Understanding the Personal Curriculum - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Understanding the Personal Curriculum

Description:

IDEA defines what is not a diploma and therefore defines what is a diploma. ... to clarify that a regular high school diploma does not include an alternative ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: Empl205
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Understanding the Personal Curriculum


1
Understanding the Personal Curriculum
  • Why it is not a Special Education Thing

2
Reaching and Teaching All Michigan Students
3
Reality Check
  • Internationally, the United States does not have
    the highest educational standards. However, we
    have the deepest commitment to equityessential
    to a schools success is absolute commitment to a
    rigorous and relevant curriculum for all
    students.
  • Bill Daggett

4
Practicalities
  • Preparing Michigan Students for Work and College
    Success are the same thing
  • Governors Goal - Double the number of college
    graduates in Michigan
  • Students success in college or the workplace is
    linked to high level courses in English, science
    and math beyond Algebra II
  • Rigorous requirements do not increase dropout
    rates

5
In the last 30 years, jobs have been
redistributed employment share and earnings
have shrunk for high school drop outs
  • Until the 1970s the United States economic
    dominance rested on a solid agricultural and
    manufacturing base where workers with high school
    or less could provide a comfortable living for
    their families
  • Today, ideas rather than natural resources
    comprise an increasing share in GDP growth

1973
Employment share Earnings
32 25,900
40 32,000
9 51,000
12 40,000
7 57,700
High school drop outs
High school graduates
Some college, no degree
Associate degree
Bachelors degree
Graduate degree
2001
Employment share Earnings
9 20,700
31 29,600
21 52,600
18 35,800
11 68,200
10 37,100
Source Autor, Levy, Murnane, 2003 Carnavale
(ETS), 2003
6
Schools DO Make a Difference
  • Research of
  • Larry Lazotte,
  • Wilbur Brookover
  • Michael Rutter
  • Conclude that
  • All children can learn
  • Schools control the factors that assure mastery
    of the curriculum

7
Schools DO Make a Difference
  • Robert Marzano, What Works in Schools, 2003
  • An analysis of research conducted over a 35 year
    period demonstrates that schools that are highly
    effective produce results that almost entirely
    overcome the effects of student backgrounds.

8
Getting to Credit
  • Credit must be aligned with subject area content
    expectations

9
Strategies to Assist Student Success
  • Integrated instruction
  • Online learning
  • College credit opportunities
  • Work based learning
  • Project based learning
  • Flexible scheduling
  • Spiraled Curriculum
  • Peer coaching
  • Adult mentoring
  • Electives

10
Options to Meet MMC Requirements
  • A PC is not necessarily needed for alternative
    instructional delivery methods and course work
    inclusive of MMC credit requirements for the
    following
  • Humanities sequence
  • Career and technical education
  • Industrial technology courses
  • Dual enrollment, International Baccalaureate, AP
    courses
  • Alternative education programs

11
Guiding Principles
  • The PC is one of many options to help students
    meet or exceed the MMC
  • The PC is the exception and agreed upon with
    thought and integrity
  • The PC is agreed upon and initiated by the
    parent/guardian or emancipated student
  • Educators are obligated to teach a challenging
    curriculum and prepare students for post
    secondary goals
  • The PC is an individualized plan for rigor and
    relevance based on the HSCE
  • The PC holds constant the graduation
    requirements, curriculum and content
  • The PC is consistent with SBE policy on Universal
    Education and Design for learning

12
Personal Curriculum
  • Legislative Requirements
  • Agreement between the superintendent,
    parent/guardian, and the student
  • Developed by a team that must include at least
  • student
  • parent/guardian
  • counselor/designee
  • school psychologist should be included for
    students with disabilities
  • Meets as much of MMC (HSCE/CCE) as practicable
  • Aligned with the EDP
  • Measurable goals
  • Method to evaluate progress
  • Communication of progress with parent

