Validate PHRU high level findings across a wider, senior audience Identify and agree the effectivene - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Validate PHRU high level findings across a wider, senior audience Identify and agree the effectivene

Description:

Validate PHRU high level' findings across a wider, senior audience ... Trainees, locum and agency staff. Increasing patient safety issues ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Sue94
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Validate PHRU high level findings across a wider, senior audience Identify and agree the effectivene


1
Lessons Learned - Workshop Objectives
  • Validate PHRU high level findings across a
    wider, senior audienceIdentify and agree the
    effectiveness of enabler mechanisms in delivering
    current successes and how to take these
    forwardIdentify omissions and barriers to
    Quality MKs whole system approach and agree
    measures to tackle and overcome themAgree areas
    of priority to embed sustainability

2
Workshop Outline
  • 14.00 Welcome Dr Nicola Smith
  • 14.05 Aiming for Higher Quality of Care and
    Longer, Happier, Healthier Lives - Graham Ball,
    Deputy C/E, MK PCT
  • 14.10 Workshop Objectives and Structure -
    Alistair Robertson
  • 14.20 Qualitative Evaluation, Early Findings
    Kate Saffin, PHRU
  • 14.40 Group Discussion and Feedback
  • 15.10 Enabling Change and Overcoming Barriers
    Groupwork
  • 15.30 Gallery Feedback
  • 15.50 Working towards Sustainability in
    Embedding a Whole
  • Systems Approach
  • 16.15 Feedback
  • 16.25 Summary Dr Nicola Smith
  • 16.30 Close

3
1. THE CHALLENGE
4
Courtesy of Bill Runciman, APSF Data extracted
from AHRQ 2006 report
5
Wrong plan nearly 50 of the timeHarm a
patient with 10 of admissionsThe harm is
permanent or severe with 2 of admissionsDeath
is associated with the harm in 1/300
patientsThis amounts to 100,000 preventable
deaths since 1995 (Australia alone)Costs as much
as 1 million /hour (Australia alone)Data
courtesy of Professor Jeff Richardson, CHE,
Monash University and Professor Runciman,
Professorial Research Fellow, Patient Safety,
University of Adelaide
UK and Australia
6
OR put another way
  • The equivalent of a jumbo jet crashing every week
    with over 300 UK citizens on board

7
2.BARRIERS
  • Information and technology overload
  • Growing information base
  • Specialty silos
  • Communication issues
  • Clinical governance
  • Plethora of guidelines
  • Trainees, locum and agency staff
  • Increasing patient safety issues
  • Less patient time, more referrals
  • Medical errors
  • Rising cost of claims

8
Reasons for resisting change
  • Information problems
  • Individual decision-making
  • Effects of stress
  • Getting the right people together
  • The status quo

Getting evidence into practice
9
View from the frontline
  • 2. Skills
  • Low levels of baseline skills in using IT
  • Low levels of baseline skills in critical
    appraisal
  • Insufficient time for clinicians to acquire new
    skills
  • 1. Access
  • Inadequate access to information
  • Lack of relevant evidence

10
View from the frontline
  • 3. Funding
  • Insufficient money to help clinicians to acquire
    new skills
  • 4. Hierarchy
  • Problems relating to medical and nursing
    hierarchies
  • 5. Autonomy Perceived threats to medical
    autonomy

11
3. TOOLS WE CAN USE
  • 1. All groups involved
  • 2. Characteristics of the change
  • that might influence its adoption
  • 3. Readiness of health professionals
  • in the target group to change
  • 4. Potential external barriers to change
  • 5. Likely enabling factors
  • (including resources and skills)

12
Tools we can use Barriers scale
  • Benefits of change
  • Quality of research
  • Access to research
  • Resources
  • Organisational culture
  • Staffing issues
  • Personal feelings
  • Adopter
  • Organization
  • Innovation
  • Communication process

13
Tools we can use the power of Evidence
  • 80 of physicians changed their care as a result
    of evidence - as follows
  • Avoided hospitalisation in 12
  • Reduced overall length of stay in hospital in 19
  • Changed diagnostic tests in 51 and drug choices
    in 45
  • Avoided additional tests or procedures in 49
  • Adhering to evidence-based guidelines for
    treating hypertension alone could save at least
    1.2 billion annually in US
  • Marshall J G. . The Rochester study.
  • Fischer MA, Avorn J. Economic implications of
    E-B-based prescribing for hypertension

14
Emerging themes group discussion of the findings
  • What themes have resonated with you from Kates
    presentation?
  • Are there any other themes you can identify from
    your own experience?

15
Enabling change and overcoming barriers group
discussion
  • What were/are the enablers and why were they
    effective?
  • What were/are the barriers and how did/are you
    overcome them?

16
Working towards greater sustainability in
embedding a whole systems approach what do we
need to focus on?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com