Project%20Military%20Veterans

1
Presentation to the Joint Standing Committee on
Defence 04 MAY 2007
2

• HR OFFICE ISSUES
• STATS ON PERSONNEL PER ARM OF SERVICE (ARMY, AIR
  FORCE, NAVY AND SAMHS).
• BREAKDOWN OF PERSONNEL WRT POPULATION DEMOGRAPHY.
• STATS ON PENSIONED PERSONNEL.
• RELATIONSHIP WITH NATIONAL TREASURY.

ISSUES RAISED BY THE JOINT STANDING COMMITTEE
2
3

• NSF PENSION ISSUES
• STATS ON PERSONNEL RECEIVING SPECIAL PENSION AND
  NSF PENSION.
• EXPLANATION OF POLICY ON NSF PENSION AND ITS
  RATIONALE.
• ARE PENSIONS PROCESSED IN TIME IN LIAISON WITH
  OTHER RELEVANT PENSION OFFICES
• ARE THERE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AN ALTERNATIVE
  FEASIBLE PENSION SCHEME FOR THE MILITARY.

ISSUES RAISED BY THE JOINT STANDING COMMITTEE
(CONT)
3
4

• NSF PENSION ISSUES
• HOW MANY FORMER NON-STATUTORY MILITARY PERSONNEL
  HAVE EXITED THE SANDF AND WHAT WERE THE REASONS
• STATS ON LEGIBLE MEMBERS WHO ARE NOT YET
  BENEFICIARIES.

ISSUES RAISED BY THE JOINT STANDING COMMITTEE
(CONT)
4
5

• SERVICE CORPS/MILITARY VETERANS ISSUES
• WHAT TYPE OF TRAINING IS PROVIDED TO PERSONNEL
  WHO ARE ON THEIR WAY OUT OF THE SANDF
• ARE THE COURSES SAQA COMPLIANT
• WHAT PROJECTS ARE FUNCTIONING TO SUSTAIN AND
  IMPROVE THE LIFEHOOD CONDITIONS OF VETERANS AND
  PENSIONED MILITARY PERSONNEL. WHAT OTHER TRAINING
  SKILLS HAVE BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO EMPOWER
  PENSIONED PERSONNEL.
• WHAT OTHER TRAINING SKILLS HAVE BEEN MADE
  AVAILABLE TO EMPOWER PENSIONED PERSONNEL.
• WHICH AGENCIES PROVIDE TRAINING FOR VETERAN
  PERSONNEL.

ISSUES RAISED BY THE JOINT STANDING COMMITTEE
(CONT)
5
6

• SERVICE CORPS/MILITARY VETERANS ISSUES
• ARE THE CETIFICATES THAT ARE ISSUED COMPLIANT
  WITH SAQA REQUIREMENTS
• WHO ARE THE SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR PROJECTS AND
  TRAINING
• WHAT BUDGET DID THE DOD SET ASIDE FOR THE SERVICE
  CORPS FROM THE YEAR 2000 - 2006
• IS THERE ANY ALLOCATION FOR THIS FINANCIAL YEAR
  2007-2008
• WHAT OTHER SPONSORSHIP IS AVAILABLE
  INTERNATIONALLY AND LOCALLY TO ASSIST THE CAUSE
  OF THESE VETERANS, AILING PERSONNEL AND RETIRED
  PERSONNEL

