Download Between Crime and War: Hybrid Legal Frameworks for Asymmetric Conflict (ETHICS NATIONAL SECURITY RULE LAW SERIES) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Download Between Crime and War: Hybrid Legal Frameworks for Asymmetric Conflict (ETHICS NATIONAL SECURITY RULE LAW SERIES)

Description:

Copy Link | gooread.fileunlimited.club/srjun24/0197638791 | Between Crime and War: Hybrid Legal Frameworks for Asymmetric Conflict (ETHICS NATIONAL SECURITY RULE LAW SERIES) | The threat posed by the recent rise of transnational non-state armed groups does not fit easily within either of the two basic paradigms for state responses to violence. The civilian paradigm focuses on the interception of demonstrable immediate threats to the safety of others. The military paradigm focuses on threats posed by collective actors who pose a danger to the state's ability to maintain basic social order and, at times, the very existence of the state. While the United States has responded to the threat posed by non-state armed groups by using tools from both paradigms, it has placed substantially more emphasis on the military paradigm than have other states. While several reasons may contribute to this a – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:0
Date added: 21 June 2024
Slides: 6
Provided by: blakeseyibradshaw
Category: Entertainment
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Download Between Crime and War: Hybrid Legal Frameworks for Asymmetric Conflict (ETHICS NATIONAL SECURITY RULE LAW SERIES)


1
BS eE t
R w
I Ee eS n
C
r -
i b
m o
e
o ka n
d
W w
a e
r e
n
H C
y r
b
imr id
L a
e n
g d
a W
l
F a
r r
a
m H
e y
w b
o r i
r d
k sL ef o
r
A F
s r
y a
m m
me we tor ir
c
k sC of o
n r
f l A
ic s
t y
( m
E T m
H e
I t
C r i
S c
NC Ao n
T f
I l
O ic
N t
A
( EL T
S H
E I
C C
U S
R N
I T A
Y T I
R O
U N
L A
E
L L
A
W C U
S R
E I
R T
I Y
E S R
) U
d L
o E
w L
n A
l W
o a dS E
P R
D I
F
E S, r
) e
da do
B
e l
t o
w a
e d
e , P
n D
C F
r
i E
m P
e
U Ba n
B d
e Wt w
a e
r e
n
H C
y r
b
r
i
d
L a
e n
g d
a l W
F a
r ar
m H
e y
w b
o r
r
idk sL fe
o g
r a
A l
s F
y r a
m m
m e
e
wt roi
c
C
o f o
n
rf li
c
t
(
E T m
H
eI Ct
S
N C
A o
T n
I f
O
licNt A
L
S H
E I
C C
U S
R N
I T A
Y T I
R O
U N
L
AE LL SA EWC US ER
R
I TI EY S
)
, L
p E
d L
f
B
e t wS E
e R
e nI E
C S
r )
i
m
e n l
a in
n e
d
W
a
t wr
e H
e ny b
r
idim
L e
e g a
a n
l d
F W
r a a
mr e w
o
r b
k r
s
f
o
r
A a
s l
y mF r ma me te
r w
ic o
C r k
o s
n f l o
icr t
(
E y
T m
H m
I C e
S t r
N ic
A C
T o
I On fNli
A c t
L
S
E T
C H
U I C
R S
I T N
Y
R
UI LO
E
N LAAL WS E
S C
E U
R
RI EI T
S Y
)
, d
o L
w E
n L
lo A
a W
d S
r e E
a R
d I E
B S
e )
t wr e
e a
e d
n d
C o
r w
im n
e lo
a a
n d
d , f u
W
llaBr e t
H w
y e
b e
r n
id C
L r
e
img a
e l
F
r a d
m W
e a
w r
o
r H
k sy bf or i
r d
A L
s e
y g
m a l
m F
er tar
ic
C w
o o
n r
f k
li s
c tf o
