EDU 695 Week 3 DQ 1 Critical Thinking and Problem Solving NEW - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

EDU 695 Week 3 DQ 1 Critical Thinking and Problem Solving NEW

Description:

In Week Two, you created a presentation on why linking assessments with report cards that reflect CCSS is imperative. In this discussion, you expand on your knowledge about CCSS and debate the idea of whether creating high-quality assessments is necessary. Note that some educators argue that it is not enough to just create a link between assessments and report cards, but that assessments need to be high level and should require students to synthesize their learning instead of only demonstrating mastery by rote memory. Alternatively, some educators argue that high-quality assessments cost more than lower quality assessments (Eisner, 2001; Matthews, 2006; Pulfrey, Buch, & Butera, 2011). – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1
Slides: 4
Provided by: rudvakumar
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EDU 695 Week 3 DQ 1 Critical Thinking and Problem Solving NEW


1
ASH EDU 695 Week 3 DQ 1 Critical Thinking
and Problem Solving NEW Check this A tutorial
guideline at http//www.edu695assignment.com/edu-6
95- ash/edu-695-week-3-dq-1-critical-thinking-and-
problem-solving-new For more classes
visit http//www.edu695assignment.com
www.edu695assignment.com Critical Thinking and
Problem Solving In Week Two, you created a
presentation on why linking assessments with
report cards that reflect CCSS is imperative. In
this discussion, you expand on your knowledge
about CCSS and debate the idea of whether
creating high-quality assessments is necessary.
Note that some educators argue that it is not
enough to just create a link between assessments
and report cards, but that assessments need to be
high level and should require students to
synthesize their learning
2
instead of only demonstrating mastery by rote
memory. Alternatively, some educators argue that
high-quality assessments cost more than lower
quality assessments (Eisner, 2001 Matthews,
2006 Pulfrey, Buch, Butera, 2011). One
possible reason for this viewpoint is that
higher-level assessments often include
performance tasks and/or essays that require
teacher scoring, and thus a great deal of time is
spent on evaluating students' work. Conversely,
lower-level assessments measuring basic knowledge
through multiple-choice and true/false responses
they can be measured using technology and take
nsiderably less tt.e and reseiii-a to
measure. First, choose a side from the two
opposing
viewpoints described above and discuss one
of these two points
a. Can the American education system afford
assessments for deeper learning? b. Can the
American education system afford not to have such
high-quality assessments? Next, discuss if it is
necessary to share assessment items, rubrics and
21st-century practices with fellow colleagues.
3
Guided Response Respond to at least two peers.
Find one peer who has the same argument you chose
and one peer who chose the viewpoint you did not.
Debate how your viewpoint is different. If your
viewpoint is similar to that of your peers
discuss the similarities. Evaluate your peers'
responses to the use of multimedia resources with
regard to critical thinking and problem solving.
Though two replies is the basic expectation, for
deeper engagement and learning, you are
encouraged to provide responses to any comments
or questions others have given to you, including
the instructor. Responding to the replies given
to you will further the conversation and provide
additional opportunities for you to demonstrate
your content expertise, critical thinking, and
real-world experiences with this topic.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com