An introduction to technology-oriented agreements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

An introduction to technology-oriented agreements

Description:

EU continues on cap-and-trade track. United States: might not sign up to an ... ITER fusion reactor. Cost sharing within IEA Implementing Agreements (IEA-IA) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: TIL81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An introduction to technology-oriented agreements


1
An introduction to technology-oriented agreements
  • Heleen de Coninck (ECN/IVM)
  • ECN side-event COP13 December 7th, 2007

2
Background status post-2012
  • Agreement to agree. But on what?
  • EU continues on cap-and-trade track
  • United States might not sign up to an
    international carbon cap
  • US Congress difficulty to agree on meaningful
    climate act
  • US Senate not favourable to cap-and-trade
    (filibustering)
  • Emerging economies no strict commitments
  • A post-2012 treaty a la Kyoto with broad Annex-I
    participation unlikely
  • Complex patchwork of treaties more conducive,
    including cap-and-trade, sectoral and technology
    agreements
  • Question
  • What can we expect from sectoral and technology
    agreements?

3
Alternative or complement to cap-and-trade?
  • Disinterest in cap-and-trade can be explained for
    countries with low climate change impacts and
    high mitigation costs
  • Provision of a global public good free-rider
    incentives
  • Sectoral agreements (IEA, Pew Center) and TOAs
    might provide participation incentives
  • Predictable costs
  • Innovation market failure
  • Potentially smaller number of parties (club good)
  • Interests of current technology leaders
    (first-mover advantage)
  • and large developing countries (targeted and more
    effective technology transfer)

4
Context and forms of TOAs
  • International agreements that are aimed at
    advancing specific technologies
  • Four types
  • Knowledge sharing and coordination
  • Research, development and demonstration
  • Technology transfer
  • Technology mandates, standards and incentives

5
Context and forms of TOAs
Type 1 Knowledge sharing and coordination Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF) and the International Platform on the Hydrogen Economy (IPHE) Methane to Markets Partnership (M2M) Task sharing within IEA Implementing Agreements (IEA-IA) Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP) Energy Star bilateral agreements
Type 2 RDD European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) ITER fusion reactor Cost sharing within IEA Implementing Agreements (IEA-IA) The Solvent Refined Coal II Demonstration Project (SRC-II)
Type 3 Technology transfer Multilateral Fund under the Montreal Protocol Global Environment Facility (GEF)
Type 4 Technology incentives, mandates, standards International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) European Union Renewables Directive
6
Context and forms of TOAs - conclusions
  • Knowledge sharing and coordination, and RDD
    (Types 1 and 2) not environmentally effective on
    their own, but can be useful for low-cost or
    underdeveloped technologies
  • Technology transfer agreements (Type 3) can be
    effective if substantial funds committed, but
    unlikely to be sufficient in scope on their own
  • Technology incentives, mandates and standards
    (Type 4) can be environmentally effective on
    their own, although in most cases less
    cost-effective than cap-and-trade approaches

7
Context and forms of TOAs - conclusions
  • Type-4 agreements may be more effective for
  • Sectors with significant ancillary benefits
  • Highly trade-sensitive sectors
  • Sectors not covered by cap-and-trade systems
  • Sectors that might benefit from international
    coordination

8
Conclusions
  • Technology-oriented agreements can take many
    forms and can be appealing for different reasons,
    e.g. more manageable number of actors, greater
    cost predictability, innovation benefits, large
    emission reductions
  • It makes sense to explore TOAs, as they may offer
    political advantages
  • However, global cost-effectiveness and simplicity
    of one global cap-and-trade are sacrificed
  • In order to be environmentally effective, TOAs
    should primarily be aimed at technological
    implementation (Type-4)
  • It is possible to pursue such agreements without
    straying from the cap-and-trade track

9
Thank you
  • More information and report copies
  • Heleen de Coninck
  • Energy research Centre of the Netherlands
  • Unit Policy Studies
  • Radarport 60/P.O.Box 56890
  • 1040 AW Amsterdam
  • deconinck_at_ecn.nl
  • Tel. 31-224-564316
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com