Gs lift and ESP Optimization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Gs lift and ESP Optimization

Description:

Some basic recommendations for troubleshooting gas lift and ESP systems – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:0
Date added: 29 October 2024
Slides: 34
Provided by: HariGarcia
Category: Other
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gs lift and ESP Optimization


1
Gas Lift Optimization
2
Gas Lift Optimization
  • Optimum production by gas lift is a stable rate
    as a consequence of a specific gas injection rate
    which leads to a production sustained for a
    longer time.
  • Generally, the optimal amount of gas injection is
    determined by well tests, the rate of injection
    is varied, and corresponding liquid production is
    measured.
  • Another way to optimize the gas lift injection
    rate to attain optimum profitability is using the
    Gas Lift Performance Curve, attained from
    Prosper, the method is defined as
  • Selecting 4 points on the curve performance
  • Draw tangents to each point
  • Generate the slopes
  • The slopes are plotted vs gas injection rate

3
Gas Lift Optimization
The slope of the plot, is defined as M M
Cg/FoP Cg Gas lift cost, /MMscf Fo Oil
cut P Profit/barrel, /bbl
Plot of Gas Lift Performance Curve
Plot of Slope against Gas Injected, MMscf/day
4
Gas Lift Optimization
Always is it good to validate the optimum gas
injection volume with well tests
5
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
Field Techniques for Troubleshooting a Gas Lift
Well The main issue in gas lift injection is the
point of injection The technique more suitable
for a particular well must be carefully defined
to avoid unnecessary expenses and/or risk Most
common tests Communication Tests Define holes,
damaged check valves, unseated valves, leaking
completion packers, or annulus-tubing
communication
6
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
  • Troubleshooting steps
  • There are three main areas where gas lift
    problems may occur
  • Inlet (Surface)
  • Outlet (Surface)
  • Downhole
  • First, analyze surface
  • Gauges should be calibrated

7
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
  • Inlet problems
  • Excessive Gas Usage
  • Casing pressure
  • Over injection
  • Tubing or collar leak
  • Cut or washed out lift valve
  • Choke sizing
  • Faulty gauges (WH casing or tubing pressures)

8
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
  • Inlet problems
  • High casing pressure
  • Gas injection volume
  • Partially plug valves
  • Flowing temperature
  • Higher tubing pressure
  • Restriction in the tubing

9
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
  • Inlet problems
  • Low gas usage
  • Confirm gas volume injection meter
  • Verify operating temperature of gas lift valve
  • Test injection/flow choke

10
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
  • 2. Outlet problems High back pressure is an
    indicator of a problem with the outlet
  • Restriction through choke, debris or choke body
  • Paraffin or scale build-up in the flowline
  • Flowlines 90 degree turns or elbows
  • Separator operating pressure
  • Valve restrictions should be fully open and
    properly designed. Smashed flowline (road
    crossing places)

11
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
  • 2. Downhole problems more difficult to identify,
    only approach is to interpret the information and
    find out
  • Well blowing gas dry
  • Casing pressure exceeding the design operating
    pressure
  • Tubing communication
  • Lift point (verify with echometer or survey)
  • Verify inflow from formation (if possible)
  • If upper valves are operation properly, then the
    issue is below

12
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
  • 2. Downhole problems more difficult to identify,
    only approach is to interpret the information and
    find out
  • Well will not take input gas
  • Frozen choke or closed input gas valve
  • Closed wing valves on the outlet side
  • Feed problems
  • If temperature is a problem, the well will
    produce periodically
  • Verify the valve set pressures are not too high
    for the available casing pressure

13
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
  • 2. Downhole problems
  • Well flowing in heads
  • Too much or too little injection
  • Port size of valves too large (pressure valves),
    limited feed from the reservoir
  • Temperature interference (higher than expected
    volume at the beginning). With cooled valves,
    they will open again

14
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
2. Downhole problems
  • Well will not unload
  • fluid column heavier than available lift
    pressure, or designed fluid weight lighter than
    actual weight
  • WH backpressure is too high
  • Valve staying open (sediments in the valves,
    salt)

15
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
2. Downhole problems
  • Hole in tubing. Test equalize tubing pressure
    and casing pressure by closing the sing valve.
  • Low casing pressure and tubing pressure when
    closing the wing valve with the gas injection on

16
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
  • 2. Downhole problems
  • Valve spacing too wide
  • If a high pressure well is nearby, use it to
    unload the well or use N2.
  • If the problem is severe, re-space the valves. A
    pack off gas lift is required, or shoot the
    tubing to get a new point of injection

17
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
  • 3. Tuning the well
  • Unloading the well requires more gas volume
    injection than when operating
  • Often, the input gas volume can be reduced once
    the point of injection has been reached
  • Start the well on small input choke like 8/64,
    then increase the choke by 1/64 increments until
    the maximum fluid rate is achieved. Allow the
    well to stabilize for 24 hours after each change
    before another adjustment.

