Text Messaging and Literacy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Text Messaging and Literacy

Description:

Text Messaging and Literacy – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: georg326
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Text Messaging and Literacy


1
  • Text Messaging and Literacy
  • Emma Jackson, Lucy Hart, Clare Wood and Bev
    Plester.

2
Text Messaging and Literacy
  • Why look at phone use?
  • According to the Mobile Data Association, in 2008
    78.9 billion text messages were sent in the UK.
  • Ofcoms (2006) media literacy audit revealed that
    49 of 8-11 year olds had their own phones
  • 82 of 8-11 year olds sent texts
  • Our current research suggests that in the UK some
    children are as young as five-years-old when they
    receive their first mobile phone.
  • In 2008 93 of 227 UK 9-11 year olds either had
    their own mobile phone (69) or could use someone
    elses freely,
  • 54 reported texting more than talking only 26
    reported talking more than texting.

3
Text Messaging and Literacy
  • Widespread concern over impact of textisms on
    literacy standards.
  • Texters are vandals who are doing to our
    language what Genghis Khan did to his neighbours
    800 years ago
  • (John Humphreys writing in the Daily Mail, 28th
    September 2007).
  • Scotsman.com has a short article titled, Mobile
    phone warning. It reads
  • Examiners yesterday issued a new warning on text
    messaging, saying that abbreviated phone texting
    and street slang are to blame for deteriorating
    levels of spelling and grammar.
  • Even bright pupils were making almost
    unforgivable mistakes with simple words

4
Text Messaging and Literacy
  • Cell Phone Texting Can Endanger Spelling
  • Posted Dec 6th, 2007 Peter Woronoff
  • Mobile phones are rampant these days even third
    graders have them for communication, and games.
    These gadgets are a lot more expensive and
    advanced than the cell phones that their parents
    possessed at their age.
  • These kids are knowledgeable and creative with
    mobile texting. Sadly, "shorts," or short cuts
    used, influence their success in spelling. Even
    when chatting on the internet, they make use of
    these trends.
  • This alarms educators. There are numerous people
    involved in texting these days. The popularity of
    SMS (short message sending) captivates both young
    and the old. There is no problem among older
    people because their spelling skills are more
    established.

5
Text Messaging and Literacy
  • Children are more prone to commit errors because
    they have read less, and prefer to play games, or
    watch TV, etc. Much of their time is influenced
    by what is going on in their environment. So we
    have to be watchful that they not look stupid
    because they cannot spell simple common words.
    Texting has come along with a flourish, making a
    big impact among them. This habit forming menace
    can influence kids to spell incorrectly or get
    confused about the correct usage.
  • We should not tolerate these activities, else it
    might endanger their progress. Many common daily
    words have been shortened by SMS. It is likely
    that it might affect much of their ability to
    spell, since their minds are in the formation
    stage.
  • Can we find means to minimize their use or remind
    them that texting dulls spelling? A
    large part of the problem are the media ads that
    glamorize these already popular habits.

6
What is a textism
  • Shortenings - bro tues
  • Contractions - txt hmwrk
  • G-clippings - swimmin goin
  • Other clippings - hav wil
  • Missing apostrophes - cant dads
  • Acronyms - BBC UK
  • Initialisms - ttfn tvm lol
  • Symbols - _at_ ? lt) xxx
  • Homophones - 2moro l8r
  • Misspellings - comming
  • Unconventional spellings - fone rite skool
  • Accent stylisation - wiv elp anuva gonna
  • (Adapted from Thurlow, 2003)

7
Plester, Wood Bell (2008)
  • Study 1
  • Are there differences in the academic abilities
    of children who send text messages and those who
    do not?
  • 65 11 and 12-year-old children
  • 78.5 had sole use of a mobile
  • Assessed on Cognitive Abilities Test
  • Translation of standard and text sentences
  • Grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors
    added together as English errors in the
    translation of the text message into English
  • Ratio of textisms to total words used calculated
    in translations of standard sentence in textspeak.

