HFMG Template 607 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

HFMG Template 607

Description:

Iatrogenic pneumothorax rates. Ventilator-associated pneumonia rates. ICU length-of-stay ... Iatrogenic Pneumothorax. PLAN: Operational analysis: Residents place CVC's ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: HFH57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HFMG Template 607


1
Demystifying the Competencies
Barbara L. Joyce, Ph.D.
2
Objectives
  • Identify examples of educational content for each
    of the competencies
  • Identify an assessment system for your program
  • Identify a program improvement plan for your
    program

3
What does the ACGME expect?
  • Your program should document and demonstrate
  • Learning opportunities in each competency domain
  • Evidence of multiple assessment methods
  • Use of aggregate data to improve the educational
    program

4
The Six Competencies
  • Medical Knowledge
  • Patient Care
  • Practice-based Learning and Improvement
  • Systems-based Practice
  • Interpersonal and Communication Skills
  • Professionalism

5
Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
  • Quality Improvement
  • Evidence based medicine
  • Teaching others (patients, students, junior
    residents)
  • Developing habits of life long learning and self
    reflection

PDSA Cycle Quality Improvement
6
What does this look like in different specialties
  • Evidence-based Medicine (EBM)
  • Internal Medicine
  • Course in Basics of EBM and Journal Club with
    specific format residents evaluated
  • Online modules through Sladen Library on
    Information Literacy
  • Teaching Others
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Didactics and workshop in being an effective
    teacher
  • Residents evaluated on teaching skills by medical
    students
  • Lectures given by residents evaluated by
    participants
  • QI Activities
  • Pathology
  • Residents form teams and actively engage in
    process improvement to reduce wait time for
    patients getting results from breast biopsy
    Participate in Quality Expo
  • OB/GYN
  • M M drives quality improvement activities of
    residents
  • Internal Medicine
  • PIM Modules
  • Development of learning plans
  • Review by PD at biannual meeting

7
Practice-Based Learning and ImprovementSelf
Assessment
  • Do residents actively participate in Quality
    Improvement initiatives?
  • Do you have an EBM based Journal Club? Do you
    use EBM when teaching?
  • Do you have structured activities where residents
    learn to teach others?
  • How do residents reflect on and improve their
    practice?
  • Do residents develop learning plans to review
    with mentor/PD?
  • Do you have an assessment tool for assessing a
    residents teaching skills?

Reflect
8
Systems-Based Practice
  • Understanding the Health Care Delivery System
  • Patient Advocacy
  • Working in Inter-professional Teams
  • Patient Safety

9
What does this look like in different specialties?
  • Cost effective health care
  • Allergy Immunology
  • Review of prescribing patterns of faculty and
    fellows discussion and recommendations to
    pharmacy re formulary
  • Family Medicine
  • Practice management curriculum
  • Interprofessional Teamwork
  • Internal Medicine
  • Collaborative Rounding
  • General Surgery
  • In Situ Simulation
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Mock codes
  • Patient Safety and Advocacy
  • All
  • Residents present root cause analysis of near
    miss or sentinel event residents attend
    sentinel event committees
  • Link M M conferences to all six competency
    domains or QI projects
  • Understanding the healthcare system
  • All
  • Inform and engage residents in the national
    healthcare debate
  • Didactics on insurance, billing coding,
    performance metrics (pay for performance),
    disease/case management

10
Systems-Based PracticeSelf Assessment
  • Do residents have a learning activity that
    addresses interprofessional teamwork?
  • Do residents have a learning activity that
    addresses patient advocacy?
  • Do residents actively participate in M M?
  • Do residents have a learning activity that
    addresses
  • Cost containment
  • Risk-benefit analysis

Reflect
11
Interpersonal and Communication Skills
  • Communication with patients and families
  • Communication with colleagues and other health
    professionals
  • Written and scholarly communication

