensitivity to reputational
risk - more favourably disposed towards disclosure
11
13Challenge 1 what risk-return balance?
- No obvious criteria for choosing
- CBs are multifunctional public sector
institutions - RM not to interfere/ to support macro and
financial stability objectives - special lens for gains losses is the source of
an apparent conservative bias
12
14Challenge 1 (ctd) implications
- Losses
- mainly concerned with reputation independence
- importance of accounting, income distribution/
recapitalisation rules, relationship to body
politic - Gains
- matters how gains are achieved ? reputation
- inhibit investments in certain asset classes
- inhibit active trading strategies that could
destabilise markets - Defining the economic (? pecuniary) opportunity
cost of the reserves - need for a general equilibrium analysis
- typical misconceptions
- casts the need to raise yield in a different
light
13
15Challenge 1 (ctd) future prospects
- Other things equal, trend toward higher risk
tolerance may well continue - Implication 1
- support relocation of reserves out of CB balance
sheets - Implication 2
- for CBs, tensions between competing objectives
- but may actually potential tensions between
sovereign states
14
16Challenge 2 which numeraire?
- Key decision highlighted by formalisation of the
process - It defines the unit of account for returns and
risks for RM purposes - can and often does differ from unit for
accountingreports - Ultimately to be derived from objective function
- what are the reserves for?
- how do they impact on the other CB functions?
- Some examples
- intervention ? most liquid currency
- import hedging ? import baskets
- liability hedging ? composition liabilities
- wealth maximisation ? domestic currency
(imperfect) - accounting-loss minimisation ? domestic currency
17Challenge 2 implications
- Numeraire has first-order impact on currency
allocation - tilts it heavily towards the currency (basket)
that replicates the numeraire - minimisation of volatility for given return
- If the domestic currency is the numeraire ?
importance of the exchange rate regime - against which currency (basket) is the domestic
currency more stable?
18Challenge 2 (ctd) implications
- Apparent greater use of domestic currency as
numeraire could continue - (imperfect) proxy for wealth maximisation
- CB independence public scrutiny
- sensitivity to accounting losses
- IFRS?
- Resistance to switch away from dollar as
reserve currency - intervention role, exchange rate regime
- especially if currencies asked to flexibility
vis-Ã -vis dollar
19Challenge 3 how much public disclosure?
- Nature of external governance arrangements
- highly country-specific
- institutional, legal, cultural
- Assessment of the impact of disclosure on
effectiveness of RM and other CB functions - depends on trade-off between
- efficiency-enhancing effects of more information
to the market - loss of tactical room for manoeuvre
- is more amenable to purely economic
considerations - exchange rate regime
- size of the reserves
20Challenge 3 prospects
- Not obvious how disclosure will develop
- external pressures to disclose vs.
- or continued reluctance given the size of the
reserves - role of FX regime evolution
21Conclusion
- Major evolution of RM practices
- return-oriented, structured decision-making,
disclosure - convergence but considerable differences remain
- Several drivers
- accumulation of reserves
- development of markets and financial know-how
- independence accountability of CBs
-
22Conclusion (Ctd)
- Unresolved challenges remain
- choice of risk-return balance
- choice of numeraire
- choice of disclosure
- and their resolution can have a significant
impact on market functioning - tension between individually profitable actions
market stability - future of dollar as reserve currency