Title: Academic publishing advice from industry experts
1Advice from experts in academic publishing
- Useful extracts from our interviews with
industry experts in 2015
2What happened in 2015?
- The world of scholarly publishing witnessed many
trend-setting practices, significant discoveries,
and innovations.
3What do the experts have to say?
- We interviewed several publication experts and
discussed some of these trends with them. - They shared some really interesting views on
academic publishing.
4Sharing the knowledge
- Here, we present extracts of the knowledge they
shared to help you - Get first-hand publication-related advice to
motivate you in your publication journey - Know what experts think about important
publication-related topics - Broaden your perspective about academic research
and communication
5Tim Hunt
2001 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
Scan the QR code to view our interview series
with Tim Hunt.
6you only make discoveries when you are sort of
stumbling and bumbling about, turning over stones
at random. Making small mistakes in experiments
is fine, because you stand a chance of making
startling discoveries.
- On finding a research problem
7- Of course, Ive had my manuscripts rejected! Its
- very rare, almost unknown
- to get a letter from the editor saying, We love
your paper! Well publish it without any
changes.rejection is part - of the process.
On dealing with manuscript rejection
8Experienced researcher in hydrogen and hyperbaric
oxygen studies
Scan the QR code to view our interview with
Xuejun Sun.
9- I believe that a good research question should
have three characteristics novelty,
reasonableness, and verifiability. If your idea
has all three, waste no time and go for it.
On the characteristics of a good research question
10- To conduct scientific research, one must read a
large amount of literature. First, you must read
literature that is highly relevant to your
researchSecond, read literature that is somewhat
relevant to your research topicFinally, read up
on trending research topics
On the importance of literature reading in
scientific research
11- I would advice authors
- who are collaborating with others on a research
project/paper to be open. - Avoid keeping your expertise or ideas to
yourself. There is - no point to scientific collaboration if you are
not facilitating a two-way exchange of knowledge.
On the right attitude towards scientific
collaboration
On how researchers should approach scientific
collaboration
12Founder of Figshare
Scan the QR code to view our interview series
with Mark Hahnel.
13On why researchers should make their data
publicly available
- Academics think that data is useless or that they
only need - to publish novel findings. But there are actually
really lots - of reasons why you should just be making all of
the data available. You might get more citations.
One man's rubbish is another man's goldyou don't
know how people are going to use the data.
14Co-founder of SciELO
Scan the QR code to view our interview with Abel
Packer.
15- We cannot always talk about open access in the
strict sense of open access research articles.
There should be equal emphasis on setting up
sustainable and efficient open access publishing
models. The wide availability of publishing
related products, services, and solutionswill
boost the development of open access. Better
availability of published output will help build
a competitive market oriented to the production
of high quality journalsThis is the true spirit
of open science.
On open access and open science
16Chair, Department of Basic Medical Sciences and
Comprehensive Aids Research Center at Tsinghua
University, China
Scan the QR code to view our interview with
Linqi Zhang.
17- Research cannot be performed in a vacuum. It is
essential for researchers to stay updated about
the latest and most significant developments in
their field. And the best way to stay updated is
to read published literature.
On why researchers should stay updated about the
latest developments in their field
18when choosing a target journal, it is more
important for you, as a researcher, to ensure
that the journal publishes articles in the same
field, that your paper matches the aims and scope
of the journal, and that the journal is widely
read by researchers in your field. These factors
are more important than impact factor or other
superficial metrics.
On selecting a target journal
19Independent blogger/journalist
Scan the QR code to view our interview series
with Richard Poynder.
20- Publishers ought to be more transparent, not just
in their processes but in their finances - as wellthis is an issue not just for publishers,
but for researchers as wellIn short,
responsibility for many of the problems we see in
research and scholarly publishing today must be
laid at the feet of the entire research community.
On the need for transparency in publishing
21CEO and Founder of Overleaf
Scan the QR code to view our interview series
with John Hammersley.
22On the openness and reproducibility of research
- I see that science and research is becoming more
open with the mandates from governments that
publicly funded research should be open. I see it
becoming more reproducible and more transparent
with the inclusion of the data behind the paper
and making it easier and encouraging people to
reproduce work and test and validate different
conclusions.
23Director of the Institute of Mechanical and
Electrical Engineering, Nanchang Institute of
Experimental Center
Scan the QR code to view our interview with
Jianwu Yan.
24On why researchers should make their data
publicly available
- three aspects are most important in nurturing
scientific researchers of the new generation - Inculcate a great work ethic, and be patient.
- Think on your toes. Be quick and alert.
- Be receptive to new knowledge and information.
On how young researchers can build a successful
career
25Outreach and engagement manager, Altmetric
Scan the QR code to view our interview with
Stacy Konkiel.
26On the need for change in academic research and
publishing
- Im hopeful that in the near future, promotion
tenure committees will - start to become more nuanced in how they review
the contributions that - researchers have made to science. Once more
incentives for researchers to publish open access
are in place (especially those related to career - advancement and funding), I believe well see the
conservative nature of publishing fully change,
as well, based on an increased demand for open - access publishing services.
27Founder of Asias First Open Access Journal,
Science Postprint
Scan the QR code to view our interview with
Shinichiro Takezawa.
28On the global nature of research
-
- I believe that researchers in Asia,
too, need to grow and become involved - in various research developments on a
global scale. After all, scientific - research benefits all of humanity. And
research involves a lot of effort, - irrespective of the region where the
researchers are located. Everyone - deserves their due and needs a
platform to disseminate their findings.
29Need more advice?
- We hope you found these extracts useful!
- Check out our Interviews section for more
- Words of wisdom from publication experts!
- Visit
- http//www.editage.com/insights/industry-experts
30For useful resources and tips on
publication, visit our website
Connect with us
_at_EditageInsights