12
What does this look like in different specialties?
  • Communication with Colleagues
  • Internal Medicine
  • Standardized handoff (ISWITCH)
  • Diagnostic Radiology
  • Clinical and didactic online teaching about
    providing effective consultations
  • Written Communication
  • All
  • Communication with Patients and Families
  • Institutional Curriculum
  • Informed Consent
  • Delivering Bad News
  • Disclosure of Errors
  • Hand off
  • Family Medicine
  • Workshop role plays around setting an agenda for
    the visit
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Didactics with role play on abuse screening,
    managing angry patients and families, screening
    for depression, alcohol

13
Interpersonal and Communication SkillsSelf
Assessment
  • What experiential learning activity do residents
    engage in to learn communication skills with
    patients and families?
  • What experiential learning activity do residents
    engage in to learn teamwork
  • How do residents learn scholarly communication ?
  • Do you routinely review residents medical
    records and give written feedback?

Reflect
14
Professionalism
  • Demonstrating respect, compassion and integrity
  • Commitment to ethical principles
  • Being respectful of diversity

15
What does this look like in different specialties?
  • AMA Virtual Mentor
  • Ethics Conference
  • Clinical teaching which actively embeds ethical
    issues (futility of treatment) into discussion
  • Role modeling mentoring

16
ProfessionalismSelf Assessment
  • Do residents have an experiential activity that
    addresses ethics?
  • How is the development of professional behavior
    taught?
  • What kinds of conversations do faculty have with
    residents re professional behavior?
  • Describe the remediation process

Reflect
17
Assessment
  • How do I know a resident
  • is competent?

18
Why Is This Important?
19
Assessment Pearls
  • Assess residents longitudinally
  • Use multiple evaluations
  • Use multiple evaluators who give different
    perspectives

20
And in the end
You have enough data to paint a picture of
competence
21
What is an assessment system?
  • An assessment system
  • Is a collection of assessment tools that measure
    a residents performance
  • Defines who the evaluators are
  • Describes what performance will be evaluated
  • Indicates how often the evaluation occurs

22
A Core Assessment System
23
A Core Assessment System
24
Global Clinical Performance Ratingsaka End of
Rotation Evaluation
  • Most common form of assessment in residency
    programs
  • Align questions with key components of the
    competencies
  • Most often ratings are inaccurate
  • Add behavioral anchors
  • Train faculty
  • Least effective in predicting a good doctor

25
Behavioral Anchors
26
Multisource Feedbackaka 360
  • Evaluation of resident by multiple individuals
    such as self, peers, nurses, technicians, allied
    health professionals, and patients
  • Provides multiple perspectives of residents
    performance
  • Provides opportunity for residents to improve
    self-assessment skills

27
Direct Focused Observation The Most Important
Form of Assessment!!!!!!
  • Observation of Patient Care Encounter
  • SEGUE
  • Communication Checklist
  • Mini-CEX
  • Observation of Procedural Skill
  • OSATS

28
CognitiveProcedure/Case Logs
  • Cognitive
  • In-training exams
  • Multiple Choice exams
  • Procedure/Case Logs

29
Portfolio
  • A collection of authentic and diverse evidence
    representing what a person has learned over
    timeused to demonstrate competence and
    reflection on learning.
  • Lewis 2007

30
Portfolio ? File
31
Portfolio
  • Structured component
  • External assessments of performance
  • Reflective component
  • Creative piece(s) that are learner driven
  • Reflection and self-assessment of contents
  • Used as a learning tool
  • Formative feedback
  • Resident and faculty-driven process
  • Continuous

32
Learning Plans
  • Promote self reflection
  • Encourages the resident participation in
    defining their learning goals
  • Promotes life long self directed learning

33
Other Forms of Assessment
  • Peer Evaluation
  • Chart audit
  • Simulation/OSCEs/In Situ Simulation
  • Mock orals
  • .and many others

34
Program Improvement
Using aggregate data
Where does this data come from?
Aggregate what?
Lets not re-invent the wheel
I dont have time!!

