In June 2002, the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

In June 2002, the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry

Description:

For Assignment Solution Contact Casestudyhelp.in 9422028822 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Slides: 6
Provided by: infocasestudyhelp
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: In June 2002, the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry


1
Marketing Management info_at_casestudyhelp.in91
94220-28822
2
  • Marketing Management
  •  
  • Case Study (20 Marks)
  • In June 2002, the Information and
    Broadcasting (IB) Ministry of India ordered
    leading television (TV) broadcasters to ban the
    telecast of two surrogate ads of liquor brands,
    McDowell's No. 1 and Gilbey's Green Label. The
    Ministry also put some other brands Smirnoff
    Vodka, Hayward's 5000, Royal Challenge Whiskey
    and Kingfisher beer on a 'watch list.' The
    surrogates used by these advertisements ranged
    from audiocassettes, CDs and perfumes to golf
    accessories and mineral water. By August 2002,
    the IB Ministry had banned 12 advertisements.
    Leading satellite TV channels, including Zee,
    Sony, STAR and Aaj Tak were issued showcause
    notices asking them to explain their reason for
    carrying surrogate liquor advertisements.

3
  • The channels were asked to adhere strictly
    to the Cable Television Regulation Act 1995
    (Cable TV Act, 1995).2As a result, Zee and STAR
    stopped telecasting the advertisements Aaj Tak
    and Sony soon followed suit. In addition, the IB
    Ministry hired a private monitoring agency to
    keep a watch on all advertisements for violations
    of the Act. These developments led to heated
    debates over the issue of surrogate advertising
    by liquor companies. Though the liquor companies
    involved protested strongly against the IB
    Ministry's decision, they had no choice, but to
    comply with the regulations. Analysts remarked
    that the government's policy was hypocritical.
    One said, "On the one hand they allow these
    'socially bad' products to be manufactured and
    sold (in order to garner revenues) and then they
    deny the manufacturers the right to propagate
    knowledge of their products in order to drive
    sales.

4
  • Answer the following question.
  • Q1. Give an overview of the case.
  • Q2. Why the government was in dilemma for banning
    the liquor advertisements?

5
  • www.casestudyhelp.in
  • info.casestudyhelp_at_gmail.com
  • info_at_casestudyhelp.in
  • 91 94220-28822
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com