ISSUES RAISED BY THE JOINT STANDING COMMITTEE
(CONT)
6
7
To brief the Joint Standing Committee on the
demographic composition of the DOD, the NSF
Pension Project , the Administration of Military
Veterans Affairs and the Service Corps.
AIM
7
8
DEMOGRAPHIC COMPOSITION OF THE DOD
8
9
SANDF RACE-RANK DISTRIBUTION AS AT 01 APRIL 2007
(29)
(32)
(50)
(62)
(62)
(49)
(37)
(20)
(15)
(24)
(67)
(50)
(36)
(14)
(7)
(6)
(3)
(12)
(10)
9
76 Black (African, Coloured Indian)
Def Rev
24 White
10
SANDF GENDER DISTRIBUTION PER RANK AS AT 01 APRIL
07
(100)
(100)
(3)
(97)
(10)
(90)
(14)
(86)
(20)
(80)
(28)
(72)
(64)
(36)
(32)
(68)
(43)
(57)
(11)
(89)
(14)
(86)
(82)
(18)
(21)
(79)
(17)
(83)
(17)
(83)
(17)
(83)
(18)
(82)
(35)
(65)
(100)
Macro Gender
10
81 Male
19 Female
11
DOD RACE DISTRIBUTION FOR 1994, 1996 AND 01 APRIL
2007
1994
1996
WHITES 37827
WHITES 33455
(45.7)
(33.1)
INDIANS 842
(1.0)
INDIANS 938
COLOURED 12983
(0.9)
(15.7)
COLOURED 11999
AFRICANS 54718
(11.9)
(54.1)
AFRICANS 31053
TOTAL 101 110
(37.5)
TOTAL 82 705
DEFENCE REVIEW GUIDELINE
01 APRIL 2007
Indians
Whites
918
14903
WHITES 17045
(1)
(19)
(24.4)
AFRICANS 45276
(64.7)
Coloured
COLOURED 7154
(10.2)
9850
(13)
Africans
INDIANS 525
51754
(0.8)
(67)
TOTAL 70 000
TOTAL 77 425
12
DOD GENDER DISTRIBUTION FOR 1994, 1996 AND 2007
1994
1996
MALE 66361
(80.2)
MALE 83210
(82.3)
FEMALE 16344
(19.8)
FEMALE 17900
TOTAL 82 705
(17.7)
TOTAL 101 110
FEB 2007
MALE 59150
(76.)
FEMALE 18275
(24)
TOTAL 77 425
12
13
SA ARMY RACE-RANK DISTRIBUTION AS AT 01 APRIL
2007
(100)
(80)
(20)
(68)
(32)
(54)
(46)
(52)
(48)
(57)
(43)
(33)
(67)
(89)
(11)
(4)
(96)
(75)
(25)
(50)
(50)
(27)
(59)
(69)
(31)
(10)
(90)
(95)
(5)
(97)
(3)
(1)
(99)
(100)
(14)
(86)
Def Rev
14
SA ARMY (BH) GENDER DISTRIBUTION PER RANK 01
APRIL 07
(100)
(100)
(4)
(96)
(5)
(95)
(9)
(91)
(14)
(86)
(16)
(84)
(20)
(80)
(40)
(60)
(5)
(95)
(11)
(89)
(13)
(87)
(11)
(89)
(10)
(90)
(90)
(10)
(12)
(88)
(15)
(85)
(100)
(100)

Macro Gender
14
15
SA AIR FORCE RACE-RANK DISTRIBUTION AS AT 01
APRIL 07
(100)
(75)
(25)
(38)
(61)
(76)
(24)
(80)
(20)
(30)
(70)
(46)
(54)
(64)
(36)
(81)
(19)
(50)
(50)
(10)
(90)
(73)
(27)
(40)
(60)
(74)
(26)
(85)
(15)
(19)
(81)
(86)
(14)
(100)
Def Rev
16
SAAF (BH) GENDER DISTRIBUTION PER RANK 01 APRIL
07
(100)
(100)
(11)
(89)
(6)
(94)
(12)
(88)
(80)
(20)
(20)
(80)
(21)
(79)
(6)
(94)
(19)
(81)
(8)
(92)
(12)
(88)
(81)
(19)
(16)
(84)
(89)
(11)
(80)
(20)
(24)
(76)
(100)
Macro Gender
16
17
SA NAVY RACE-RANK DISTRIBUTION AS AT 01 APRIL 2007
(100)
(25)
(75)
(33)
(67)
(23)
(77)
(37)
(63)
(52)
(48)
(64)
(36)
(25)
(75)
(87)
(13)
(100)
(37)
(63)
(39)
(61)
(76)
(24)
(86)
(14)
(87)
(13)
(90)
(10)
(89)
(11)
(89)
(11)
Def Rev
18
SA NAVY(BH) GENDER DISTRIBUTION PER RANK 01
APRIL 2007
(100)
(100)
(92)
(8)
(89)
(11)
(91)
(9)
(83)
(19)
(90)
(10)
(29)
(71)
(72)
(28)
(33)
(67)
(94)
(6)
(11)
(89)
(92)
(8)
(85)
(15)
(78)
(22)
(26)
(74)
(28)
(72)
(100)

