9 September - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

9 September

Description:

Estimate the time required for each activity. Determine the critical path. ... Introduced by Michael Fagin in 76 (IBM Systems Journal) Formalized process ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: dianepo
Category:
Tags: fagin | september

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 9 September


1
9 September
  • Scheduling (cont.)
  • Contract

2
Pert Charts
3
CPM Critical Path Method
  • Alternative to PERT
  • Dupont 1957
  • Graphical view of project
  • Predicts time required to complete
  • Shows which activities are critical to
    maintaining the schedule

4
Planning
  • PERT
  • CPM
  • Identify the specific activities and milestones.
  • Determine the proper sequence of the activities.
  • Construct a network diagram.
  • Estimate the time required for each activity.
  • Determine the critical path.
  • Update the PERT chart as the project progresses
  • Specify the individual activities.
  • Determine the sequence of those activities.
  • Draw a network diagram.
  • Estimate the completion time for each activity.
  • Identify the critical path (longest path through
    the network)
  • Update the CPM diagram as the project progresses.

5
Gantt Charts
  • Milestone charts
  • Invented by Harvey Gantt in 1916
  • Advantages
  • Less detailed
  • Amenable to management overlays

6
Gantt Chart
7
Gantt Chart with Overlays
8
Scheduling Steps and Tools
  • Put together minimal solution
  • Primary requirements
  • Start with external commitments
  • Product descriptions
  • Milestones
  • Introduce internal milestones
  • Work breakdown structure
  • Product Flow
  • PERT Chart, Gantt chart
  • Focus on the risks
  • Add next level of features where possible
  • Secondary requirements

9
Software Sources
  • Open source tools
  • dmoz.org/Computers/Software/Project_Management/Ope
    n_Source/

10
What needs to be in the plan?
  • Code
  • Design
  • Test
  • Documentation
  • Learning
  • Presentation and demo prep
  • Reviews

11
Reviews and Inspections
  • Why?
  • Developer cant correct unseen errors
  • More eyes to catch problems
  • Earlier is cheaper
  • Integration fix typically 3-10 times the cost at
    design
  • Difference in terms
  • Review implies completed work, often reviewed by
    someone at a different level
  • Inspection implies peer review of work in progress

12
Inspections
  • Introduced by Michael Fagin in 76 (IBM Systems
    Journal)
  • Formalized process
  • Specific roles and steps
  • Heavy preparation and follow-up
  • Used for documents and code

13
Where We Are
  • Understand project
  • Concept
  • Personas and user stories
  • Use cases
  • Requirements
  • Functional Spec
  • How much can be accomplished
  • Project plan
  • Commitment contract
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com