The Status of IceCube - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Status of IceCube

Description:

The Status of IceCube – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: markkr
Category:
Tags: icecube | status

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Status of IceCube


1
The Status of IceCube
  • Mark KrasbergUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
  • RICH 2004 Conference,
  • Playa del Carmen, Mexico
  • Dec 3, 2004

2
IceCube a next generation n observatory a
cubic kilometer successor to AMANDA
  • Detection of Cherenkov light from
  • the charged particles produced when
  • a n interacts with rock or ice
  • Direction reconstructed from
  • the time sequence of signals
  • Energy measurement
  • counting the number of photoelectrons
  • entire waveform read out
  • Expected performance wrt AMANDA
  • increased effective area/volume
  • superior angular resolution
  • superior energy resolution

3
AMANDA-II 19 strings 677 OMs Trigger rate 80
Hz Data years gt2000


Optical Module
PMT looking downward
PMT noise 1 kHz
4
Polar Ice Optical Properties
Scattering
Absorption
Average optical ice parameters ?abs 110 m _at_
400 nm ?sca_eff 20 m _at_ 400 nm
Measurements ?in-situ light sources ?atmospheri
c muons
5
IceCube Science Goals
  • High energy neutrinos from transient sources
    (GRBs and Supernovae)
  • Steady and variable sources of high energy
    neutrinos (AGNs and SNRs)
  • Sources of high energy cosmic rays
  • WIMPs (Dark Matter)
  • Unexpected or exotic phenomena
  • Cosmic Ray Physics

6
IceCube Concept
  • Deep In-Ice Array
  • 80 strings / 60 DOMs each
  • 17 m DOM spacing
  • 125 m between strings
  • hexagonal pattern over 1 km2
  • geometry optimized for detection
  • of TeV PeV (EeV) ns
  • based on measured absorption
  • scattering properties of
  • Antarctic ice for UV blue
  • Cherenkov light
  • Ice Top Surface Array
  • 2 frozen-water tanks
  • (2 DOMs each)
  • above every string

7
Amundsen-Scott South Pole Research Station
8
AMANDA muon event
CC muon neutrino interaction ? track
nm N ? m X
9
Track Reconstruction in Low Noise Environment
1200 m
IceTop
  • Typical event 30 - 100 PMT fired
  • Track length 0.5 - 1.5 km
  • Flight time 4 µsecs
  • Accidental noise pulses
  • 10 p.e. / 5000 PMT / 4 µsec

IceCube
AMANDA
10
Energy Reconstruction
Small detectors Muon energy is difficult to
measure because of fluctuations in dE/dx
IceCube Integration over large
sampling scattering of light reduces the
energy loss fluctuations.
11
t decays
1 PeV t (300m)
nt t
12
n - flavors and energy ranges
pulse
Filled area particle id, direction, energy
Shaded area no particle id
13
IceCube effective area and angular resolution for
muons
further improvement expected using waveform info
Median angular reconstruction uncertainty 0.8?
  • E-2 nm spectrum
  • quality cuts and background suppression (atm m
    reduction by 106)

14
Diffuse Fluxes - Predictions and Limits
Macro
Baikal
Amanda
IceCube Sensitivity after 3 years
15
Point sources event rates
Flux equal to 3x current AMANDA limit dN/dE
10-6E-2/(cm2 sec GeV)
Atmospheric Neutrinos AGN (E-2) Sensitivity (E-2/(cm2 sec GeV))
All sky/year (after quality cuts) 100,000 -
Search bin/year 20 2300 -
3 year Nch gt 40 (E gt 7 TeV) 0.82 1370 2.4 x 10-9
Compared to AMANDA-II 7 times more PMT --gt 50
to 100 times more atmosph. neutrinos _at_ better
angular and energy resolution
16
IceCube Digital Optical Module
17
Digital Optical Module
  • ?
  • records timestamps
  • digitizes waveforms
  • transmits to surface at
  • request via digital
  • communications
  • can do local coincidence
  • triggering

? optical sensor 10 inch Hamamatsu R-7081
  • design requirement
  • Noise rate 1 kHz
  • SN monitoring within
  • our Galaxy

18
  • 2 four-channel ATWDs
  • Analog Transient Waveform Digitizers
  • low-power ASICs
  • recording at 300 MHz over first 0.5ms
  • signal complexity at the start of event

DOM Mainboard
  • fast ADC
  • recording at 40 MHz over 5 ms
  • event duration in ice

HV Board Interface
2xATWD
  • Dead time lt 1
  • Dynamic range
  • - 200 p.e./15 ns
  • - 2000 p.e./5 ms
  • energy measurement (TeV PeV)