8
Plester, Wood Bell (2008)
  • Children who didnt text scored significantly
    higher on the verbal CAT but
  • Children who used the greatest proportion of
    textisms in the translation exercise had the best
    verbal reasoning performance (p.007)
  • Children with the greatest proportion of textisms
    also had the lowest non-verbal reasoning
    performance (p-.001)
  • No difference in textism ratio across the three
    messaging groups.

9
Plester, Wood Bell (2008)
  • So what about standard spelling ability?
  • Study 2
  • If the textisms are detrimental, then knowledge /
    use of them should be negatively correlated with
    spelling ability.
  • Followed up with 35 children who completed
  • British Ability Scales assessment of spelling
  • Textspeak to English Translation
  • English to Text Message Translation
  • Positive association found between spelling and
    textism use (p.001).
  • Textisms categorised into different forms, and
    the most phonetic forms were significantly
    related to spelling ability, and these two forms
    alone could predict 32.9 of the variance in
    spelling scores.

10
Plester, Wood Bell (2008)
  • Intriguing results
  • Texting per se seemed to be associated negatively
    with literacy but textism use appears to be
    associated with verbal ability generally and
    spelling ability specifically.
  • Children with greater verbal ability seem to be
    most able to exploit textisms
  • So, is the relationship between spelling and
    textism use attributable to general verbal
    ability?
  • Or, could it be that textism use is linking to
    phonological awareness development
  • Crucial skill that underpins literacy
    development.

11
Plester, Wood Joshi (2009)
  • Needed a more detailed analysis of the
    relationships between verbal ability,
    phonological awareness, spelling and reading
    attainment.
  • Study 3
  • 88 10-11 year-old children assessed on
  • Vocabulary
  • Short term memory
  • Reading
  • Spelling
  • Phonological awareness
  • Text message composition (scenario based)

12
Plester, Wood Joshi (2009)
  • Textism use was significantly associated with
    reading ability and phonological awareness
  • Just short of significance with spelling this
    time
  • Phonological awareness does mediate some of the
    relationship between textism use and reading
    ability
  • But
  • Textism use was still able to account for a
    significant amount of variance in reading ability
    after phonological awareness, alphabetic decoding
    ability, short term memory, and the age at which
    the children got their first mobile phone were
    accounted for (p.035)
  • Textism use is adding value to reading skills
  • Ludic language use?

13
Plester, Wood Joshi (2009)
14
Wood, Plester Bowyer (2008)
  • Currently working on a British Academy funded
    project looking longitudinally at natural text
    messaging and literacy outcomes over an academic
    year.
  • Study 4
  • 63 children completed a full year of testing so
    far, recruited from Years 4,5,6 and 7.
  • Should have 119 children by July.
  • All have their own mobile phones
  • Assessed on
  • Verbal IQ
  • Phonological awareness
  • Reading
  • Spelling
  • Textism use

15
Wood, Plester Bowyer (2008)
  • Textism use at the beginning of the year was
    associated with
  • Reading (time 1) r.366 .339 including this
    years data
  • Spelling (time 1) r.426 .270 including this
    years data
  • Non Word Reading (time 1) r.306 .206
    including this years data
  • Phonological awareness (time 1) r.382 .189
    including this years data
  • Reading (time 2) r.291
  • Spelling (time 2) r.280
  • Phonological Awareness (time 2) r.351
  • Textism use could predict (after accounting for
    IQ)
  • Reading, R2 change.050, p.043
  • Phonological Awareness, R2 change.093, p.013
  • Literacy skills could not predict textism use
  • Textism use drives PA and reading development,
    not the other way around

16
Current Intervention Study
  • Becta Funded Small-Scale Intervention
  • Study 5
  • Considering the impact of texting on literacy
    skills by providing mobile phones to 9-10 year
    old children who do not have their own.
  • Monitoring their impact on literacy skills over
    an academic term.
  • Issues around teachers perceptions of mobile
    phones and mobile phone use on school premises.

17
Intervention Study
18
Intervention Study
19
Intervention Study
20
Intervention Study
21
Intervention Study
22
Intervention Study
23
Fluency Scores
24
Current Work
IN PRAISE OF TXTING ABBRVTNS       You look at a
letter written by a 17th or 18th century letter
writer, and you'll see far more abbreviation.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com