Determinants of Trust and Credibility of Industry, Government, and Citizen Groups in Japan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Determinants of Trust and Credibility of Industry, Government, and Citizen Groups in Japan

Description:

Determinants of trust and credibility in regard to environmental risk ... Comparative study with Peters, Covello, and McCallum (1997) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: kasumiSys
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Determinants of Trust and Credibility of Industry, Government, and Citizen Groups in Japan


1
Determinants of Trust and Credibility of
Industry, Government, and Citizen Groups in Japan
  • Yasunobu MAEDA and Makoto MIYAHARA
  • Department of Systems Engineering,
  • Shizuoka University, Japan
  • SRA Annual Meeting 2000

2
Introduction
  • Determinants of trust and credibility in regard
    to environmental risk communication of industry,
    government, and citizen groups in Japan were
    investigated.
  • Comparative study with Peters, Covello, and
    McCallum (1997).
  • Six hypotheses proposed by Peters et al. were
    tested in Japan.

3
Hypothesis
  1. Trust and credibility are dependent on knowledge
    and expertise, openness and honesty, and concern
    and care.
  2. Commitment is a display of concern.
  3. Disclosure of risk management is related to trust
    and credibility of industry and government.
  1. Trust and credibility is related to the amount of
    information received.
  2. Peoples concern with risks is positively related
    to trust of citizen groups, and negatively
    related to trust of industry and government.
  3. People who recently received risk information
    have lower trust of industry and government, and
    higher trust of citizen groups.

4
Method
  • A questionnaire translated in Japanese from the
    form made by Peters et al. was used. Factors
    related to trust and credibility and hypothesized
    determinants were measured by using 4-point
    Likert-type scaling and nominal scaling.
  • The questionnaire was sent out to 5 communities
    in which communication about environmental risks
    was needed. Number of respondents are 500 in
    total, 100 from each community.
  • Multiple regression analysis for Hypothesis 1,
    Analysis of variance for the other hypotheses.

5
Result (1)
  • Table 1 Summary of the Hypothesis tests (N151)

The U.S. Japan
Hypothesis IND GOV C.G. IND GOV C.G.
1 (3 factors)
2 (Commitment)
3 (Disclosure) -
4 (Amount of info.) - -
5 (Peoples concern) - -
6 (Temporal effect) - - - -
supported, partially supported, - not
supported
6
Result (2) Comments from the respondents
  • Reasons to trust
  • Environmental countermeasures were carried out.
    (industry)
  • Investigation and inspection were carried out.
    (industry and government)
  • They act for the community and residents.
    (citizen groups)
  • They act on the resident's standpoint. (citizen
    groups)
  • Reasons not to trust
  • Their information has less credibility.
    (industry and government)
  • Their consciousness of and countermeasures for
    harmful chemical materials are insufficient.
    (industry)
  • Their countermeasures are late and inadequate.
    (government)
  • They are not well established, and their
    existence is hardly noticed. (citizen groups)
  • They are emotional. (citizen groups)

7
Summary of the Results
  • Perceptions of concern and care have an effect on
    perceptions of trust and credibility in the both
    countries.
  • Strong correlation between perceptions of concern
    and care and perceptions of commitment is
    confirmed.
  • However, it is suggested that disclosure of
    information is not related to trust and
    credibility in Japan.
  • A determinant of trust and credibility may be
    related to social ranking of industry,
    government, and citizen groups.

8
Why disclosure of information does not work as a
determinant?
  • Cf Factors to promote pro-environmental behavior
    of Japanese people

In Japan, whether or not a Japanese had
environmental information is not strongly related
to his/her behavior (Aoyagi 1998, Ohe 1999).
9
Why disclosure of information does not work as a
determinant? (continued)
  • Aoyagi (1998) Social efficacy
  • If a Japanese feels his/her action is effective
    for conserving the environment, then he/she will
    take pro-environmental actions, otherwise he/she
    will not.
  • Trust and credibility of a group may be depend on
    if the group is ready to respond to questions and
    comment from citizens.
  • One-way disclosure of information is not
    sufficient.

10
Conclusions
  • Perceptions of commitment have an effect on
    perceptions of trust and credibility of industry
    and citizen groups perceptions of concern and
    care affect perceptions of trust and credibility
    of government.
  • The hypotheses in regard to disclosure of
    information were not supported in Japan.
  • It is suggested that there are other determinants
    of trust and credibility in the Japanese society.
  • To investigate the other determinants, another
    survey is currently in progress.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com