afea 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

afea 1

Description:

This study analyses information spillover effects and shock ... Kurtosis. Skewness. Std. Mean. Table 2. Descriptive Statistics (Returns) Methodology (1) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: ROU75
Category:
Tags: afea | kurtosis

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: afea 1


1
IAME 2006 CONFERENCE MELBOURNE, 12-14JULY 20006
Market Interactions and Volatility Spillover
Effects Between Shipping, Oil and Stock Markets
Andreas MERIKAS Professor of Finance Shipping
Studies Dpt., University of Piraeus Theodore
SYRIOPOULOS Assistant Professor of
Finance Shipping, Trade and Transport Dpt.,
University of the Aegean Efthimios ROUMPIS Ph.D.
Candidate
2
Contents
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Literature Review
  • Data and Descriptive Statistics
  • Methodology
  • Empirical Results
  • Conclusions

3
ABSTRACT
This study analyses information spillover effects
and shock transmission between shipping, oil and
stock markets. A VAR(1)-bivariate BEKK GARCH(1,1)
model is employed to estimate dynamic conditional
volatility and correlations between these
markets. The empirical evidence supports market
interactions and volatility spillover effects
between the shipping, oil and stock markets.
Different shipping market segments exhibit
varying degrees of dynamic volatility response
and lead-lag behavior with the other markets.
This exercise is considered to be useful, as the
empirical findings have implications for
efficient corporate decisions, risk management
and hedging strategies.
4
Introduction
  • Major sources of risk in shipping industry
  • - Freight rates volatility, bunker prices,
    vessel values, Interest rates
  • Any shocks in these risk factors can have a
    profound impact on shipping companies
    operational cost, cash-flow surplus,
    profitability and market value
  • At first, we investigate the robustness of any
    dynamic relationships, interdependencies and
    volatility spillover effects between shipping and
    oil markets.
  • Also, we include major international stock
    markets in our study, because we expect that
  • - Business cycle swings and economic growth
    fluctuations are affected by shocks in the oil
    markets, and appear to exert a similar impact on
    shipping and stock markets
  • - The role of stock markets as a
    market-driven corporate valuation mechanism has
    been upgraded in recent years
  • This paper contributes to the financial
    literature in a number of ways
  • - It investigates the dynamic pattern of
    volatility in the shipping, oil and stock markets
  • - The attempt to jointly model dynamic
    volatility spillover effects between these
    markets is an innovative contribution that has
    not been undertaken previously
  • - The empirical methodology is founded on
    recent developments in the field of multivariate
    generalized conditional heteroscedasticity
    (MGARCH) models (Alexander, 2001).

5
Literature Review (1)
  • A body of recent empirical research is based
    on the MGARCH models in order to investigate
    volatility interactions, spillover effects
    and shock transmission between underlying markets
    and/or instruments (e.g. Fleming et al., 1998
    Kearney and Patton, 2000 Ganon and Yeung, 2004)
  • Volatility in freight rates, vessel size
    class, bunker oil prices, operational flexibility
    and interest and exchange rates have been
    identified as major risk factors in shipping
    industry (e.g. Kavussanos, 1997, 2003 Glen and
    Martin, 1998 Chen and Wang, 2004 Syriopoulos
    and Roumpis, 2006 inter alia).
  • A thin body of research has focused on
    volatility dynamics and spillover effects between
    spot and forward shipping markets as well as
    bunker oil and shipping markets (e.g. Kavussanos
    and Nomikos,2003, Alizadeh and Nomikos, 2004a,
    2004b)
  • Futures prices tend to discover new
    information more rapidly than spot prices in the
    freight markets (Kavussanos and Nomikos,2003)
  • Alizadeh and Nomikos (2004a) study the dynamic
    relationship between oil futures and spot markets
    and tanker freight rates across two major tanker
    routes. They find no evidence to support the
    existence of a relationship between tanker
    freight rates and physical-futures differentials
    in the crude oil market

6
Literature Review (2)
  • A number of studies investigate the dynamic
    linkages and information spillover effects
    between oil price volatility and financial
    markets (Malik and Hammoudeh, 2006, Ciner, 2002,
    Huang et al.,1996)
  • Malik and Hammoudeh (2006) used a bivariate
    GARCH model to analyze volatility and shock
    transmission among US equity, global crude oil
    markets and equity markets of Saudi Arabia,
    Kuwait, and Bahrain. The results show significant
    transmission effects among second moments
  • Ciner (2002) adopts nonlinear causality tests
    to examine the dynamic linkages between oil
    prices and the stock market. He suggests that oil
    price shocks affect stock index returns, which is
    consistent with the documented influence of oil
    on economic output