FPGA
Memories
  • FPGA (Excalibur/Altera)
  • reads out the ATWD
  • handles communications
  • time stamps waveforms
  • system time stamp resolution 7 ns wrt master
    clock

CPLD
  • oscillator (Corning Frequency Ctl)
  • running at 20 MHz
  • maintains df/f lt 2x10-10

19
DOM Waveform Capture
High Gain
  • Altera Excalibur ARM922t mP 400k gate FPGA on a
    single chip
  • CPU runs data acquisition, testing facility, and
    diagnostic utilities
  • FPGA controls communications interface, time
    critical control of DAQ hardware, fast feature
    extraction of waveforms
  • 2 ATWD each with 4 channels capable of
    digitizing 128 samples at rates from 0.25 1.0
    GHz. 2 of them for ping-pong mode.
  • 3 gain channels in ATWD for complete coverage of
    PMT linear region
  • 10-bit, 40 MHz FADC for capture of extended
    photon showers in the ice (6 ms wide).

Medium Gain
Low Gain
t
? 400 ns window
20
Calibration
  • Calibration of sensors in the lab at temperatures
    between -20 and -55C (deep ice -18C to -42C)
  • LED Flashers on each module, 12 LEDs, in 6
    directions and 2 angles (1010 photons)
  • Special high energy lasers
  • Timing calibration is feature of DOM 5 nsec
  • IceTop High level cross calibration of muon
    tracks with air showers.
  • Shadow of the Moon (at 25 to 30 degree
    elevation) Muon rate of about 1500 Hz will
    allow to calibrate angular resolution in
    astrophysical coordinates in short time scales.

21
DOM Testing

DFL (Dark Freezer Lab) is large, dark, cold
container which holds N test stations (N is
site-dependent) each of which schematically looks
like the figure. Optical fiber system carries
light from optics breadboard (diode laser, LED
pulser, monochromator-tuned lamp) to each
DOM. Optics spreads light evenly out across PMT
photocathode.
22
Dark Freezer laboratory Test all optical
sensors for 2 weeks at temperatures -55C to
20C
23
(No Transcript)
24
PMT HV Calibration
C O U N T S
CHARGE
G A I N
Nominal HV Setting
VOLTAGE
25
Final Acceptance Test Results
  • In-Ice Noise Rate 1 kHz
  • Time Resolution lt 3ns
  • Noise Stability Monitor detected
  • Synchrotron radiation from the SRC,
  • Physical Sciences Lab, Wisconsin

Detection of Synchrotron across the street
26
Triggering on Cosmic Rays
Single PE trigger
Local Coincidence triggering for DOMs with 1.5m
vertical separation
27
Getting to the South Pole
A six hour flight from New Zealand to McMurdo
Station, via C-141 Starlifter
28
A three hour flight from McMurdo to South Pole
Station, via C-130 Hercules
29
Hose-reel with hose,built at Physical Sciences
Laboratory UW-Madison (Nov 2003)
Hose-reel atSouth Pole (Jan 2004)
30
AMANDA
Deployment
31
Summary
  • IceCube is deploying 256 DOMs next month!
  • IceCube is expected to be
  • considerably more sensitive than AMANDA
  • provide new opportunities for discovery
  • with IceTop a unique tool for cosmic ray
    physics

IceCube strings IceTop
tanks 4 8 Jan 2005 16 32 Jan 2006 32 64 Jan
2007 50 100 Jan 2008 68 136 Jan 2009 80 160
Jan 2010
  • Data taking begins early next year

32
IceCube drill camp construction site of the first
hole, Nov 25, 2004
33
  • Bartol Research Institute, Delaware, USA
  • Univ. of Alabama, USA
  • Pennsylvania State University, USA
  • UC Berkeley, USA
  • Clark-Atlanta University, USA
  • Univ. of Maryland, USA
  • IAS, Princeton, USA
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
  • University of Wisconsin-River Falls, USA
  • LBNL, Berkeley, USA
  • University of Kansas, USA
  • Southern University and AM College, Baton
    Rouge, USA

USA (12)
Japan
Europe (12)
Venezuela
  • Chiba university, Japan
  • University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ
  • Universidad Simon Bolivar, Caracas, Venezuela

New Zealand
ANTARCTICA
  • Universität Wuppertal, Germany
  • Uppsala university, Sweden
  • Stockholm university, Sweden
  • Imperial College, London, UK
  • Oxford university, UK
  • Utrecht,university, Netherlands
  • Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
  • Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium
  • Universität Mainz, Germany
  • DESY-Zeuthen, Germany
  • Universität Dortmund, Germany
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com