Accessibility Standards - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Accessibility Standards

Description:

Explore the latest in web accessibility with a guide to WCAG 2.2. Enhance your website's inclusivity and compliance! – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1
Slides: 17
Provided by: adasitecompliance
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Accessibility Standards


1
Accessibility Standards
2
WCAG 2.2 Decoding The Latest Web Accessibility
Guidelines
In the ever-evolving digital landscape,
accessibility has become a non-negotiable
imperative for all users. The updated and latest
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2,
released in October 2023, stands as a beacon of
inclusivity, providing comprehensive guidelines
for making web content accessible to people with
disabilities. Moreover, lawsuits against
businesses with non-compliant websites have
proliferated. According to ADA attorney Nolan
Klein, thousands of ADA lawsuits have been filed
in federal court alleging non-compliance with
WCAG standards. Implementation of WCAG 2.2
standards is therefore critical not only for
inclusivity but also for proper litigation risk
management. As we explore WCAG 2.2 and its
anticipated updates in 2023, this article aims to
simplify its complexities, shedding light on the
importance of web accessibility for the general
public. What is Web Accessibility? In todays
interconnected world, the Internet has become
indispensable for communication, education,
employment, and social engagement. Practically
everyone turns to the internet for a solution to
all their queries, be they booking tickets, job
opportunities, or making purchases. However, for
individuals with disabilities, the web can
present a daunting landscape of barriers,
hindering their ability to participate in the
digital sphere fully. This is where web
accessibility comes into play. It is the practice
of designing and developing websites and web
applications so that even people with
disabilities can easily and comfortably access
and use them. By removing accessibility barriers
and ensuring that web content is perceivable,
operable, understandable, and robust, web
accessibility promotes inclusivity and empowers
individuals with disabilities to navigate the
digital world quickly. The Significance of Web
Accessibility The importance of a strong web
accessibility initiative cannot be overstated. It
is a fundamental human right enshrined in the
United Nations Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Moreover, web
accessibility makes good business sense. By
catering to a broader audience, businesses can
expand their customer base, enhance their brand
reputation, and gain a competitive edge.
3
Impact on Diverse User Experiences Web
accessibility considerations extend far beyond
the realm of disabilities. They encompass a broad
spectrum of user experiences, including those
related to age, language barriers, and
situational impairments. Examples of situational
impairments include watching videos with only
audio in libraries or those with stubby fingers
preferring larger call-to-action buttons. By
designing websites that are inclusive and
accessible to all, we can create a more equitable
and user-friendly digital landscape. W3C
Releases Shaping the Evolution of
Accessibility The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
plays a pivotal role in developing and
maintaining WCAG, ensuring that the guidelines
remain relevant and effective in the face of
evolving technologies and user needs. The WCAG
2.2 was developed through the W3C process with
other individuals and worldwide organizations to
provide web content accessibility guidelines that
meet international governments, organizations,
and individuals accessibility needs. The W3C
recommends using the WCAG 2.2 as a standard for
the web.And thus provides the necessary resources
and training as guidance and clarity on
implementing WCAG. WCAG 2.2 A New Standard for
Web Accessibility In October 2023, the World Wide
Web Consortium (W3C) released WCAG 2.2, the
latest iteration of the Web Content Accessibility
Guidelines. The WCAG 2.2 is built on WCAG 2.0 and
2.1, the previous versions were built on WCAG
1.0, designed to apply different present and
future technologies and tested through manual and
automated testing. The update incorporates new
WCAG success criteria and techniques, addressing
the evolving needs of users with cognitive,
language, and learning disabilities and
reflecting advancements in web technologies. WCAG
2.2 and Its Relevance The release of WCAG 2.2
marks a significant step forward in pursuing web
accessibility. By adopting these guidelines, web
developers, content creators, and organizations
ensure their digital products and services are
accessible to a wider audience, fostering a more
inclusive and equitable online experience.
4
  • Multiple Layers of Guidance
  • The various individuals and organizations using
    WCAG include policymakers, web designers,
    teachers, and students. Thus, multiple layers of
    guidance meet this varied audiences
    comprehensive needs. These layers include
  • Overall Principles
  • The foundation of WCAG 2.2 rests upon four
    fundamental principles perceivable, operable,
    understandable, and robust. These principles,
    each encompassing specific guidelines and
    measurable success criteria, form the cornerstone
    of accessible web content.
  • Perceivable Content must be presented so that
    users with visual, auditory, or other sensory
    impairments can perceive it.
  • Operable Users with diverse abilities, including
    motor and speech impairments, must be able to
    operate a user interface component and navigate
    content effectively.
  • Understandable Content must be presented clearly
    and unambiguously so that users with cognitive,
    learning, or language disabilities can comprehend
    it easily.
  • Robust Content must remain accessible across all
    various assistive technology and user
    environments.
  • General Guidelines
  • These come next and are the 13 guidelines
    providing the goals authors adhere to for making
    content more accessible to users with different
    disabilities. While they arent testable, they
    provide the basic framework for authors to
    understand success criteria and, thus, better
    implement techniques.
  • Testable Success Criteria
  • Each guideline has testable success criteria to
    ensure WCAG 2.2 is used wherever requirements and
    performance testing are required. This includes
    design specifications, contractual agreements,
    and purchasing. WCAG 2.2 defines three levels of
    conformance level A, AA, and AAA, each
    representing a progressive level of accessibility
    in different groups and situations.
  • Level A The minimum level of accessibility,
    ensuring basic functionality for all users.
  • Level AA A higher level of conformance,
    addressing the needs of many disabled users. It
    is considered the recommended level for most
    websites.

