Title: The ADOPTION and DIFFUSION of Innovations
1The ADOPTION and DIFFUSION of Innovations
2The Adoption Process
- The decision stages that focus on internal
consumer influences (psychological/social) that
lead to innovation acceptance/rejection
KNOWLEDGE
PERSUASION
DECISION
TIME
IMPLEMENTATIONS
CONFIRMATION
A micro process
3Steps in the Adoption Process
4Variations from the Normal Adoption Curve
Case in Point Airbus versus Boeings 747
RD years
5The DIFFUSION PROCESS is the spread of an
innovation from its source to the ultimate
consumer that focuses on external forces.
- The key elements of Diffusion are
- an innovation is
- Communicated through certain channels (types of
change agents information) - Over time
- Among the members of a social system (types of
audiences, community).
A macro process
6The Diffusion Process has identified adopter
typologies that are linked to marketing
strategies.
2.5 Innovators
13.5 Early Adopters
34 Early Majority
34 Late Majority
7Diffusion Process, Adopter Categories
- INNOVATORS - are first to buy and typically
described as venturesome, younger, well educated,
financially stable, and willing to take risks.
-
- EARLY ADOPTERS - are local opinion leaders who
read magazines and who are integrate into the
social system more than the average consumer.
8Diffusion Process,Adopter Categories
- EARLY MAJORITY - solid, middle-class consumers
who are more deliberate and cautious - LATE MAJORITY - described as older, more
conservative, traditional, and skeptical of new
products
9Diffusion Process,Adopter Categories
- Laggards
- Resist change
- Conservative
- Like tradition
- Often older lower in socioeconomic status
- Nonadopters
- Refuse to change
OK, we will buy X.
If I have to buy it I will.
No way!
10Diffusion of innovation research traces the
spread of product acceptance across its product
life cycle
Stage customers
Early Adopters
Early Majority
Majority
Laggards
11THE DIFFUSION PROCESSHow different segments of
the market act
- These phases of adoption are important because
they are linked to different marketing strategies
during the product life cycle.
EARLY MAJORITY-34
PER CENT OF TOTAL MARKET
EARLY ADOPTERS-13.5
LAGGARDS (INCLUDING NONADOPTERS)-16
INNOVATIORS-2.5
LATE MAJORITY-34
TIME
12Life-Style Characteristics of Innovators and Non
innovators
Theory
- Characteristics Innovators Non
innovators - Product Interest MORE LESS
- Opinion Leadership MORE LESS
- Personality
- Dogmatism OPEN-MINDED CLOSE-MINDED
- Social Character INNER-DIRECT OTHER-DIRECT
- Category Width BROAD NARROW
- Venturesome ness MORE LESS
- Perceived Risk LESS MORE
13Life-Style Characteristics of Innovators and
Noninnovators
- Characteristics Innovators Noninnovators
- Purchase and Consumption Traits
- Brand Loyalty LESS MORE
- Deal Proneness MORE LESS
- Usage MORE LESS
- Media Habits
- Magazine Exposure MORE LESS
- Television LESS MORE
- Specialized Magazine MORE LESS
14Life-Style Characteristics of Innovators and
Noninnovators
- Characteristics Innovators Non
innovators - Demographic Characteristics
- Age YOUNGER OLDER
- Income MORE LESS
- Education MORE LESS
- Occupational Status MORE LESS
- Social Characteristics
- Social Integration MORE LESS
- Group Members MORE LESS
15Speed of Diffusion
- is influenced by
- Competition Intensity ()
- Channel Coordination (suppliers distributor
reputations) () - Standardization of Technology ()
- () Resource Commitments ()
- Communication in groups outside an individuals
personal network (heterophilous groups) and
communications among peers and family
(homophilous groups)
16Communication in the Diffusion Process
- Trickle Up and Trickle Down
- The transmission of influence between
socioeconomic groups can be described as a
trickle-down process from higher to lower groups
(the traditional view) or a trickle-up process.
Occasionally, a trickle-up direction occurs. For
example, innovators and early adopters of jeans
and of bluegrass and rock music were those in
lower socioeconomic classes.
- 2. Trickle Across
- Since the post World War II period, a leveling
effect in - socioeconomic status has occurred which makes
trickle-down or up - effects less relevant. Mass media now
communicate information on - innovations to all classes. A more likely
process of diffusion is one - that occurs across groups, regardless of
socioeconomic status, - known as a trickle-across effect.