Macro Gender
18
19
SAMHS RACE-RANK DISTRIBUTION AS AT 01 April 2007
(100)
(67)
(33)
(39)
(61)
(37)
(63)
(37)
(63)
(47)
(53)
(64)
(36)
(71)
(29)
(83)
(17)
(89)
(11)
(57)
(43)
(68)
(32)
(80)
(20)
(10)
(90)
(92)
(8)
(13)
(87)
(4)
(96)
(85)
(15)
(100)
Def Rev
20
SAMHS (BH) GENDER DISTRIBUTION PER RANK 01
APRIL 2007
(100)
(79)
(22)
(78)
(35)
(65)
(52)
(48)
(60)
(40)
(32)
(68)
(34)
(66)
(70)
(30)
(33)
(67)
(65)
(35)
(62)
(38)
(54)
(46)
(59)
(41)
(48)
(52)
(54)
(46)
(54)
(46)
(83)
(17)
(100)

Macro Gender
20
21
PSAP RACE-RANK DISTRIBUTION AS AT 01 APRIL 2007
(100)
(67)
(100)
(39)
(37)
(75)
(25)
(37)
(47)
(31)
(69)
(64)
(71)
(63)
(37)
(83)
(89)
(68)
(32)
(57)
(68)
(43)
(57)
(80)
(43)
(90)
(57)
(92)
(37)
(63)
(87)
(96)
(85)
(98)
(2)
Def Rev
76 Black (African, Coloured Indian)
24 White
21
22
PSAP GENDER DISTRIBUTION PER RANK 01 APRIL 2007
(100)
(50)
(50)
(37)
(63)
75)
(25)
(28)
(71)
(43)
(57)
(45)
(55)
(27)
(73)
(33)
(67)

Macro Gender
22
56 Male
44 Female
23
23
24
24
25
NSF PENSION DISPENSATION
25
26
BACKGROUND

• PREVIOUS SERVICE OF FORMER STATUTORY FORCE
  MEMBERS WAS RECOGNIZED FOR PENSION PURPOSES
• DISPARITY BETWEEN FORMER NON-STATUTORY FORCE
  MEMBERS AND FORMER STATUTORY FORCE MEMBERS IN AS
  FAR AS PENSION BENEFITS ARE CONCERNED

26
27
BACKGROUND (CONT)

• INTENTION OF THE NSF PENSION DISPENSATION IS TO
  ADDRESS THE DISPARITY BETWEEN FORMER
  NON-STATUTORY FORCE AND FORMER STATUTORY FORCE IN
  THE DOD IN AS FAR AS PENSION BENEFITS ARE
  CONCERNED

27
28
BACKGROUND (CONT)

• THE DOD NSF PENSION PROJECT WAS ESTABLISHED TO
  IMPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE NSF PENSION
  BENEFITS
• THIS ADMINISTRATION IS DONE IN SUPPORT OF THE NSF
  PENSION PROJECT AT GEPF ( NATIONAL TREASURY)

28
29
POLICY FRAMEWORK

• DEFINITIONS
• NON-STATUTORY FORCE MEMBER
• FORMER MK/APLA MEMBER WHO ENTERED INTO EMPLOYMENT
  AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE EITHER
  AS A PUBLIC SERVICE ACT PERSONNEL (PSAP) MEMBER
  OR AS A DEFENCE ACT (UNIFORM) PERSONNEL MEMBER
  THROUGH INTEGRATION OR NORMAL PERSONNEL
  ACQUISITION PROCESS.

29
30
POLICY FRAMEWORK (CONT)

• NON-STATUTORY FORCE SERVICE
• THE PERIOD BETWEEN THE DATE ON WHICH THE NSF
  MEMBERS JOINED THEIR RESPECTIVE FORMER FORCES AND
  THE DATE OF THEIR TAKING UP EMPLOYMENT WITH
  DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE
• IF JOINED FORMER NSF BEFORE AGE 16, THE SERVICE
  WILL START FROM AGE 16.

30
31
POLICY FRAMEWORK (CONT)

• WHO QUALIFIES FOR NSF PENSION
• FORMER MK/APLA MEMBER WHO
• ENTERED INTO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE
  DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE OR ANY STATE DEPT
• EITHER AS A PUBLIC SERVICE ACT PERSONNEL (PSAP)
  MEMBER OR AS A DEFENCE ACT (UNIFORM) PERSONNEL
  MEMBER ON OR BEFORE 31 MARCH 2002
• THROUGH INTEGRATION OR NORMAL PERSONNEL
  ACQUISITION PROCESS.