( r
E T A
H
s yI C
S
N e
A t r
T
icI O
N
A n
L f li
S
c tE C( E
U T
R H
I I
T C
Y S
R N
U A
L T
E
I LOA
WA L
S S
E E
R C
I E U
S R
) I T
P Y
D F R
, U
f u L
l E
l
d L
o A
w W
n l S
o E
a
Rd I
B E
e
t )
w r
e e
e a
n d
C d
r o
imw n
e lo
a a
n d
d , B
W e
a
t wr
He ny bCr ir
d im
L e
e g a
a n
l d
F rWa ma
e
w H
o y
r b
k r
s
idf o
L r
e gA as yl
m F r
m
a me t
r
ic o
C r k
o s
n f f
l o
ic r
t A
( s
E y
T m
H m
I C e
S t r
N ic
A
CT oI On Nf liAc Lt
S
E T
C H
UI RC IST YN
R
U I
L O
E N
L A
A L
W S E
S C
E U
R R
I EI T
S Y
)
R ,
f u
l E
l
e L
b A
o W
o k S
B E
e R
t I
w E
e S
e )
n
k Cin
r d
imle
e , B
a e
n t w
d
e W
e na r
C
r H
imy b
r ia
d
n Ld
e W
g a a
l
r F r
a
m b
er wid
o
Lr ek gs aflo Fr
A
s
my me
m
e
r kt r
icf o
C r
o A
n s
f l y
ic m
t
( E
T t
H
r iIc
C C
S o
N
A li
T c
It O( NE T
A H
L
S
E S
C N
U A
R
TI TI OY N
R A
U L
L ES E
L C
A U
W R I
S T
E Y
R R
I E U
S L
) E
, L
e A
p W
u b
B
e R
t wI E
e S
e )
n f o
C r
r i a
m u
e d i
a o
n b
d o o
W k ,
a
Br e
H
y e
b e
r n
id C
L r
e
img a
e l
F
r a d
m W
e a
w r
o
r
Hk sy bf or i
r d
A L
s e
y g
m a l
m F
e
r at r
ic
C w
o o
n r
f k
li s
c tf o
( r
E TA
H
s yI Cm
S m
N e
A t r
T
icI O
N
A n
L f li
S
c tE (C
U
R H
I I
T C
Y S
R N
U A
L T
E
I LOA
W
S S
E E
R C
I E U
S R
)
I T, d
o
w U
n L
lo E
a L
d A
f W
r e eS E
B R
e I
t E
w S
e )
e nf o rC ripima d
e
, Ba ne dt
W
a
nr
H
y
mb
L d
e g W
a l a
F
r r a
m
e b
w
r ido r
k
s g
f a
o l
r
Ar sa
y m
m e
m w o
e
rt rki
s c
C
o r
n
Af lsicy t
(
E T e
H t r
I i
C c
S C o
N n
A f
T
li IcO
N ( E
A T
L H
S I C
E S
C U N
R A
I T
T I
Y O
R N
U A
L L
E S
L E
A C
WU R
S I
E T
RY IRE US )L E, r Le
a d
f r S
e E
e R
B I E
e S
t w )
e f o
e r
n
C
r d
imr o
e id
a ,
n B
d e t
W w
a e
r e
n
H C
y r
b
imr id
L a
e n
g d
a l W
F
ar ar
m
e y
w b
or ridk sL ef o
g r
A
y
m m
m e
e w
t o
r i r
c
k sC of o
n r
f liA
c
st y
( m
E T m
H e
I t
C r
S ic
N C
A o
T
I
N t
A( LE T
S H
E I
C C
U S
R N
I T A
Y T I
R O
U N
L A
E L
L S
A E
W C U
S
RE RI T
I Y
E S R
) U
, L
G E
e tL A
a W
c c e S
s E
B R
e
I Et wS )e e
n
C a
r r
imb a
e c k
a ,
n dB
W
a e
r e nH y
br rimid
e L ea gn ad l
F r
a r
m
He wy b
o r
r i
k d
s
f
o g
r
A
s F
y r
m a m
m e
e w
t r o
icr k
C s
o f
n o
f
rlic
A t
s (y
E m
T m
H I e
C
t rSic
N C
A o
T n
I f
O li
N c t
A (
L E
ST EH
C I C
U S
R I N
T A
Y T
R
S E C U R I T Y I OU NL EA LL A W
)
, E
B e t
e
g a l
S E
w n
i
e
r k
A s
y m
r ic
( E T
R U
A W
,
o
B e
C r
H y
i
d
L e g
A s
( E
A T
R U
a n
m e
m m
C o
N
e
r
e w
( E
A T
U L
e
H y
r a
w o
s
m e
I C
S E
t w
a n
m e
C o
E T
N A L
Y
R
w e e
C r i
e
H y
L e
F
f o
m m
t
A W
a n
e

H
a
F
a
f
l
i
c
p
a p
e t w
C
W a
L e
a l
R U L E L A W S E R I E S ) f u ll f r e e a c c
e s , d o w n lo a d f r e e e b o o k B e t w e
e n C r im e a n d W a r H y b r id L e g a l F
r a m e w o r k s f o r A s y m m e t r ic C o n
f lic t ( E T H I C S N A T I O N A L S E C U R I