17Communication Flows
- Two-Step Flow of Communication
COMPANYMESSAGE
OPINION LEADERS
TARGET AUDIENCES
18Two-Step Flow of Communication and Adopter
Categories
Early adopters
Early majority
Innovators
Potential target audiences
Product Category Opinion leader(s)
Opinion recipient 1 Opinion recipient 2 Opinion
recipient 3
Company Message from mass media
19Positions of Status
- OPINION LEADER - one who occupies a position of
informal influences over the attitudes and overt
behavior of others. Opinion leadership is earned
not assumed. - CHANGE AGENT - one who occupies a professional
position of formal influence associated with a
given role of status. Change agent status is
assumed, not necessarily earned - FOLLOWER - not a passive patsy. Actively seeks
influence.
20Characteristics of Opinion Leadersin contrast
with their followers
- More like, than unlike, their followers
- More technically competent
- More socially accessible
- More cosmopolitan
- More innovative (receptive to change)
- Higher media exposure (more informed)
- Higher social status
- More conformist with social norms and values
21Generalized Relationships With Innovativeness
Dogmatism, Fatalism
High
Opinion leadership
Independent variables
Income variables
Low
Innov- Early Early
Late Laggards ators adopters
majority majority
22Industrial Firms,Diffusion of Innovation
- Factors related to innovativeness among
industrial firms - 1. Favorable attitude toward scienceas
witnessed by status given scientists in firm. - 2. Cosmopolitanismsas indicated by worldwide
travel of executives and lack of secretiveness. - 3. Adequate information sources
- (a) high subscription levels to scientific
journals - (b) high degree of contact with universities
- 4. High growth rate (sales)
- 5. Lack of shop-floor resistance to innovation
- Source Journal of Industrial Economics (1959)
23The Winds of Change
Total Power Capacity , in Megawatts
Johnson, Keith. In Energy Hunt, Is EU Tilting at
Windmills? WSJ, A13.
24Characteristics That Encourage and Discourage
Diffusion
- Discourage
- Value barrier
- Usage barrier
- Complexity
- Risk barrier
- Encourage
- Relative advantage
- Compatibility with past usage
- Simplicity of use
- Observability
- Trialability
- Divisibility
25Marketing Value Added (2000)(Shareholder
investment Co.s current value)
Characteristics of New Products
RELATIVE ADVANTAGE - is an enhanced bundle of
benefits or clear-cut advantages over existing
offerings ()
- WINNERS Pharmaceutical Companies
- - Innovation against disease
- disability, death
- - new tools to prolong life wellness
26Marketing Value Added ???
- LOSERS Ford, G.M., Chrysler,
- 1950 - cars moved people from A to B
- 2000 - high in car mileage quality ,
- cars still basically move people from A to B
(No fundamental change)
27Characteristics of New Product Success
- Compatibility with existing habits, values and
consumption behavior, similar usage as existing
products
- COMPLEXITY - is a disadvantage for new products
which slows diffusion and may be offset by
simplifying usage or through extensive education
28Characteristics of New Product Success
- Trial abilityexperience or see the newness
- Easily tested
- Low risk
- Inexpensive
- No special equipment
- Free samples or coupons
29Women Buying a New Food Product Within the Last
Month, Their Reasons
30- OBSERVABILITY - is the opportunity for buyers to
see the newness ()
(Field test .. validity??)
31Why Some New Products Fail and Others Succeed
Absolute failure Relative
failure
80 to 90 Fail. Why?
- Unreal time pressure vested interest groups
- Absorption in process lack of objectivity,
courage (risk) - Product Deficiencies (Technical or Design
Problems) - Inadequate research (Overestimation of Market
Size) - Poor Execution of Plans (Promotion, Distribution,
Price, poor timing, etcetera) - Result No differential advantage
Failure to Meet Customer Needs
32Why Some New Products Fail and Others Succeed
80 to 90 Fail. Why?
- 1. Performance Price
- New product failures generally offer the same
or worse performance than competing products
with the same or higher price - 2. Inadequate Market Analysis
New Product Success
- Offer a unique benefit (a differential advantage)
- Solve a consumers problem or provide an
opportunity, a reward