LEADERSHIP AND ETHICS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: SEMINAR SERIES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

LEADERSHIP AND ETHICS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: SEMINAR SERIES

Description:

leadership and ethics in the public sector: seminar series consolidating good governance in ghana: lessons from the last decade by commissioner emile short – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:259
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Franci547
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LEADERSHIP AND ETHICS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: SEMINAR SERIES


1
LEADERSHIP AND ETHICS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR
SEMINAR SERIES
  • CONSOLIDATING GOOD GOVERNANCE IN GHANA LESSONS
    FROM THE LAST DECADE

by Commissioner Emile Short 20th June 2005
2
Session Objective
  • Examines the evolution of the democratic process
    in Ghana
  • Considers whether country is making progress on
    the path of democratic consolidation
  • Special attention has been paid to the role of
    the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative
    Justice (CHRAJ) in the democratic process.

3
Democratic Consolidation in Ghana
  • originally, the term democratic consolidation
    was meant to describe the challenge of making new
    democracies secure, of extending their life
    expectancy beyond the short term,

Andreas Schedler
of making them immune against the threat of
authoritarian regression, of building dams
against eventual reverse waves.
4
THE TRANSITION
  • Authoritarian military rule from December 1981

1992 CONSTITUTION
  • The People vote for Constitutional Democracy
  • Constitution Comes into force on 7th January 1993

5
THE TRANSITION (continued)
  • Provides for
  • Multi-party parliamentary democracy.
  • A number of Independent State Institutions
  • A Bill of Rights and Freedoms consisting of
    thirty three articles
  • Independent print and electronic media.

6
CHRAJ
Office of the Ombudsman National human rights
commission Anti-corruption agency Enforce Code
of conduct for public officers Restore property
confiscated by military regimes
7
1993-1996
  • First presidential election rejected by the
    opposition
  • Opposition boycotts parliamentary elections
  • Acrimony over celebration of 1979 uprising and
    1981 military coup
  • CHRAJ de-confiscates properties and reverses
    executive decisions

8
1993-1996 (continued)
  • CHRAJ investigates ministers of state for
    corruption
  • enhanced public confidence
  • worsened relationship with government.
  • affected ministers resigned positions.
  • CHRAJ undertakes human rights activities
  • nationwide workshops for police and prison
    officers about the rights of suspects, accused
    persons, and convicts.
  • annual inspection of prisons and police cells to
    ensure minimum standards.

9
1993-1996 (continued)
  • No significant gains in democratic consolidation
  • One-party Parliament
  • Rule of law deficits
  • Little or no respect for human rights
  • Little or no support for governance institutions
  • Media freedom deficits

10
1996-2000
  • 1996 elections keenly contested.
  • The elections were considered free and fair
  • The opposition openly accepted defeat.
  • The relative success due to active participation
    of civil society and the media.

11
1996-2000 (continued)
  • The electoral process suffered from flaws
  • Credibility of the voters register.
  • High incidence of rejected ballot papers
  • Pattern of block voting along ethnic lines.

12
1996-2000 (continued)
  • Conclusion An imperfect democracy.
  • Illegal arrests and detention by the military
  • Pronouncements that democracy was impediment to
    development
  • The Judiciary perceived as not being
    independent.
  • The private owned media victims of government
    crackdowns,
  • Journalists were prosecuted and imprisoned under
    criminal libel law

13
2000-2004
2000 elections
a milestone
  • Elections widely accepted as free and fair
  • Historic transition of government through ballot
    box.
  • Vibrant and effective opposition in Parliament
  • The new Government created
  • sense of greater freedom,
  • environment for enjoyment of human rights and
    freedoms.
  • new and healthy relationship between the police
    and the military.

14
2000-2004, A Milestone (continued)
  • Democratic institutions like CHRAJ did not feel
    under siege
  • The rule of law was more rigidly observed
  • The Judiciary began to assert its independence.
  • Prosecution of former ministers of state for
    willfully causing financial loss to the state.
  • CHRAJ investigated a complaint alleging conflict
    of interest against the President without
    interference or intimidation.

Democratic Consolidation
15
2004 elections
  • Another key milestone in Ghanas democratic
    process.
  • Outcome of the polls broadly accepted by public
  • President Kuffour received 52 of vote
  • Minority Presidential candidate, Atta-Mills got
    44.
  • The minority secured 94 of the 230 parliamentary
    seats
  • Some sitting MPs from both sides of the House
    were voted out of office.
  • The voter turnout high.

16
Assess Democratic Consolidation
in favour
  • Positive Factors
  • Commitment to democracy
  • Electoral system gains legitimacy.
  • Power alternation from one elected civilian
    government to another
  • Strong allegiance to political parties
  • Increased Civil oversight of the military

17
Assess Democratic Consolidation
threats
  • Negative Factors
  • Ethnic regional voting.
  • Deteriorating relationship between the former and
    the present President.
  • Corruption on the increase.
  • Poverty and unemployment
  • Need for greater civic education about the
    dynamics of democracy

18
Conclusion
  • Ghana a functional democracy
  • Vibrant print and electronic media
  • Dynamic civil society organisations
  • Parliamentary democracy
  • vibrant opposition in Parliament,
  • multi-party democracy.

19
Conclusion (continued)
  • The people have sustained enthusiasm to political
    pluralism, democracy, and the rule of law.
  • Ghanas democracy a showcase for the West
    African sub-region.
  • Professor Clapham, University of Cambridge,
  • democracy always a work-in-progress
  • The people are safest guarantee of our democracy.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com