Title: Text Messaging and Literacy
1- Text Messaging and Literacy
- Emma Jackson, Lucy Hart, Clare Wood and Bev
Plester.
2Text Messaging and Literacy
- Why look at phone use?
- According to the Mobile Data Association, in 2008
78.9 billion text messages were sent in the UK. - Ofcoms (2006) media literacy audit revealed that
49 of 8-11 year olds had their own phones - 82 of 8-11 year olds sent texts
- Our current research suggests that in the UK some
children are as young as five-years-old when they
receive their first mobile phone. - In 2008 93 of 227 UK 9-11 year olds either had
their own mobile phone (69) or could use someone
elses freely, - 54 reported texting more than talking only 26
reported talking more than texting.
3Text Messaging and Literacy
- Widespread concern over impact of textisms on
literacy standards. - Texters are vandals who are doing to our
language what Genghis Khan did to his neighbours
800 years ago - (John Humphreys writing in the Daily Mail, 28th
September 2007). - Scotsman.com has a short article titled, Mobile
phone warning. It reads - Examiners yesterday issued a new warning on text
messaging, saying that abbreviated phone texting
and street slang are to blame for deteriorating
levels of spelling and grammar. - Even bright pupils were making almost
unforgivable mistakes with simple words
4Text Messaging and Literacy
- Cell Phone Texting Can Endanger Spelling
- Posted Dec 6th, 2007 Peter Woronoff
- Mobile phones are rampant these days even third
graders have them for communication, and games.
These gadgets are a lot more expensive and
advanced than the cell phones that their parents
possessed at their age. - These kids are knowledgeable and creative with
mobile texting. Sadly, "shorts," or short cuts
used, influence their success in spelling. Even
when chatting on the internet, they make use of
these trends. - This alarms educators. There are numerous people
involved in texting these days. The popularity of
SMS (short message sending) captivates both young
and the old. There is no problem among older
people because their spelling skills are more
established.
5Text Messaging and Literacy
- Children are more prone to commit errors because
they have read less, and prefer to play games, or
watch TV, etc. Much of their time is influenced
by what is going on in their environment. So we
have to be watchful that they not look stupid
because they cannot spell simple common words.
Texting has come along with a flourish, making a
big impact among them. This habit forming menace
can influence kids to spell incorrectly or get
confused about the correct usage. -
- We should not tolerate these activities, else it
might endanger their progress. Many common daily
words have been shortened by SMS. It is likely
that it might affect much of their ability to
spell, since their minds are in the formation
stage. - Can we find means to minimize their use or remind
them that texting dulls spelling? A
large part of the problem are the media ads that
glamorize these already popular habits.
6What is a textism
- Shortenings - bro tues
- Contractions - txt hmwrk
- G-clippings - swimmin goin
- Other clippings - hav wil
- Missing apostrophes - cant dads
- Acronyms - BBC UK
- Initialisms - ttfn tvm lol
- Symbols - _at_ ? lt) xxx
- Homophones - 2moro l8r
- Misspellings - comming
- Unconventional spellings - fone rite skool
- Accent stylisation - wiv elp anuva gonna
- (Adapted from Thurlow, 2003)
7Plester, Wood Bell (2008)
- Study 1
- Are there differences in the academic abilities
of children who send text messages and those who
do not? - 65 11 and 12-year-old children
- 78.5 had sole use of a mobile
- Assessed on Cognitive Abilities Test
- Translation of standard and text sentences
- Grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors
added together as English errors in the
translation of the text message into English - Ratio of textisms to total words used calculated
in translations of standard sentence in textspeak.
8Plester, Wood Bell (2008)
- Children who didnt text scored significantly
higher on the verbal CAT but - Children who used the greatest proportion of
textisms in the translation exercise had the best
verbal reasoning performance (p.007) - Children with the greatest proportion of textisms
also had the lowest non-verbal reasoning
performance (p-.001) - No difference in textism ratio across the three
messaging groups.
9Plester, Wood Bell (2008)
- So what about standard spelling ability?
- Study 2
- If the textisms are detrimental, then knowledge /
use of them should be negatively correlated with
spelling ability. - Followed up with 35 children who completed
- British Ability Scales assessment of spelling
- Textspeak to English Translation
- English to Text Message Translation
- Positive association found between spelling and
textism use (p.001). - Textisms categorised into different forms, and
the most phonetic forms were significantly
related to spelling ability, and these two forms
alone could predict 32.9 of the variance in
spelling scores.
10Plester, Wood Bell (2008)
- Intriguing results
- Texting per se seemed to be associated negatively
with literacy but textism use appears to be
associated with verbal ability generally and
spelling ability specifically. - Children with greater verbal ability seem to be
most able to exploit textisms - So, is the relationship between spelling and
textism use attributable to general verbal
ability? - Or, could it be that textism use is linking to
phonological awareness development - Crucial skill that underpins literacy
development.
11Plester, Wood Joshi (2009)
- Needed a more detailed analysis of the
relationships between verbal ability,
phonological awareness, spelling and reading
attainment. - Study 3
- 88 10-11 year-old children assessed on
- Vocabulary
- Short term memory
- Reading
- Spelling
- Phonological awareness
- Text message composition (scenario based)
12Plester, Wood Joshi (2009)
- Textism use was significantly associated with
reading ability and phonological awareness - Just short of significance with spelling this
time - Phonological awareness does mediate some of the
relationship between textism use and reading
ability - But
- Textism use was still able to account for a
significant amount of variance in reading ability
after phonological awareness, alphabetic decoding
ability, short term memory, and the age at which
the children got their first mobile phone were
accounted for (p.035) - Textism use is adding value to reading skills
- Ludic language use?
13Plester, Wood Joshi (2009)
14Wood, Plester Bowyer (2008)
- Currently working on a British Academy funded
project looking longitudinally at natural text
messaging and literacy outcomes over an academic
year. - Study 4
- 63 children completed a full year of testing so
far, recruited from Years 4,5,6 and 7. - Should have 119 children by July.
- All have their own mobile phones
- Assessed on
- Verbal IQ
- Phonological awareness
- Reading
- Spelling
- Textism use
15Wood, Plester Bowyer (2008)
- Textism use at the beginning of the year was
associated with - Reading (time 1) r.366 .339 including this
years data - Spelling (time 1) r.426 .270 including this
years data - Non Word Reading (time 1) r.306 .206
including this years data - Phonological awareness (time 1) r.382 .189
including this years data - Reading (time 2) r.291
- Spelling (time 2) r.280
- Phonological Awareness (time 2) r.351
- Textism use could predict (after accounting for
IQ) - Reading, R2 change.050, p.043
- Phonological Awareness, R2 change.093, p.013
- Literacy skills could not predict textism use
- Textism use drives PA and reading development,
not the other way around
16Current Intervention Study
- Becta Funded Small-Scale Intervention
- Study 5
- Considering the impact of texting on literacy
skills by providing mobile phones to 9-10 year
old children who do not have their own. - Monitoring their impact on literacy skills over
an academic term. - Issues around teachers perceptions of mobile
phones and mobile phone use on school premises.
17Intervention Study
18Intervention Study
19Intervention Study
20Intervention Study
21Intervention Study
22Intervention Study
23Fluency Scores
24Current Work
IN PRAISE OF TXTING ABBRVTNS Â Â Â Â Â You look at a
letter written by a 17th or 18th century letter
writer, and you'll see far more abbreviation.