13
Educational Development Plans
  • The Board of a LEA or Board of Directors of a
    PSA
  • Shall ensure each pupil in Grade 7 is provided
    with the opportunity to develop an EDP
  • The EDP shall be developed before the student
    enters high school
  • Shall be developed by
  • Pupil
  • School counselor
  • School Psychologist should be included if the
    student has an IEP

14
Essential Elements for EDPs
  • 1.  Personal Information
  • 2.  Career Goal(s)
  • 3.  Educational/Training Goal(s)
  • 4.  Assessment Results
  • 5.  Plan of Action
  • 6.  Parent Consultation/Endorsement
  • (under age 18)

Courtesy of Christine Reiff, Office of Career
and Technical Preparation
15
Drop Out Prevention
  • If a pupil is not successfully completing a
    credit required for graduation or is identified
    as being at risk of withdrawing from HS
  • The pupil's school district or PSA shall notify
    the pupils parents/guardian of the availability
    of
  • tutoring or
  • other supplemental educational supports and
    counseling services

16
Mathematics Modification
17
Modifications
  • Health and Physical Education and Visual,
    Performing and Applied Arts
  • Student takes additional credit beyond the
    required credits in English Language Arts, Math,
    Science, or World Languages
  • Health education and social skills programs
    improve school and test performance, attendance
    and school connectedness
  • Physical education, structured physical activity
    and higher fitness levels impact student
    achievement.

18
Modifications
  • Social Studies
  • The third credit may be modified if the student
    takes an additional credit (beyond the required
    credits) in English Language Arts, Math, Science,
    or World Language
  • 2 credits required, including civics

19
Transfer Students
  • Student has successfully completed the
    equivalent of 2 years of high school credit out
    of state or at a nonpublic school.
  • Districts may use appropriate assessment
    examinations to determine what credits were
    earned out of state or at a nonpublic school
  • The Personal Curriculum incorporates as much of
    the subject area content expectations of the
    Michigan merit standard as is practicable.
  • Student successfully completes at least 1
    mathematics credit during final year of high
    school.
  • Credit must be at least Algebra 1 if enrolled at
    least 1 year
  • Next credit above Algebra 1 if student has
    demonstrated success in Algebra1
  • Student must take Civics

20
Modifications
  • No modifications in the following areas
  • English Language Arts
  • Science
  • World Languages
  • Civics
  • Online Learning Experience
  • Exception Students with a disability and
    transfer students

21
Subsection (k)
  • Permits consideration of modifications not
    otherwise allowed
  • PC allows some credit swapping and some content
    modification
  • Modification is subject to demonstration that
    the modification is necessary because the pupil
    is a child with a disability
  • Permits the modification to be made to the
    extent necessary

22
Subsection (k) cont.
  • The modification must be consistent with the
    Educational Development Plan and the
    Individualized Education Program
  • This determination is made by at least
  • student
  • parent/guardian
  • counselor/designee
  • school psychologist should be included for
    students with disabilities

23
Link to IDEA
  • If a pupil receives special education services,
    the pupil's IEP shall identify
  • the appropriate course or courses of study and
  • the supports, accommodations, and modifications
    necessary to allow the pupil to progress in the
    curricular requirements of the MMC or PC and meet
    the requirements for a diploma.

24
Accountability
  • NCLB and IDEA 04 hold State and Public Agencies
    accountable for the performance of students with
    disabilities within a structure of state
    standards.
  • While it is allowable to account for growth and
    performance for some of these students on
    alternative achievement standards it is not
    appropriate to create a different path to
    graduation.

25
Accountability
  • IDEA defines what is not a diploma and therefore
    defines what is a diploma.
  • Section 300.102(a)(3), regarding exceptions to
    FAPE, has been changed to clarify that a regular
    high school diploma does not include an
    alternative degree that is not fully aligned with
    the States academic standards, such as a
    certificate or a general educational development
    credential (GED).
  • In this context, nothing from the MDE can counter
    the accountability framework that NCLB and IDEA
    create.