5
  • Su?cient and Advisory Techniques
  • Various techniques are used for each guideline
    and success criterion in WCAG 2.2, divided into
    two categories. Sufficient techniques for meeting
    success criteria and advisory techniques that let
    authors go beyond the individual success criteria
    to address guidelines better. They may address
    accessibility problems or barriers the testable
    success criteria do not cover. These layers of
    guidance together guide web developers to make
    content more accessible by applying as many
    layers as possible. This includes including
    advisory techniques so that the content addresses
    the needs of most users.
  • WCAG 2.2 A Watershed Moment in Digital
    Accessibility
  • WCAG 2.2 addresses the ever-changing
    technological landscape and evolving user needs,
    thus emerging as a pivotal step forward from its
    predecessor, WCAG 2.1. This enhanced iteration
    introduces nine tool accessibility guidelines and
    new success criteria meticulously crafted to
    enhance accessibility for users with visual,
    physical, and cognitive disabilities. These
    additional success criteria encourage
  • Improved Focus Management
  • WCAG 2.2 introduces three enhanced focus
    management success criteria catering to users
    with motor impairments. These success criteria
    enable users to navigate web content smoothly and
    efficiently. These success criteria are
  • 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) (AA)
    According to this success criterion, there
  • might be some degree of hiding or obscuring
    keyboard-focused user interface components like
    buttons or links in a website or app design.
  • 2.4.12 Focus Not Obscured (Enhanced) (AAA)
    According to this success criterion, content web
    developers create, like website and app design,
    cannot hide any part of
  • keyword-focused user interface components.
  • 2.4.13 Focus Appearance (AAA) According to this
    success criterion, visible keyboard focus
    indicator parts must be a minimum of a 2 CSS
    pixel thick perimeter of unfocused components or
    sub-components. They should also have a minimal
    31 ratio between pixels in focused and unfocused
    states.

6
  • 2. Enhanced Touch Input Support
  • Recognizing the growing prevalence of
    touch-enabled devices, WCAG 2.2 introduces
    refined guidelines for touch input and page break
    navigation. This ensures seamless interaction for
    users with limited or no mouse interaction. These
    success criteria are
  • 2.5.7 Dragging Movements (AA)
  • According to this success criterion, a single
    pointer can perform dragging movements without
    dragging. Exceptions are when dragging is crucial
    to the functionality or the user agent dictates
    the functionality and remains unaltered by the
    author.
  • 2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum) (AA)
  • According to this success criterion, the minimum
    size for pointer input targets is 24 by 24 CSS
    pixels, with exceptions in
  • Spacing Targets smaller than 24 by 24 CSS pixels
    can be positioned so that, if a 24 CSS
  • pixel diameter circle is centered on each
    targets bounding box, the circles do not
    intersect with other targets.
  • Equivalent The same function can be accomplished
    through a different control on the same page,
    meeting the 24 by 24 CSS pixel criterion.
  • Inline The target is within a sentence, or its
    size is constrained by the line height of
    non-target text.
  • User-agent control The user agent determines the
    target size and remains unaltered by the author.
  • Essential A specific presentation of the target
    is deemed essential or is legally required for
    conveying the information.

