Workshop EC SPC 20 September 2006

1
OPEN TECHNICAL FORUMISO TC 184/SC4 Meeting
Ibusuki, 2 July 2007 LIGHT-SC4 AND INDUSTRY
DATA READINESS
Presentation by Paul van Exel, Director
Stichting USPI USPI Association for the Oil,
Gas, Process PoOwer industry
2
AGENDA PROPOSED

• OBJECTIVE OF THE SESSION
• ROADMAP PROCESS INDUSTRY
• DATA READINESS ASSESSMENT
• CURRENT READINESS
• LOGICAL ORDER OF DEVELOPMENTS
• PALLET OF STANDARDS

3
OBJECTIVE OF THE SESSION

• To put in context what is SC4-Light, easy
  understanding, easy use
• Best tactics given current options

4
Targets 2007In the context of the Roadmap-
From development to implementation
5
Roadmap life cycle data

• Creation of roadmap by senior group of
  engineering staff USPI
• Reason need to know where process industry stood
  and who would do what.
• 7 workshops in 2001, enthusiasm grew
• Published in Feb 2002 i.a. paper brochure that
  was widely distributed.
• Has been received very well as management can
  understand it very quickly.

6
USPI Roadmap for life cycle data
Today Feb 2002, publication date roadmap
7
Scenario ModelINTERNAL KEY DECISIVE FACTORS
8
Scenario ModelEXTERNAL KEY DECISIVE FACTORS
9
USPI-NL / Cap Gemini have developed an assessment
module on plant lifecycle data management
capabilities

• The assessment is against the USPI-NL roadmap
• The plant lifecycle data management capabilities
  of organizations in the supply chain (equipment
  suppliers, EPC contractors, and plant owners )
  are assessed
• Internally, within the company
• Externally, between business partners
• The capabilities are assessed against relevant
  key dimensions
• People organization
• Plant lifecycle data
• ICT infrastructures
• Business processes
• Strategic alignment
• Assessments have been done successfully at
  Lyondell, AkerKvaerner, ABB Lummus, Honeywell,
  Technip-Coflexip, Siemens Power Generation

The assessment shows the strengths and weaknesses
of organizations on plant lifecycle data
management
10
(No Transcript)
11
Example readiness one individual company
successful in a faze
number of readiness faze
12
number of readiness faze
scores individual readiness companies
Average readiness industry
Variation of readiness over individual companies
13
readiness score
Key dimension
readiness score
Variation of internal readiness over industry
14
readiness score
Key dimension
readiness score
Variation of external readiness over industry
15
Position of industry in roadmap
ONE TO ONE E-HANDOVER
Phases of External Data Readiness
INTERCOMMUNITY EXCHANGE EMERGING
MATURING INTERCOMMUNITY EXCHANGE
Today
2-3 Year
5 Year
Time
EXTERNAL PROCESS INTEGRATION
Phases of Internal Data Readiness
INTERNAL PROCESS INTEGRATION
SUB PROCESS OPTIMIZATION
WORK PROCESS STANDARDIZATION
Today Feb 2002
16
Message from the past!
Today Feb 2002
17
INTERPRETATION OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS

• Roadmap quality
• logic still valid. Internal precedes external
• Time scale was too optimistic. 2-3- year point in
  reality 5-7 years
• Position industry
• Internal readiness industry
• Mid faze 2 ready to use reference dictionaries
  for terms and definitions
• Some early start faze 3 Examples Start creating
  templates, use of product models
• External readiness industry
• Mid to end faze 1 handover gradually reaching
  maturity
• Mid faze 2 Communities and alliances in
  abundance, need for inter community exchange
  emerges.

18
LOGICAL ORDER STANDARDS DEVELOPMENTS
ISO15926-4
ISO15926-7
eCl_at_ss
Gellish Table
eOTD
AEX
ISO13584- 501, 511
DIN NE100 (IEC 61987-10/11)
NWI TC10 SC10 WG11
Gradual development implementation over time
PRODUCT MODEL Complex
PRODUCT MODEL Simple
TAXONOMY
DEFINITIONS
Common definitions are the base to it all!
NAMES
19
Product specification of classes and properties
pyramid

• Priorities
• Plant Owners, EPCs, Equipment vendors have
  different requirements
• E.g. 1 5 50
• Doing one slice of the pyramid requires man
  months - years
• Doing whole pyramid will require 100 200
  man-years.
• Need a clever and pragmatic roadmap

Foundationclasses(concepts)
Definitions
Inheritance
Specialisation
Standards object classes
Product modelsfor objects
- Textbook objects (templates)- Open standards
objects ISO, IEC, ASME, DIN, BSI, API, etc.
Industry Standards object classes
- Uneto, Cimis, etc.
Proprietary standard classes
Company specific - Catalogue items, product
portfolio (suppliers) - Standard buying
descriptions (e.g. MESC) - Piping classes, etc.
20
PROPOSED ACCESS TO EASY STANDARDS

• FOCUS ON TERMS AND DEFINITIONS ISO15926-4
• ISO15926-4, eOTD, eCl_at_ss,
• Practical applications support this view!
• ORCHESTRATE SIMPLE DISCIPLINE MODELS
• Map out disciplines, standards groups and their
  simple product models
• Instrumentation NAMUR/PROLIST, NE100 (IEC
  61987-10/11), ISA SP20
• ISO13584-501, 511
• Example for compressor\data, ICAAMC, ISOTC118
  (GELLISH)
• Achieve common Units of measure, properties,
  discipline data.
• ACHIEVE CONSENSUS ABOUT PROPER INTEGRATION FRAME
• Use results of comparison survey USPI
• Compared so-far ISO15926-7, Gellish Table, NE100,
  PLIB
• Give attention to translation of customer
  requirements to system requirements and then data
  and documentation requirements.
• Give attention to web standards XML, OWL, ieee

21
THANK YOU DISCUSSION?
22
ORGANISATION COMPOSITION ROLES EC