31
32
MEMBERS WHO DO NOT QUALIFY

• FORMER NSF MEMBERS WHO
• DEMOBILISED
• RECEIVED BENEFITS IN TERMS OF DEMOBILISATION ACT
  99 OF 1996
• DID NOT TAKE UP EMPLOYMENT WITH ANY OF THE STATE
  DEPARTMENTS THAT PARTICIPATE IN THE GEPF

32
33
RECOGNITION

• MEMBERS WITH LESS THAN 10 YEARS NSF SERVICE
• 50 OF THE SERVICE WILL BE RECOGNISED
• PROVIDED MEMBER MEETS HIS/HER FULL FINANCIAL
  OBLIGATION

33
34
RECOGNITION (CONT)

• MEMBERS WITH 10 OR MORE NSF SERVICE
• 100 OF THE SERVICE WILL BE RECOGNISED
• PROVIDED MEMBER MEETS HIS/HER FULL FINANCIAL
  OBLIGATION

34
35
NSF PENSION VS SP PENSION

• CHOICE BETWEEN NSF PENSION BENEFITS AND SPECIAL
  PENSIONS BENEFITS
• OPTION TO RETAIN SPECIAL PENSIONS BENEFITS -
  FORFEIT THE RIGHT TO BE CONSIDERED FOR NSF
  PENSIONS BENEFITS
• OPTION TO FORFEIT SPECIAL PENSIONS BENEFITS IN
  FAVOUR OF NSF PENSION BENEFITS

35
36
MEMBER OPTIONS

• PAY BACK THE SPECIAL PENSIONS BENEFIT AMOUNT
  RECEIVED
• MONTHLY SPECIAL PENSIONS BENEFIT WILL STOP
• IF CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY BACK SPECIAL PENSIONS
  BENEFIT, NSF SERVICE WILL BE REDUCED ACCORDINGLY

36
37
MEMBER OPTIONS

• NSF SERVICE REDUCTION FOR SP BENEFIT RECEIVED
• 15 YEARS NSF SERVICE
• RECEIVED R30 000 SP BENEFIT
• 1 YEAR SERVICE R10 000
• NSF SERVICE TO BE REDUCED BY 3 YEARS
• THEREFORE WILL BE LEFT WITH 12 YEARS NSF SERVICE

37
38
DEMOB BENEFIT VS NSF PENSION

• IMPACT OF DEMOBILIZATION BENEFITS ON NSF PENSION
  BENEFITS

38
39
MEMBER OPTIONS

• PAY BACK THE DEMOB BENEFIT AMOUNT RECEIVED
• IF CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY BACK DEMOB BENEFIT, NSF
  SERVICE WILL BE REDUCED ACCORDINGLY

39
40
COST OF BUYING NSF SERVICE

• 5 OF MEMBERS FINAL SALARY(31st May 2000)
• THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MEMBER
• THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TOTAL COST AND THE
  MEMBERS PORTION
• THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE STATE

40
41

• MEMBER CONTRIBUTION (EXAMPLE)
• FORMULA (5 x Final salary x NSF Service)
  MEMBER CONTRIBUTION)
• NSF SERVICE 8 YEARS
• FINAL SALARY R58 000
• MEMBER CONTRIBUTION R23 200

COST OF BUYING NSF SERVICE
41
42
MEMBER OPTIONS 5

• PAY 5 NSF MEMBER CONTRIBUTION
• ONCE-OFF LUMP SUM,
• INSTALLMENTS, OR
• BOTH LUMP SUM AND INSTALLMENT
• MEMBER CAN CHOOSE TO PAY A PORTION OF THE 5 NSF
  MEMBER CONTRIBUTION
• IF CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY THE 5 NSF MEMBER
  CONTRIBUTION, THE NSF SERVICE WILL BE REDUCED
  ACCORDINGLY

42
43
MEMBER OPTIONS

• NSF SERVICE REDUCTION FOR MEMBER CONTRIBUTION
• 15 YEARS NSF SERVICE
• MEMBER CONTRIBUTION R43 500
• 1 YEAR SERVICE R10 000
• MEMBER CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY R40 000 (PAID R3 500)
• NSF SERVICE TO BE REDUCED BY 4 YEARS
• THEREFORE WILL BE LEFT WITH 11 YEARS NSF SERVICE