7
  • 3. Clearer Color Contrast Guidance
  • WCAG 2.2 provides clearer and more stringent
    guidelines for color contrast to address the
    needs of low-vision users. It thus ensures text
    is easily distinguishable from its background.
    These success criteria are
  • 3.2.6 Consistent Help (A)
  • According to this success criterion, if web pages
    include certain help mechanisms like human
    contact details, human contact mechanisms,
    self-help options, and fully automated contact
    mechanisms, they should maintain a consistent
    order across multiple pages unless a
    user-initiated change occurs.
  • 3.3.7 Redundant Entry (A)
  • According to this success criterion,
    user-provided information that must be repeatedly
    entered in the same process is auto-populated or
    made available for the user to select. Exceptions
    are when
  • Re-entering the information is deemed essential
  • The information is necessary for ensuring content
    security
  • The previously entered information is no longer
    valid
  • 3.3.8 Accessible Authentication (Minimum) (AA)
  • According to this success criterion, an
    authentication process does not mandate cognitive
    function tests like remembering a password or
    solving a puzzle. Exceptions are when the step
    offers at least one of the following

8
  • 3.3.9 Accessible Authentication (Enhanced) (AAA)
  • According to this success criterion, cognitive
    function tests, like recalling a password or
    solving a puzzle, are not obligatory at any stage
    in an authentication process unless the step
    offers either
  • Alternative An alternative authentication method
    not dependent on a cognitive function test.
  • Mechanism A mechanism is accessible to aid the
    user in completing the cognitive function test.
  • The new success criteria may reference new terms
    that have also been added to the glossary and
    form part of the normative requirements of the
    success criteria. WCAG 2.2 also introduces new
    sections detailing aspects of specifications
    impacting privacy and security.
  • Was Any Success Criterion Removed from WCAG 2.2?
  • Yes, the success criterion 4.1.1 Parsing was
    removed from WCAG 2.2. It was removed as it was
    considered obsolete due to the advancements in
    web technology. Besides, new success criteria in
    WCAG 2.2 provide a more robust and up-to-date
    approach to ensuring accessible web content to
    disabled users. Here is why 4.1.1 Parsing was
    removed from WCAG 2.2
  • It was primarily focused on older technologies,
    such as HTML 4.0 and earlier versions of XHTML,
    which are no longer widely used.
  • It was not well-defined and could be interpreted
    differently, leading to inconsistencies in
    implementation.
  • It was not as effective as other success criteria
    in ensuring that web content is parsable by user
    agents.
  • Removing 4.1.1 Parsing from WCAG 2.2 does not
    mean the parsing issue is no longer important.
    However, the new success criteria in WCAG 2.2
    provide a more comprehensive and effective way to
    address this issue.

9
  • WCAG 2.1 vs. WCAG 2.2- The Differences
  • The latest Web Content Accessibility Guidelines,
    WCAG 2,2, builds upon its predecessor, WCAG 2.1,
    to further enhance web accessibility for people
    with disabilities. While WCAG 2.1 laid a solid
    foundation for accessible web development, WCAG
    2.2 introduces new success criteria, refines
    existing guidelines, and provides clearer
    instructions to make accessibility more
    achievable and maintainable. There are thus these
    five major differences between the two
  • New Success Criteria in WCAG 2.2
  • WCAG 2.2 introduces nine additional success
    criteria, addressing areas such as
  • Focus appearance Ensuring that focus indicators
    are sufficiently visible and distinguishable to
    aid navigation for users with low vision or
    cognitive disabilities.
  • Page break navigation Providing clear and
    consistent mechanisms for navigating between page
    breaks, particularly for users who rely on screen
    readers or keyboard navigation.
  • Dragging movements Making drag-and-drop
    interactions accessible to users with motor
    disabilities by providing adequate target sizes
    and clear visual feedback.
  • Consistent help Providing consistent and easily
    accessible help or support mechanisms throughout
    the website or application.
  • Visible controls Ensuring that all controls,
    including form fields and buttons, are clearly
    visible and distinguishable even to low-vision
    users.
  • These new success criteria reflect the evolving
    technological landscape and a deeper
    understanding of user needs, particularly those
    with cognitive disabilities.