T Y R U L E L A W S E R I E S ) , d o w n lo a d
B e t w e e n C r im e a n d W a r H y b r id L
e g a l F r a m e w o r k s f o r A s y m m e t r
ic C o n f lic t ( E T H I C S N A T I O N A L S
E C U R I T Y R U L E L A W S E R I E S ) p d f ,
P D F B e t w e e n C r im e a n d W a r H
y b r id L e g a l F r a m e w o r k s f o r A s
y m m e t r ic C o n f lic t ( E T H I C S N A T
I O N A L S E C U R I T Y R U L E L A W S E R I E
S ) , D O C B e t w e e n C r im e a n d W a r
H y b r id L e g a l F r a m e w o r k s f o r A
s y m m e t r ic C o n f lic t ( E T H I C S N A
T I O N A L S E C U R I T Y R U L E L A W S E R I
E S )
2
BESTSELLER
3
Between Crime and War Hybrid Legal Frameworks
for Asymmetric Conflict (ETHICS NATIONAL SECURITY
RULE LAW SERIES)
Simple Step to Read and Download
1. Create a FREE Account
2. Choose from our vast selection of EBOOK and PDF
3. Please, see if you are eligible to Read or
Download book Between Crime and War Hybrid
Legal Frameworks for Asymmetric Conflict (ETHICS
NATIONAL SECURITY RULE LAW SERIES)
4. Read Online by creating an account Between
Crime and War Hybrid Legal Frameworks
for Asymmetric Conflict (ETHICS NATIONAL SECURITY
RULE LAW SERIES) READ MAGAZINE
4
Description
The threat posed by the recent rise of
transnational non-state armed groups does not fit
easily within either of the two basic paradigms
for state responses to violence. The civilian
paradigm focuses on the interception of
demonstrable immediate threats to the safety of
others. The military paradigm focuses on threats
posed by collective actors who pose a danger to
the state's ability to maintain basic social
order and, at times, the very existence of the
state. While the United States has responded to
the threat posed by non-state armed groups by
using tools from both paradigms, it has placed
substantially more emphasis on the military
paradigm than have other states. While several
reasons may contribute to this approach, one may
be the assumption that a state must use each set
of tools strictly according in accordance with
the principles that underlie each paradigm.
Implicit in this assumption may be the sense that
the only alternative to the civilian paradigm is
the unqualified military one. The chapters in
this book suggest, however that we need not see
the options as confined to this binary choice. It
may be profitable to consider borrowing elements
from each paradigm on some occasions to act more
expansively than the conventional civilian
paradigm allows, but less expansively than the
conventional military paradigm would permit. At
the same time, the mixing of the categories comes
with its own ethical and legal risks that should
be scrutinized.
5
Between Crime and War Hybrid Legal Frameworks
for Asymmetric Conflict (ETHICS NATIONAL SECURITY
RULE LAW SERIES)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com