Title: 2nd EMES International Conference on Social Enterprise
12nd EMES International Conference on Social
Enterprise Trento, 3 July 2009 Co-operative
stakeholders Who counts in co-operatives, and
how? Dr. Caroline Gijselinckx Cera Centre for
Co-operative Entrepreneurship Higher Institute of
Labour Studies Catholic University of Leuven
2Outline
- Research questions and evidence
- Stakeholder theory
- Whose stakes are taken into account and how, in
co-operatives ? - theoretically
- empirical evidence on belgian co-operatives
- Challenges and new avenues for stakeholder
involvement in cooperatives
3Research questions
- Theory
- Constitution of co-operatives
- - institutionalization of member dialogue and
participation - natural inclination toward
stakeholder management, albeit not - necessarily multi-stakeholder management
- Legal frameworks
- Stimulating multi-stakeholder co-operatives
- Questions
- Empirical evidence who counts in
co-operatives, and how? - Stakeholder models among co-operatives?
4Empirical evidence
From Belgium (), gathered through Survey on
co-operatives (2006, N175) In-depth interviews
(2005, N16) Focus groups (2008, N10 and 9
participants respectively) () Co-operatives
in Belgium 40 000 companies with legal form of
co-operative 558 accredited by National Council
of Co-operatives (April, 2008) asked for an
accreditation meeting 5 criteria -
voluntary membership - equal voting rights
for all members or restriction of voting
rights at general assembly - restricted
dividend (max. 6) - patronage dividend for
members pro rata transactions
5Stakeholder theory
- The concept of stakeholder
- Refers to a claimant toward whom an organization
has fiduciary - responsibility (Bryson, 2003)
- Those individuals or groups that are influenced
by or have in influence on the activities of an
organization (Freeman, 1984) - Identification and typification of stakeholders
- internal and external stakeholders (Rousseau
Shperling, 2003) - stakeholders by design and natural
stakeholders (Tirole, 2001) - typology of stakeholders according to attributes
power, legitimacy, - urgence (Mitchell, Agle Wood, 1997)
- basic structure of stakeholder model according to
elements influencing the outcome and components
of the relationship between an organization and
its stakeholders (Jonker Foster, 2002) - Strong and weak versions of stakeholder
management (Leys, Van Opstal Gijselinckx, 2009)
6Who counts in co-operatives and how?
- THEORETICALLY
- In virtue of specific constitution of a
co-operative stakeholder dialogue - is institutionalized in co-operatives
- Co-operatives are member-organizations
- Members involvement and participation in
governance - Co-operative members have a double identity user
and owner - Members are both dominant and ultimate
stakeholder (cf. Mitchell, - Agle Wood, 1997)
- Members are both stakeholder by design and
natural stakeholder - (cf. Tirole, 2003)
- Potential for strong version of stakeholder
management, but not - necessarily so
- Spectrum of stakeholder involvement in
co-operatives, - Inspired by the spectrum of levels of public
participation (International Association for
Public Participation) - information consultation involvement
collaboration empowerment
7Who counts in co-operatives and how?
Spectrum of stakeholder involvement in
co-operatives
strong
weak
8Who counts in co-operatives and how?
- EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE from Belgium
- Member involvement
- core characteristic of a cooperative
- importance of sufficient, clear and transparant
information - development of member advantages
- democratic member participation
- - In general assembly, board of directors, other
channels of - participation
- - Tendency the bigger the co-operative, the
lesser the active - participation
- - Decentralized member participation in big
cooperatives - - Key-members with key position appointed in
decision making - founding members
- social organizations
9Who counts in co-operatives and how?
- Employees
- 50 gives them voice in general assembly
- 25 gives them voice in board of directors
- 18 information and consultation of employees
- In social purpose companies workers
participation is required, but - experienced to be difficult to organize
- Financiers
- 26 invites them for the general assembly
- 17 invites them for meetings of the board of
directors - Other stakeholders mentioned as such
- Other co-operative enterprises (mentioned by 30
of cooperatives in survey) - Social organizations (mentioned by 29 of
co-operatives surveyed) - Other non-co-operative enterprises (mentioned by
24 of co-operative surveyed) - Trade unions (16)
- Governments and local governments (14)
10Who counts in co-operatives and how?
- Corporate social responsibility in co-operatives
- Item list of PASO survey in Flanders used in
survey on accredited - cooperatives
- More than 70 of the co-operative employers take
one or more measures with respect to health and
safety at work, workers participation and
work-family life balance - 47 of co-operatives surveyed takes measures with
respect to - transparancy, support of social projects,
support of cultural projects, respect for local
community and culture, public health and safety,
North-South relationships - 39 of co-operatives surveyed takes measures with
respect to the - protection or preservation of the environment
(most importantly waste - recycling)
- Tendency the bigger the co-operative, the more
measures (under - control for activity sector and
employer/non-employer status) - Half of those cooperatives who do not take any of
these measures are - small machingering rings
11Who counts in co-operatives and how?
- Socialization of profit
- by 11 of co-operatives in survey (all but 1
in service sector) - sponsoring (72)
- donations (44)
- other methods mentioned
- - price reductions for disadvantaged
people, - - special awards for employees,
- - patronage dividend for non-member
customers, - - making risk social investements with a
low interest rate
12Who counts in co-operatives and how?
- General pattern
- model 1 seems to be predominant
- some co-operatives seem to be moving towards
models 2 and 3 -
- Members as primary stakeholders
- Potential for strong form of multi-stakeholdership
(multiple types of members) - Single type member co-operative
- but co-operatives historically and
pragmatically are single member - type organizations therefore predominance of
model 1 - Multiple type member co-operatives
- - employees difficult realization of
participation in other types of co- - operatives than worker co-operatives (also
when obliged in social purpose companies) - - re-discovery of co-operative model by
individuals as well as social - movements and social organizations/movements
- - preliminary attempts to set up
multi-stakeholder-member co-operatives - most importantly in social services and
sustainable energy)
13Who counts in co-operatives and how?
- CHALLENGES
- With respect to controlling stakeholders
(members) - For all types of stakeholder models
- Tendency of hampering of member and stakeholder
management in - professional boards (consisting of external
directors) - - can be solved by requisting that board members
become members of - the co-operative and establishing mixed
boards - For multiple stakeholder-member model
- Deadlocks in decision making
- Conflicting interests
- In case of one member one vote principle and
multiple types of - members tendency of the largest category to
dominate the organization - - can be solved by giving certain types of
members a stronger voice - With respect to non-controlling stakeholders
(non-members) - protection of non-controlling stakeholders/non-mem
bers - - through flat claims and exit options
- - through structural linkage with social
organizations/movements
14- CONTACT
- Dr. Caroline Gijselinckx
- Research Manager Civil Society and Social Economy
Research Group - Coordinator Cera Centre for Co-operative
Entrepreneurship - HIVA K.U.Leuven
- Parkstraat 47
- 3000 Leuven
- Belgium
- Tel. 00 32 16 32 33 28
- Fax 00 32 16 32 33 44
- www.cooperatiefondernemen.be