10
  • Enhanced Mobile Accessibility
  • WCAG 2.2 continues to refine mobile accessibility
    guidelines, recognizing the growing prevalence of
    mobile devices and the need for websites and
    applications to be accessible across all
    platforms. This includes improvements in
  • Touch target sizes Ensuring touch targets are
    large enough and spaced appropriately to
    accommodate ease of use to users with motor
    disabilities or limited dexterity.
  • Input modalities Providing alternative input
    modalities, such as voice control or keyboard
    navigation, to cater to users with different
    physical abilities.
  • Context-aware activation Preventing
    unintentional activation of elements, such as
    pop-ups or overlays, that could hinder navigation
    for users with cognitive disabilities.
  • Improved Usability and Clarity
  • WCAG 2.2 aims to make the guidelines more
    user-friendly and actionable for developers and
    content creators through
  • More explicit guidelines Provide clearer and
    more explicit instructions for each success
    criterion to reduce the need for interpretation
    and ensure consistent implementation.
  • Additional examples Offer more comprehensive and
    illustrative examples to demonstrate how to meet
    each success criterion in real-world scenarios.
  • Improved organization Structuring the guidelines
    more logically and intuitively makes it easier
    for developers to find the information they need.
  • Backward Compatibility and Continuous Evolution
  • WCAG 2.2 maintains backward compatibility with
    WCAG 2.1, meaning that websites and applications
    conforming to WCAG 2.2 also adhere to WCAG 2.1
    accessibility standards. This ensures that
    accessibility efforts are not lost with each new
    guidelines version. As technology and user needs
    evolve, WCAG will adapt and refine its guidelines
    to ensure that the web remains an inclusive and
    accessible space for all.

11
5. Removal of One Success Criterion The success
criterion 4.1.1 Parsing was removed from WCAG 2.2
as it was considered obsolete compared to web
technology advancements. Besides, new additional
success criteria in WCAG 2.2 ensure web content
is accessible to users with disabilities. Impact
on User Experience As always, the WCAG 2.2 offers
an improved user experience, rendering digital
content more user-friendly and inclusive for
everyone, including users with disabilities. By
adhering to the latest WCAG 2.2 guidelines,
websites, and digital platforms become more
accessible to all their users and visitors,
regardless of their abilities. It doesnt matter
what disability the user may have or where they
are, they can easily navigate, comprehend, and
interact with the digital content. This is thus a
win-win situation for both users and web
developers. For example, visually impaired users
easily navigate websites with images with alt
text. In addition to improved accessibility, the
alt text helps with SEO, thus improving the
digital platforms SEO rankings. Similarly, users
with physical impairments and, in general, all
users can easily navigate websites that are
keyboard-navigable. WCAG and Its Benefits for
Businesses Embracing web accessibility
guidelines should never be considered a waste of
time or investment. Its because web
accessibility perfectly aligns with any and every
businesss interests. It offers benefits
like Broader Customer Base Not only does WCAG
2.2 ensure everyone has equal access to the web,
but the additional success criteria in WCAG 2.2
address additional disabilities to foster a
broader customer base. People with disabilities
form a major part of any website visitors. They
will not be able to use or visit inaccessible
websites. This, in turn, prevents them from
accessing important information or performing
important tasks like applying for jobs, booking
tickets, or making purchases.
12
  • Increased Compliance
  • Adhering to WCAG 2.2 guidelines helps businesses
    and organizations comply with legal standards
    like accessibility laws and regulations
    protecting the rights of users with disabilities.
    Examples include the Americans with Disabilities
    Act (ADA), Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act,
    and the European Web Directive. With businesses
    adhering to the latest WCAG 2.2, there are
    reduced chances of users filing cases for
    inaccessibility. Businesses thus save money by
    avoiding lawsuits. Besides, by ensuring equal
    access to users with disabilities, organizations
    and businesses contribute to creating a more
    inclusive and equitable digital environment for
    all.
  • Common Challenges in WCAG 2.2 Implementation and U
    seful Solutions
  • Implementing WCAG 2.2 can be complex and
    challenging for businesses and organizations, as
    incorporating them into web development and
    maintenance processes can pose significant
    hurdles.
  • 5 Common Challenges Businesses Face
  • The five common challenges faced by most
    businesses and web developers while implementing
    WCAG 2.2 include
  • Lack of Awareness and Understanding Many
    businesses and organizations lack a
  • comprehensive understanding of WCAG 2.2 and its
    implications for their websites and applications.
    This lack of knowledge can lead to unintentional
    non-compliance and potential legal issues.
  • Resource Constraints Implementing WCAG 2.2 often
    requires significant financial and human
    resources. Businesses may need to allocate
    additional funds for accessibility testing,
    training, and software tools while dedicating
    staff time to address accessibility issues.
  • Legacy Technology and Codebases Websites and
    applications built on older technologies or with
    complex codebases may be more challenging to
    adapt to WCAG 2.2 standards. This can require
    extensive, time-consuming, and costly refactoring
    and code remediation.
  • Content Management Systems (CMS) and Third-party
    Tools Integrating WCAG 2.2
  • compliance into CMS and third-party tools can be
    tricky, especially in tools lacking built-in
    accessibility features.
  • Ongoing Maintenance and Testing WCAG 2.2
    compliance is not a one-time project. It
  • requires ongoing maintenance and testing to
    ensure new content and updates adhere to the
    guidelines. This can add to the ongoing costs and
    resource demands for maintaining an
  • accessible website.