26
Some Things Seems to Be Very Clear
  • We cannot substitute alternative content and
    count achievement within that content towards the
    18 credit requirements.
  • We cannot reduce the number of credits.
  • The IEP supports but does not trump the
    graduation requirements.
  • There are no plans for a Special Education
    curriculum that will lead to a separate diploma.
  • No such thing as a modified diploma.
  • Kids who dont get a diploma are not doomed to
    fail in life.
  • Districts can issue alternative certificates but
    they do not end FAPE.

27
So where do we get answers?
  • There are two sets of guidance documents posted
    to the Office of School Improvement website.
  • Follow this link
  • http//www.michigan.gov/mde/0,1607,7-140-6530_3033
    4-178576--,00.html

28
Or.
  • Start with the MDE website
  • MDE - Michigan Department of Education
  • http//www.michigan.gov/mde
  • Go to the OFFICES tab on the left side of the
    page
  • Follow the School Improvement link
  • Follow the Personal Curriculum Guidelines link

29
And now
  • Answers to your questions

30
SEAC Questions on Personal Curriculum
  • Generated on January 9th 2008 in preparation for
    Personal Curriculum presentation to SEAC on
    February 6th, 2008
  • The latest versions of MDEs Personal Curriculum
    Guidelines and examples documents can be found
    here
  • http//www.michigan.gov/mde/0,1607,7-140-6530_3033
    4-178576--,00.html

31
Umbrella Question
  • Q When and under what circumstances should a PC
    be considered for a student? When is it not
    necessary?
  • A Page 39, Questions 1 and 2 of the FAQ section
    in the Supporting Materials and Examples

32
Additional Questions
  • Q What is the schools obligation to bring up
    the option of a PC at an EDT or IEP?
  • A The school would be responsible for informing
    the parent of the personal curriculum as part of
    their general information sharing process
    regarding the graduation requirements.

33
  • Q What is the role of the IEP with regards to
    MME?
  • A Identifies which version of the exam the
    student will be assessed on and any modifications
    or accommodations that are necessary and
    permissible.

34
  • Q How does the IEP/504 plan interface with the
    end of credit exams?
  • A Identify accommodations and modifications

35
  • Q Are there other ways besides to PC within the
    HS curriculum for students with IEPs to
    demonstrate the competencies required by MMC?
  • A The PC has nothing to do with demonstrating
    competence.

36
  • Q Is the PC framed around the students
    interests and capabilities/competencies?
  • A The PC is a tool for making changes to the
    graduation requirements as identified in 1278a
    and 1278b. It individualizes the rigor of the
    students course of study as identified in the
    EDP. A good EDP should be based on sources of
    information that identify preferences, strengths
    and interests of students and families.

37
  • Q How will the state (MDE) monitor the rate of
    students with PCs?
  • A Through the SRSD - SDS

38
  • Q What plans are there to develop a
    user-friendly guide to PC for parents and school
    staff? (user-friendly meaning lt5 pages, not in .4
    font, as jargon-less as possible etc.)
  • A We are forming a group to do this as we speak.

39
  • Q What provisions are there to balance more
    rigor in one area with less rigor somewhere else?
  • A There are no official provisions. This is a
    decision that must be made and agreed to by the
    development team.

40
  • Q How will consistency between districts (LEAs)
    be assured if LEAs each define their own end of
    credit exams?
  • Q How will we deal with the issue of equity
    between district to district, and between program
    to program?
  • A Data portraits. We must connect the dots
    between course of study, performance on the MME,
    graduation and postsecondary outcomes.

41
  • Q What ISDs are coordinating efforts with their
    local districts with regard to MME? How are they
    doing that?
  • A Thats a good question!

42
Contact Information
  • Personal Curriculum
  • Deborah Clemmons Clemmonsd_at_michgian.gov
  • Supervisor for Curriculum and Literacy
  • 517-241-2479 MDE OSI
  • Special Education
  • Matt Korolden koroldenm_at_michigan.gov
  • Co-director, Secondary Redesign and Transition
  • 517-241-3509 MDE OSE/EI
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com