18
Gas Lift Troubleshooting
19
Gas Lift Design examples
  • Determine the optimum GLR given conditions
  • Unlimited amount of gas available,
  • Given amount of gas (limited)

20
Gas Lift Design examples
21
ESP Design
22
ESP non-Standard Conditions
ESP system for Conventional applications (Single
fluid, no gas production) Non-optimum conditions
for the pump may affect adversely the efficiency
of this type of artificial lift system. The
solution to those new conditions Introduction of
novel equipment or Modified procedures.
Production of Viscous Fluids The advantage of
the production of heavy oils with ESP units is
the low bubble point pressure of this type of
fluids and so there no free gas at the pump
suction. So the use of the ESP system in this
environment is a favorable approach.
23
ESP non-Standard Conditions
  • Main effects of the increased viscosity of the
    produced fluid
  • Rapid pump capacity decrease
  • Decreased head development by the pump
  • Increased power to drive the pump
  • Reduced pump efficiency
  • If viscosity is not considered when selecting the
    equipment, the ESP unit would be extremely
    overloaded
  • Each pump manufacturer has their own developed
    correction methods

24
ESP non-Standard Conditions
Low Rate Pumps ESPs are designed for high or
extremely high liquid rates, but low-volume
applications are posible to compete with Sucker
ros pumping units In this scenario, ESP system
is posible due to the development on two
áreas Pump stage design and housing strength
improvement Also, deep pump setting led to
modify the pump housing to increase their burst
pressure properties. Those modifications allowed
production at low rate between 150 and 650 bpd,
from more than 10,000 ft deep wells.
25
ESP non-Standard Conditions
Production of Gassy Wells Free gas cannot
produce the same pressure increase as the liquids
due to the much lower density of the gas phase.
Free gas will lead to Fluctuation of pump
output (surging). Cyclic changes in motor
load Finally the control system shuts down the
ESP unit. In sum, specific solutions like
non-standard installation types, gas separators
have to be considered when producing gassy fluids
with ESP systems.
26
ESP non-Standard Conditions
Pump Performance Criteria (gassy wells) The
limits of stable pump operation can be evaluated
based on the calculation of those parameters
27
ESP non-Standard Conditions
Pump Performance Criteria (gassy wells)
The gas void fraction is the percentage of free
gas in the total fluid As seen in the plot, the
amount of free gas handled by the pump increases
with increasing suction pressure, PIP
Turpin Correlation
28
ESP non-Standard Conditions
Solutions (gassy wells) Pump set below
perforations velocity of downward velocity lower
than gas rising velocity (0.5 ft/s), Annulus size
should allow this separation. Requires a rathole
or sump in the well. Any drawback???? High
temperature motors are required! Use of motor
shroud it acts as reverse-flow separator by
changing the flow direction, and directs the flow
along the ESP motor for cooling effects.
29
ESP Solutions gassy wells
  • Required a low fluid velocity (ideal less than
    0.5 ft/s) so gas bubbles may rise through the
    casing annulus.
  • Another option is a dip tube, connected to the
    bottom of the regular shroud the benefits are
  • Improved natural gas separation
  • Production from a restricted area where the ESP
    would not pass
  • Possible to use in horizontal sections (dip tube
    reaching into the horizontal section)

ESP with open-ended shroud
30
ESP Solutions gassy wells
Inverted Shroud fixed below the pump intake
(reverse flow gas separator)
  • Rotary Gas Separators, high speed spinning
    separates the fluids due to differences in
    density.
  • A cross-over device directs
  • Gas into the casing annulus for Venting to the
    surface and 2. liquid to the pump intake
  • And there are much more options..

ESP with Inverted shroud
31
ESP Production of Abrasive Solids
  • It is expected the produced fluids to carry
    solids, which will produce abrasion/erosion of
    the moving parts of the pump (particularly
    impellers), leading to catastrophic failure of
    the pump.
  • Solid-laden fluids production requires special
    technical solutions and sophisticated materials.
    Sand is the most critical problem due to the
    common occurance along with well fluids. Sand
    production facts
  • Usually starts at high rate wells (prime choice
    for ESP systems)
  • Water breakthrough accelerates the process
  • Increases with changes in flow rate

32
ESP Production of Abrasive Solids
  • It is expected the produced fluids with solids,
    (abrasion/erosion of the moving parts)
    impellers.
  • Sand is the most critical problem due to the
    common occurance along with well fluids. Sand
    production facts
  • Usually starts at high rate wells (prime choice
    for ESP systems)
  • Water breakthrough accelerates the process
  • Increases with changes in flow rate

33
ESP Production of Abrasive Solids
Afected áreas in the ESP unit and
Solutions Erosion Impellers and diffusers.
Minimized with special metals (Ni-Resist, alloy
with 18 nickel) or hard surface coatings on
critical areas Axial wear in thrust bearings
and upthrust/downthrust washers. Use tungsten
carbide or ceramics (usually zirconia) in main
thrust bearings Radial abrasion the most
significant sand damage effect in ESP units. Some
solutions Use rubbber (diffuser bore),
hardening of wearing surfaces with tungsten
carbide (expensive), silicon carbide, or
ceramics, they are very brittle though.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com