43
44
44
45
STATISTICS
SERVING MEMBERS 12091
EXITED MEMBERS 9280
TOTAL 21371
45
46
EXITED MEMBERS
Exit Type Qualifying members Payments by GEPF Outstanding Payments
Retired 742 232 510
Deceased 2763 383 2380
Package 409 84 325
Resign / Discharge 5366 816 4550
Total 9280 1515 7765
46
47
CHALLENGES INTERNAL

• MEMBERS WITHOUT VALID ADDRESSES
• LIVING MEMBER 569
• DECEASED MEMBERS 318
• (LIAISON TOOK PLACE WITH HOME AFFAIRS VERY
  LITTLE RESULTS)
• LETTERS SENT TO UNITS 62 MEMBERS RESPONDED
• NSF JOINING DATES DISPUTES - 3057
• DISPUTES RESOLVED - 706

47
48
POLICY ISSUES

• 5 MEMBER OWN CONTRIBUTION PLUS ADDED INTERESTS
• MEMBERS LESS THAN 10 YEARS SERVICE ONLY 50
  RECOGNITION
• NSF PENSION RECOGNITION VS SPECIAL PENSION
  DEDUCTION
• LETTER WRITTEN TO MOD FOR POLITICAL INTERVENTION

48
49
ALTERNATIVE PENSION SCHEME

• DEPARTMENT STILL EXPLORING THE POSSIBILITY OF
  DEVELOPING AN ALTERNATIVE PENSION SCHEME FOR THE
  MILITARY
• HOWEVER THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE AND
  ADMINISTRATION HAS EXPRESSED SOME DIFFERENCE OF
  OPINION ON THIS MATTER

49
50
MILITARY VETERANS AFFAIRS ADMINISTRATION
50
51
BACKGROUND

• AS PART OF THE INTEGRATION PROCESS IN TERMS OF
  THE SEVEN DIFFERENT MILITARY FORMATIONS IN 1994
  THE FOLLOWING ACTS OF RESOLUTION WERE INSTITUTED
• DEMOBILISATION
• BACKDATING OF SERVICE CERTIFICATES
• SPECIAL PENSION
• REDRESS IN RESPECT OF SPECIAL LEAVE

51
52
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

• THE APPOINTMENT OF THE ADVISORY BOARD ON MILITARY
  VETERANS AFFAIRS AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE
  DIRECTORATE MILITARY VETERANS AFFAIRS WAS
  PRONOUNCES BY THE ACT OF PARLIAMENT THROUGH THE
  PROMULGATIONS OF THE MILITARY VETERANS ACT, ACT
  17 OF 1999

52
53
NSF MIL VET PROJECT PRINCIPLES

• DOL/NSF FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION RM56
• PROJECT EXCECUTED BY SASSETA
• SKILLS DEVELOPMENT
• FOCUS AREAS
• DESTITUTE VETERANS
• TRAINING LINKED TO EMPLOYMENT
• TRAINING IS STILL UNDERWAY

53
54
VETERANS PROJECTS

• DATABASE POPULATING DOD (DMVA)
• KZN
• COFFIN MAKING PROJECT
• AGRICULTURAL PROJECTS
• WORKING FOR WATER
• LIMPOPO
• POULTRY PROJECT
• STONE CRUSHING PROJECT

54
55
VETERANS PROJECTS (CONT)

• IMPOPHOMA/MGWENYE PROJECT
• EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES BY SENWES
• FURNITURE MAKING IN HAMMANSKRAAL
• NATIONAL HOUSING PROJECT
• OPERATION VUSELELA (WORKING FOR WATER)
• EASTERN CAPE
• ENGCOBO AGRICULTURAL PROJECT
• POULTRY FARMING IN BUTTERWORTH
• ABATTOIR AND FEEDLOT PROJECT PLANNED IN
  NQUBANQUBA
• WORKING FOR WATER

55
56

• MEDICAL SUPPORT FOR VETERANS WHO ARE UNDERGOING
  TRAINING AT CAT.