35
Phase 3Outcome Project
36
Why is program improvement important?
  • Focuses faculty and residents on a shared vision
    for the educational program
  • Identifies effective educational practices within
    the program
  • Identifies educational practices in need of
    improvement
  • Communicates educational effectiveness to
    external stakeholders (GMEC, hospital
    administration, ACGME)
  • Metrics are useful for recruitment

37
What is Program Evaluation and Improvement?
  • Program evaluation
  • Systematic evaluation of the residency program
    using multiple sources of data
  • Program improvement
  • Determining an improvement plan
  • Measuring improvement over time

38
Two Components
One Process
  • Program evaluation
  • Program improvement

39
Next Steps
  • Identify program performance indicators
  • Organize the indicators
  • Determine performance standards
  • Develop an action plan for improvement

40
Departmental Performance Indicators
  • Core Performance Indicators
  • Performance on in-training exams compared to
    national average
  • Rolling board certification pass rate
  • Resident evaluation of educational program
  • Faculty evaluation of educational program
  • Resident evaluation of faculty
  • Alumni surveys (1 year)
  • Case and/or procedure logs
  • Cycle length and number of citations by GMEC or
    ACGME
  • Faculty Development
  • Recommended or required by ACGME

41
Additional Departmental Performance Indicators
  • Program evaluations done by residents (aggregate)
  • Group performance on specialty specific or
    program performance standards
  • of procedures of specific cases overall in
    training exam scores
  • ACGME Resident survey
  • Institutional Surveys
  • Areas in need of improvement
  • (rotation evaluations faculty evaluations focus
    group)
  • Match rate
  • Number of scientific presentations/publications
  • Patient satisfaction surveys

42
Clinical Outcome Measures
  • The Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine fellowship
    at Henry Ford Hospital compared their ICU
    clinical outcomes to national benchmarks
  • Patient severity of illness
  • Severity-adjusted mortality rates
  • Sepsis-specific mortality rates
  • Iatrogenic pneumothorax rates
  • Ventilator-associated pneumonia rates
  • ICU length-of-stay
  • Catheter-related blood-stream infections

43
Methods
  • Reinforce practice patterns and knowledge for
    outcomes better than benchmark data
  • Incorporate a PDSA cycle to clinical processes
    where outcomes are worse than benchmark data
  • Identify roles of key elements
  • Educational components
  • Personnel
  • Environmental factors
  • Involve learners in PDSA cycle

44
Iatrogenic Pneumothorax
  • PLAN
  • Operational analysis Residents place CVCs
  • Resources were directed toward improving
    technical performance of this procedure
  • DO
  • Expand educational curriculum
  • Add simulation training
  • STUDY
  • Rates improved
  • Specific program elements reviewed
  • ACT
  • Expand use of ultrasound guidance, PICCs

45
Pneumothorax rate Occurences / Patients-at-risk
46
Sepsis-specific Mortality Rates
  • PLAN
  • Review of provider knowledge Good
  • Strategies were focused on implementation of
    therapy
  • DO
  • Incorporate a sepsis bundle of five
    interventions
  • STUDY
  • Bundle compliance initially low, but feedback
    helped
  • Rates improved
  • ACT
  • Rapid Response Team now initiates sepsis bundle
    on the general practice units

47
Henry Ford Hospital Sepsis Mortality
Sepsis Bundled Initiated June 2006
July 2007
Sepsis Bundle Compliance
  • Mich. Hosp Assoc. expected 13.5
  • Henry Ford Hospital
  • July 2007 11.5
  • 2004 vs. 2007(YTD) 29

48
Performance Better Than Benchmarks
49
Develop an action plan
  • Programs required to have yearly curriculum
    review
  • Programs required to document action plan
  • Document that action plan!!

50
Questions?
  • Barbara Joyce, Ph.D. bjoyce2_at_hfhs.org
  • 313-916-9161
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com