Title: Modeling Human Reasoning About MetaInformation
1Modeling Human Reasoning About Meta-Information
- Presented By
- Scott Langevin
- Jingsong Wang
2Introduction
- Human decision-making in real-time, dynamic
environments is becoming more complex - Decision-makers must manage large amounts of
incoming information and integrate it with
previous knowledge to develop a situational
awareness - Relies on domain-knowledge but also on the
qualifiers (meta-information) describing the
information - Problem To replicate human reasoning or
behavior, need to model both information and
meta-information - Most approaches have focused on representing the
information, but little discussion of the
meta-information
3What is Meta-Information?
- Definitions
- Data is output from a system that may or may not
be useful to decision-making (radar reports storm
is coming) - Information is recognized inputs that are useable
to decision-making (storm is coming that may
affect UAVs) - Meta-data is qualifiers of data that may or may
not be useful to decision-making (radar can
locate aircraft with error of /-1.5m) - Meta-information is qualifiers of information
that affect decision-making, reasoning, or
behavior - Information processing
- Situation awareness
- Decision-making
- Definitions serve to explicitly identify the
critical role of meta-information in human
decision-making
4Human Behavioral Models
- Attempt to replicate human cognitive processes
- Attempt to model human behaviors must capture the
impact of meta-information - HBM have wide variety of applications
- Developing and testing theories of human
cognition - Representing realistic human behavior in training
- Expert and Decision Support Systems
- Modelers typically do not address
meta-information because of challenges acquiring,
aggregating and integrating - Focus of this research is on modeling
meta-information in Bayesian Belief Networks
(BBNs)
5Uncertainty and Human Decision-Making
- Human decision-making under uncertainty deviates
from logical decision-making and largely based on
experience-based heuristic methods - Often the heuristics represent how experts reason
about the meta-information - Uncertainty of information is one type of
meta-information - Different methods of classifying uncertainty
- Executional uncertainty
- Goal uncertainty
- Environment uncertainty
- Lack of information, etc
- While these classifications of uncertainty and an
understanding of their impacts on decision-making
have been useful, they may not generalize to
other types of meta-information not based on
uncertainty (recency, reliability, trust)
6Computational Approaches to Uncertainty
- Probability Measures
- DempsterShafer belief functions
- Extensions to first-order logic (e.g., defeasible
reasoning, argumentation) - Ranking functions
- plausibility measures
- Fuzzy set theory
- Causal network methods (e.g., Bayesian belief
networks, similarity networks, influence
diagrams)
7Types and Sources of Meta-Information
- Identified the main types of meta-information
that impact the decision-making process - Research from over 30 domain experts, and over
500h of interviews, observations and evaluations - From this developed a list of sources and types
of meta-information that was consistently
encountered across application domains - Believe this approach developed an understanding
of expert reasoning and behavior sufficient to
understand the impact of meta-information at a
level that supports modeling
8Types and Sources of Meta-Information
9Modeling Human Reasoning and Behavior
- Computational Representation of human reasoning
and behavior - Model based on recognition-primed decision-making
- Experts do not do significant amounts of
reasoning and problem solving, but rather have
been trained to recognize critical elements of a
situation and act accordingly - Domain independent, modeling situation
awareness-centered decision-making in
high-stress, time-critical environments - SAMPLE is a general use HBM
- Defined modules Information Processing,
Situation Assessment, Decision Making - Inputs processed by information processing module
- Processed data (detected events) passed to
situation assessment module - Assessed situation is passed to decision-making
module - Rules, or lookup table of actions after
situational assessment performed
10SAMPLE Model
11Bayesian Modeling about and with Meta-Information
- Difficult aspect of modeling human cognition and
behavioral processes is the need to reflect the
known impacts of meta-information on those
processes - Identified five features of reasoning that need
representation within human behavior models - Should succeed or fail to recognize relevant
meta-information based on attentional and
cognitive demands - Should support the representation of successful
or unsuccessful human strategies to process
information according to meta-information - Should represent the aggregation of
meta-information - Should capture how effectively meta-information
is understood relative to any prior understanding
or knowledge - Should succeed and fail at incorporating
meta-information-mediated situation assessments
into behavior or decisions
12Methods for Representing Human Reasoning
- Bayesian belief networks
- Fuzzy set theory
- Rule-based production systems
- Case-based reasoning
- BBNs address multiple types of modeling
requirements - Two types of meta-information reasoning
- Deductive reasoning
- Abductive reasoning
- BBNs support both types of reasoning
13Two Types of Reasoning
14Modeling the Recognition and Aggregation of
Meta-Information
- In many cases, human decision-makers will have to
compute meta-information from multiple factors - Data and meta-data can map to meta-information in
the following ways - One-to-one mappings
- Many-to-one mappings
- One-to-many mappings
- Many-to-many mappings
- Once meta-information is calculated, it can
influence the information gathering, situation
assessment, and decision-making process
15Applying BBNs to Model Congnitive Computation of
Meta Information
16Sensor Type as Node in Network Sensor Type 3
17Sensor Type as Node in Network Sensor Type 1
18Aggregating Meta-Information to Compute Overall
Confidence
19Modeling the Recognition and Aggregation of
Meta-Information
- Knowing the best means to aggregate
meta-information is challenging - Observation and study of human decision-making
amongst subject matter experts may provide some
justification, but will often unavoidably result
in inclusion of biases - Using engineering data about sources may not
adequately represent how a human would reason
about meta-information, resulting in less
reflective human behavior models
20Modeling the Impact of Meta-Information on
Situation Assessment
- Three Approaches
- Simply filter or prioritize information based on
meta-information - Include meta-information within BBN models of
information gathering, situation assessment, and
decision-making processes - Use the meta-information in a specific parameter
21Incorporating Meta-Information Explicitly into a
BBN No Confidence
22Incorporating Meta-Information Explicitly into a
BBN Low Confidence
23Examples of Computing the Probability of a
Discrete Value for a BBN Node
24Conclusion
- We described the application of meta-information
and BBNs in modeling each of the following types
of cognitive tasks - Recognition of relevant meta-information based on
aggregation of available data, meta-data,
information, and meta-information into types of
meta-information. - Filtering and prioritization of information based
on meta-information. - Aggregation of different types of
meta-information to acquire their combined
impact. - Understanding of the impact of meta-information
on existing knowledge - Incorporation of meta-information into mediation
of situation assessment and decision-making.
25Questions?