Carnegie Mellon University DYNAMiX Technologies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Carnegie Mellon University DYNAMiX Technologies

Description:

'The nation of Akbarstan may be developing nuclear weapons' ... 'Akbarstan may be developing chemical rather than nuclear weapons' Innovative claims ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: santoshan
Learn more at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Carnegie Mellon University DYNAMiX Technologies


1
Carnegie Mellon UniversityDYNAMiX Technologies
RAPIDRepresentation and Analysis
ofProbabilistic Intelligence Data
  • July 19, 2007
  • Kick-off Meeting

2
People
Carnegie Mellon University Prof. Jaime
Carbonell Dr. Eugene Fink Dr. Chun Jin Two
graduate students
DYNAMiX Technologies Dr. Ganesh Mani Mr. Dwight
Dietrich Development team
3
Motivation
  • We are developing tools for the analysis of
    dynamically evolving intelligence, which may
    include uncertain and partially missing data.
  • These tools will help analysts to draw
    conclusions based on available intelligence,
    identify critical uncertainties, and develop
    strategies for proactive collection of additional
    intelligence.

4
Puzzle-solving analogy
Which missing parts are most helpful and when?
Available knowledge
Observable facts
Hiddenfacts
Initial knowledge
  • Knowledge sources
  • Public domain
  • Intelligence data collection
  • Inferences and conclusions

5
Example
  • Assessment of the potential WMDcapabilities of
    hostile countries.
  • Identify a potential threat based on available
    intelligenceThe nation of Akbarstan may be
    developing nuclear weapons
  • Formulate the related specific hypothesesAkbarst
    ani may be secretly acquiring fissionable
    materials andbuilding an underground nuclear
    facility to the north of their capital
  • If the available intelligence is insufficient for
    validating or refuting these hypotheses, collect
    additional intelligenceUse UAVs to track the
    deliveries to the suspected nuclear facility
  • Re-evaluate the threat based on new
    intelligenceAkbarstan may be developing
    chemical rather than nuclear weapons

6
Example
  • Assessment of the potential WMDcapabilities of
    hostile countries.
  • Identify a potential threat based on available
    intelligence
  • Formulate the related specific hypotheses
  • If the available intelligence is insufficient for
    validating or refuting these hypotheses, collect
    additional intelligence
  • Re-evaluate the threat based on new
    intelligenceAkbarstan may be developing
    chemical rather than nuclear weapons

7
Innovative claims
  • Suite of intelligent tools for identification of
    hidden patterns in uncertain intelligence data
  • Automated analysis of critical uncertainties and
    development of intelligence-collection plans
  • Collaboration between human analysts and
    automated data-processing engines

8
Previous work ARGUS
  • ARGUS project sponsored by DTO/ARDA
    Identification and tracking of novel patterns in
    massive databases and data streams.

Create
Detect
Create
Detect
Novel
Novel
Historical
Background
Novel
Historical
Background
Novel
Background
Novel
Re
-
cluster
Background
Novel
Re
-
cluster
Clusters
Clusters
Data
Model
Events
Data
Model
Events
Analyst
Model
Events
Model
Events
Tracked
New
Events
Data
Generate
Generate
Update
New
New
Match
Match
Profiles
Alerts
Profiles
Alerts
Profiles
Profiles
Profiles
Profiles
Profiles
Analyst

9
ARGUS novelty detection
  • Estimate density function at t0
  • Grow the cluster for a period of ?t while
    reducing the weight of old records
  • Estimate the new density function at t0?t
  • Compare the two estimates

10
ARGUS novelty detection
Respiratory Diseases
SARS
Re-clustering
t0
?t
11
Previous work RADAR
  • RADAR project sponsored by DARPAAnalysis and
    management of volatile crisis situations based on
    uncertain data.

Top-level control and learning
Processnew data
Analyst
12
Previous work RADAR
We have applied the system to repair a schedule
of a conference after a crisis loss of rooms.
13
Proposed RAPID functionality
  • Representation of uncertainty
  • Inferences from uncertain data
  • Analysis of critical uncertainties
  • Predictive Markov models
  • Graphical user interface
  • Unlike ARGUS
  • Represents and analyzes uncertainty
  • Supports complex inferences
  • Analyzes possible adversarial actions
  • Unlike RADAR
  • Scales to massive intelligence datasets
  • Analyzes complex external situations
  • Develops intelligence-collection plans

14
Proposed functionality
Learning of new knowledge
Knowledge editing
Knowledge base
Fast matchingand retrieval
Inferencerules
Markov models
Uncertain situationassessment
Real-time responses
New intelligence
Massive databases
Analyst
Intelligent tools for data analysis
Contingency analysis
Adversarialsearch
Explanationof inferences
Identification ofcritical uncertainties
15
Representation of uncertain intelligence data
  • Uncertain nominals, numbers, strings, spatial
    data, graph topologies, and functions
  • Indexing of massive uncertain data, and fast
    retrieval of exact and approximate matches

Possible values
16
Inferences from uncertain intelligence data
  • Representation of dependencies among data by
    inference rules
  • Fast propagation of inferences through
    large-scale networks of dependencies

17
Proactive collection of intelligence data
  • Automated identification of critical
    uncertainties
  • Planning of proactive intelligence collection
  • Contingency analysis of alternative scenarios

Filtering and processing of new intelligence
Propagation of inferences
Analysisof key indicators
Development of an intelligence collection plan
New intelligence
18
Predictive Markov models
  • Hypothesis validation and identification of key
    indicators
  • Automated improvement ofmodel topologies

X2
X1
Obser-vations
WMD facilities
Qualified personnel
Available material
Z12
Z11
Hiddenreality
Development Goal
Develop-ment goal
Z22
Z21
Material acquisition
Facility construction
Personnelhiring
Y2
Y1
New obser-vations
Present
Past
19
Graphical user interface
  • Integrated access to all proposed tools
  • Visualization and explanation of proactive
    intelligence-collection strategies

20
Test data
  • Phase 1 (July 2007 Dec 2008)
  • Patient data from MS Health Data Consortium1.6
    million records, 70 attributes
  • Network event database from CyDAT Center10
    billion records
  • Phases 24 (Jan 2008 Dec 2011)
  • Challenge problems provided by PAINT/DTO

Related question Can we get any
preliminaryinformation about the types of target
data?
21
Project plan
Task From To
Representation of uncertainty July 2007 June 2008
Inferences from uncertain data July 2007 Dec 2008
Analysis of uncertainties Jan 2009 Dec 2010
Predictive Markov models July 2007 Dec 2009
Graphical user interface Jan 2008 Dec 2010
System integration Jan 2008 Dec 2011
22
First year
  • Representation (July Dec 2007)
  • Uncertain data and inferences
  • Task hierarchies and utilities
  • Markov model input
  • Basic operations (Jan June 2008)
  • Indexing of uncertain data
  • Propagation of inferences
  • Predictive Markov modeling
  • Initial GUI design (Jan June 2008)

23
Collaborations
We plan to explore collaborations withother
participants of the PAINT program.
  • New Vectors and Set CorporationIntegration of
    multiple predictive models
  • Fair IsaacAnalysis of unstructured intelligence
    data
  • Least Squares

We will also explore collaborations with
companies that may be interested to convert RAPID
into a commercial product.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com