VETERANS PROJECTS (CONT)
56
57
LOCAL SPONSORS

• DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE (OPERATION VUSELELA)
• DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR (NSF-SASSETA PROJECT)
• DEPARTMENT OF LAND AFFAIRS
• DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS FORESTRY (OPERATION
  VUSELELA)
• DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
• DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

57
58
LOCAL SPONSORS (CONT)

• CURUMUS ASSOCIATION
• PW BOTHA BURSARY FUND FOR EX SADF SERVICEMEN AND
  THEIR DEPENDENTS
• NATIONAL RESEARCH FUND (UNISA RESEARCH FOR HET
  FOR VETERANS AND THEIR DEPENDENTS)

58
59
INTERNATIONAL SPONSORS

• FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
• REPUBLIC OF CHINA

59
60
SERVICE CORPS
61
TYPE OF TRAINING FOR EXITING MEMBERS

• Exiting members can apply for any SAQA compliant
  course at any institution closest to their place
  of residence, including courses for distance
  learning, facilitated by Service Corps Regional
  Offices nationally.

61
62
BUDGET FOR EXITING MEMBERSBY SERVICES/DIVISIONS

• AN ALLOCATION OF R13000.00 PER INDIVIDUAL IS
  BUDGETED FOR BY SERVICES AND DIVISIONS FOR THE
  PURPOSE OF RESKILLING ON EXIT OF A MEMBER ONLY
  FOR MEM (PACKAGES)

62
63
SERVICE CORPS ASSISTED PROJECTS FOR MILITARY
VETERANS
63
64
TRAINING PROVIDERS

• CURRENTLY 153 TRAINING PROVIDERS ARE UTILISED BY
  THE SERVICE CORPS
• DETAILS PROVIDED IN THE HANDOUT

64
65
TRAINING SKILLS AVAILABLE TO VETS

• RANGE OF 322 SKILLS OFFERED
• DETAILS PROVIDED IN THE HANDOUT
• TRAINING SKILLS AVAILABLE TO VETS

65
66
SERVICE CORPS BUDGET ALLOCATION VERSUS
EXPENDITURE Y2000 TO Y2006
66
67
SERVICE CORPS BUDGET ALLOCATION
Current Amount Figures indicated R000
Item 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
10 32,063 30,135 32,755 33,230 36,993 39,080 42,965 46,115 43,980
15 10,739 8,018 6,434 4,480 5,670 2,706 3,035
20 2,526 1,392 1,877 1,230 2,128 1,736 1,684
25 1,895 1,825 2,580 1,360 1,357 365 71
35 4,553 3,489 3,970 3,444 4,399 7,203 5,133
50/60 566 354 Amount 0 0 0 1,160 612
Total 52,342 44,859 47,616 43,743 50,613 52,322 55,429 57,727 (52,480)
11,613 8,500
Note 2007 Total Budget reduced from
allocated RM 57,7 to RM 52,4. Operating
Budget reduced from RM 11,6 to RM 8,5
67
68
SERVICE CORPS BUDGET ALLOCATION
Current Amount Figures indicated
R000Item10 Non-Discretionary // Operating
Funds
Item 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
10 (Pers) 32,063 30,135 32,755 33,230 36,993 39,080 42,965 43,980
61.3 67.2 69.0 76.0 73.1 74.7 77.5 80.7
Opera-ting 20,279 14,724 14,861 10,513 13,620 13,242 12,464 8,500
38.7 32.8 31.0 24.0 26.9 25.3 22.5 19.3
Total 52,342 44,859 47,616 43,743 50,613 52,322 55,429 52,480
68
69
SERVICE CORPS BUDGET PERSONNEL BUDGET VS
OPERATING BUDGET
69
70
SERVICE CORPS BUDGET PERSONNEL BUDGET VS
EXPENDITURE
Current Amount vs Payment (Figures indicated
R000)
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Current 52,342 44,859 47,616 43,743 50,613 52,322 55,429
Pay-ment 49,027 45,809 46,272 44,125 46,932 45,742 44,730
Diffe-rence 3,315 -950 1,344 -382 3,681 6,580 10,699
Used 93.7 102.1 97.2 100.8 92.7 87.4 80.7
Under/Over -6.3 2.1 -2.8 0.8 -7.3 -12.6 -19.3
Note 2007 utilisation available by April 2008
70
71
SERVICE CORPS BUDGET UTILISATION
71
72
72
73
QUESTIONS
73