13
  • Practical Solutions to Overcome Challenges
  • The good news is that there are practical
    solutions that web developers can easily use to
    overcome these challenges. They include
  • Educating and Training Staff Regular training
    sessions for web developers, designers, and
    content creators raise awareness of WCAG 2.2
    guidelines and best practices.
  • This helps ensure that accessibility
    considerations are integrated into all web
    development and maintenance aspects.
  • Prioritize Accessibility from the Start
    Incorporating accessibility considerations into
    web development projects planning and design
    phases helps.
  • This proactive approach can help identify and
    address potential accessibility issues early on,
    thus preventing costly retrofits later.
  • Utilize Accessibility Testing Tools Employing
    automated accessibility testing tools to identify
    and troubleshoot accessibility issues throughout
    the development process also helps.
  • These tools can provide valuable insights and
    help streamline the remediation process.
  • Choose Accessible CMS and Third-party Tools When
    selecting CMS and third-party tools, prioritize
    those that offer built-in accessibility features
    and support WCAG 2.2 compliance.
  • This can save time and effort in the long run.
    Businesses may need to customize these tools or
    find alternative solutions that meet
    accessibility requirements.
  • Establish an Accessibility Workflow Implementing
    a clear accessibility workflow that outlines
    roles, responsibilities, and procedures for
    ensuring and maintaining WCAG 2.2 compliance
    helps.
  • This will help keep accessibility at the
    forefront of web development and maintenance.

14
  • Clearing Common WCAG 2.2 Implementation
    Misconceptions
  • A few common misconceptions about implementing
    WCAG 2.2 discourage web developers from
    implementing them. Here are 5 common
    misconceptions dispelled
  • Accessibility is Expensive True
  • Yes, implementing WCAG 2.2 can involve upfront
    costs. However, the long-term benefits of an
    accessible website outweigh these expenses. An
    accessible website can increase user engagement,
    improve brand reputation, and reduce the risk of
    legal issues.
  • Accessibility is Only for People with
    Disabilities False
  • Accessibility benefits everyone, not just those
    with disabilities. An accessible website is more
    user-friendly and usable for all, regardless of
    their abilities or limitations.
  • Accessibility is Too Technical True
  • While some technical expertise is required to
    implement WCAG 2.2, accessibility is not solely a
    technical issue. It requires collaboration
    between designers, developers, content creators,
    and stakeholders to ensure a truly accessible
    user experience.
  • Accessibility Can Wait False
  • Accessibility should not be an afterthought for
    website owners. It is essential to integrate
    accessibility considerations into all web
    development and maintenance phases. Addressing
    accessibility early on can save time and
    resources in the long run.
  • Accessibility is Binary False
  • Accessibility is not a pass-fail situation but a
    spectrum of conformance levels. Businesses should
    strive to achieve the highest level of
    accessibility possible, as even incremental
    improvements can make a significant difference
    for users with disabilities.

15
Conclusion WCAG 2.2 marks a significant milestone
in pursuing digital accessibility by addressing
more accessibility needs. It builds on WCAG 2.1
by adding new guidelines and success criteria and
clarifying and updating existing ones. It makes
the web more accessible and offers a roadmap for
creating inclusive and user-friendly websites for
individuals with diverse abilities. By adhering
to these guidelines, web developers, content
creators, and organizations play a pivotal role
in bridging the digital divide, thus ensuring
everyone has equal access to digital content
across the internet. Web Content Accessibility
Guidelines Experts ADA Site Compliance Contact
ADA Site Compliance today for all your ADA
website compliance and website accessibility
needs! Get your FREE SITE SCAN now. We are
leaders in assistive technologies and making all
your websites accessible.
https//adasitecompliance.com/wcag-2-2-decoding-la
test-web-accessibility-guidelines/
16
ADA Site Compliance
Website Digital Accessibility Solutions
https//adasitecompliance.com/
8401 Lake Worth Rd Lake Worth, FL
33467 info_at_adasitecompliance.com (561)
258-9300 https//www.facebook.com/ADAsitecomplian
ce/ https//twitter.com/siteCompliance https//www
.instagram.com/adasitecompliance/
https//www.linkedin.com/company/adasitecompliance
/ https//www.youtube.com/channel/UCCf20J8_Uf2S4KG
nq2uAo2A
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com