⚡PDF ❤ Rise of the Unmeltable Ethnics

1
(No Transcript)
2
Rise of the Unmeltable Ethnics
3
Rise of the Unmeltable Ethnics
Sinopsis
Purchase of this book includes free trial access
to www.million-books.com where you can read more
than a million books for free.brThis is an OCR
edition with typos.brExcerpt from
book58brCHAPTER III. Ontology And Epistemology.
The conclusions of the two preceding chapters
have led us to a further problem which we shall
here be forced to face. If it be true that
thought does in point of fact express the nature
of things, then it would seem to follow that the
science of thought is the science of things, that
ontology and epistemology coincide. In this
connection two questions arise58 Does Hegel
identify the two? And if so, what does he mean
by the identification and what justification is
there for it? It is to the task of answering
these questions that we now address ourselves. To
the first of the above questions there can, I
think, be only one answer. Hegel does identify
logic and metaphysics. In the first place, we
have his own explicit statement on the point.
Since thoughts are Objective Thoughts, he says,
Logic therefore coincides with metaphysics, the
science of things set and held in
thoughts151thoughts accredited able to express
the essential reality
of things.1 bias of the categories
Besides such an explicit statement, one might
offer as evidence the whole logical Hegelian
philosophy which is unquestionably towards this
identification. Since the really are, as forms
of the Notion, the vital spirit of the actual
world, and since
things or objects which do not agree with them
are accidental, arbitrary, and untrue phenomena 3
since the universal aspect of the object is not
something subjective attributed
4
to it only when it is an object of thought, but
ratherbelongs to and expresses its
essential nature, it follows that the science
which has to do with these universals is ipso
facto the science of reality. This science, of
course, is logic. Logic, therefore, is
metaphysics.4 lEnc., sect 24. 'Ibid., sect 162.
'Cf. Werke, Bd. V, p. 231. Notice also H...
5
Bestselling new book releases
Rise of the Unmeltable Ethnics
6
(No Transcript)
7
COPY LINK TO DOWNLOAD AND GET ABOOK copy link in
description
8
Rise
of
the
Unmeltable
Ethnics
copy link in description
Purchase of this book includes free trial access
to www.million-books.com where you can
read more than a million books for free.brThis is
an OCR edition with typos.brExcerpt from
9
book58brCHAPTER III. Ontology And Epistemology.
The conclusions of the two preceding chapters
have led us to a further problem which we shall
here be forced to face. If it be true that
thought does in point of fact express the nature
of things, then it would seem to follow that the
science of thought is the science of things, that
ontology and epistemology coincide. In this
connection two questions arise58 Does Hegel
identify the two? And if so, what does he mean
by the identification and what justification is
there for it? It is to the task of answering
these questions that we now address ourselves. To
the first of the above questions there can, I
think, be only one answer. Hegel does identify
logic and metaphysics. In the first place, we
have his own explicit statement on the point.
Since thoughts are Objective Thoughts, he says,
Logic therefore coincides with metaphysics, the
science of things set and held in
thoughts151thoughts accredited able to express
the essential reality
of things.1 bias of the categories
Besides such an explicit statement, one might
offer as evidence the whole logical Hegelian
philosophy which is unquestionably towards this
identification. Since the really are, as forms
of the Notion, the vital spirit of the actual
world, and since
things or objects which do not agree with them
are accidental, arbitrary, and untrue phenomena 3
since the universal aspect of the object is not
something subjective attributed to it only when
it is an object of thought, but ratherbelongs to
and expresses its essential nature, it follows
that the science which has to do with these
universals is ipso facto the science of reality.
This science, of course, is logic. Logic,
therefore, is metaphysics.4 lEnc., sect 24.
'Ibid., sect 162. 'Cf. Werke, Bd. V, p. 231.
Notice also H...