7
Data and Descriptive Statistics (1)
  • Our dataset consist of weekly frequencies and
    covers the period running from January 5th 1990
    to February 25th 2005
  • Worldscale freight rates for the
    transportation of 250.000 tons (VLCC ship) for
    the following tanker shipping markets
  • - Middle East Gulf to Japan (MEGJ), from Ras
    Tanura to Chiba
  • - West Africa to US Atlantic Coast (WAUS),
    from Off Shore Bonny to Philadelphia
  • - North Sea to Continent (NOSC), from Sullom
    Voe to Wilhelmshaven
  • We include spot prices on the two primarily
    crude oil markets
  • - Brent Crude oil
  • - West Texas Intermediate (WTI)
  • For the market portfolio, we include the
    Standard Poors-500 (SP500) composite index

8
Data and Descriptive Statistics (2)
9
Methodology (1)
We employ the BEKK model for the parameterization
of the conditional variance-covariance matrix
(Baba et al., 1987 Engle and Kroner, 1995)
Ht C?C A?et-1 e?t-1 A B?Ht-1B
where C is a n x n upper triangular matrix, A and
B are n x n coefficient matrices. the elements
aij of matrix A measure the degree of innovation
from market i to market j and the elements ßij of
matrix B indicate the persistence in conditional
volatility between market i and market j. This
can be expressed for the bivariate BEKK model as
Under the assumption of conditional normality,
the model can be estimated by maximizing of the
following log-likelihood function
10
Methodology (2)
The conditional mean return, rt, is modeled in a
vector autoregressive (VAR) framework
ei,t?It-1 ? N(0,Ht)
where, ?(L), d(L), f(L) and ?(L) denote lag
polynomials of order p the vector of error
terms, eit, represents the unexpected excess
return on market i (i 1, 2) and is assumed to
be normally distributed (denoted as N) with the
conditional variance-covariance matrix Ht and,
It-1 is the information set at time t-1.
11
Empirical Results (1)
  • The full BEKK GARCH(1,1) model appears to
    perform reasonably well and most coefficients
    appear to be significant
  • The bivariate VAR(1) model of shipping and oil
    market returns indicates some interaction effects
  • The variance-covariance structure of the
    shipping and oil markets reflects information
    shocks and volatility spillover effects. In the
    conditional tanker variance equation, h11,t, the
    coefficients a11 and a21 are significant. This
    implies that both lagged squared freight rate
    shocks and lagged squared oil shocks affect the
    conditional freight rate variance
  • Significant volatility spillover effects are
    predominantly found between the VLCC market and
    the WTI market and past volatility in one market
    appears to have a feedback impact to the
    volatility of the other market
  • In the case of smaller vessel classes of the
    Suezmax and Aframax market segments, volatility
    spillover effects are mainly detected with the
    Brent market
  • The VLCC, Suezmax and Aframax segments, both,
    lagged squared freight rate shocks and past
    variance affect current tanker freight rate
    variance

12
Empirical Results (2)
  • The examination of interactions between
    shipping and stock markets reveals dynamic
    volatility effects mainly between stock market
    shocks and the VLCC and Suezmax segments
  • The stock market and oil market are found to
    exert spillover effects in both the mean and
    variance equations
  • Increase in Brent oil market returns has an
    adverse impact on stock market returns (SP500
    index), probably due to expectations for a
    potential growth slowdown
  • In the variance equation statistically
    significant interactions are found mainly between
    the stock market and the Brent oil market
    cross-effects (ß12, ß21) point to volatility
    increase in one market due to spillover effects
    from the other markets

13
Empirical Results (3)
14
Empirical Results (4)
15
Empirical Results (5)
16
Conclusions
  • This study has attempted to offer an
    innovative perspective on explaining dynamic
    market interactions between the shipping, oil and
    stock markets
  • The first (mean) and second (variance) moments
    of the underlying markets were jointly modelled
    in a VAR(1) - bivariate full BEKK GARCH(1,1)
    approach
  • The empirical results indicate significant
    information spillover effects of varying degrees
    between the markets of interest
  • The past innovations exert an impact on
    current volatility levels, and the past values of
    the own conditional variance also matter
  • The VLCC segment was found to be sensitive to
    WTI oil price changes, whereas Suezmax and
    Aframax markets to Brent oil price volatility
  • The tanker market was found to be relatively
    sensitive to stock market volatility as robust
    economic activity is a key driver for both
    markets
  • Dynamic volatility effects were mainly
    revealed between stock market shocks and the VLCC
    and Suezmax segments
  • The stock and oil markets were found to
    exhibit spillover effects in both the mean and
    variance equations. An upward movement in (Brent)
    oil market has an adverse impact on stock market
    (SP500) returns, probably due to expectations of
    potential growth slowdown
  • The current empirical findings could be
    further expanded by bringing the respective
    forward markets into the discussion.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com