Enterprise QoS Reality Check - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Enterprise QoS Reality Check

Description:

Avoid becoming a victim of QoS myths... QoS is a labelling and feedback problem, not a signalling and admission control problem ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:13
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: NDC
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Enterprise QoS Reality Check


1
Enterprise QoS Reality Check
  • Terry Gray
  • Director, Networks Distributed Computing
  • University of Washington

2
Context
  • UW network
  • 45,000 machines
  • 500 GB/day
  • 50 remote locations
  • ATM-free zone
  • Experts in breaking networks

3
Network Manager Goals
  • Meet client expectations by matching capacity
    with demand via
  • increasing capacity
  • optimizing use of available capacity
  • reducing demand
  • Avoid becoming a victim of QoS myths...
  • Re Admission Control, Reservations, and
    Bandwidth Guarantees

4
Admission Control
  • Does not create capacity
  • How many fast-busy signals success?
  • Makes sense IFF
  • BW cost gt BW Management cost
  • Denial (busy signals) better than degradation
  • Cost model precludes adding capacity
  • A tactical solution to a strategic problem
  • namely, matching capacity with demand.

5
Reservations
  • Require sequestered bandwidth
  • Require end-times
  • Are useless for small chunk allocations
  • Are generally not beloved by users
  • Require manual coordination for large chunk
    allocations

6
Bandwidth Guarantees
  • In a shared medium, there are no guarantees, only
    probabilities
  • P(denial) or P(degradation)
  • No free lunch
  • If you dont invest in capacity, you will need to
    invest in more technology, but also people to
    develop and manage bandwidth policies

7
Bandwidth Management
  • Different strategies needed for different
    congestion zones and timescales...
  • Congestion zones
  • Subnet
  • Backbone
  • WAN
  • Timescales
  • Per packet (Traffic Shaping, DiffServ)
  • Per flow or session (Admission Control)
  • Persistent (MPLS, DWDM)

8
Three Kinds of Traffic
  • Preferred (usually Interactive)
  • Best Effort
  • Sacrificial

9
Provisioning
  • Claim
  • You must adequately provision for Preferred and
    Best-Effort traffic, or you will die at the hands
    of the few or the many
  • Conclusion
  • QoS is a labelling and feedback problem, not a
    signalling and admission control problem

10
Feedback Alternatives
  • Admission controls (fast-busy signals)
  • explicit short term feedback
  • doesn't solve real problem.
  • Usage pricing
  • implicit long term feedback
  • revenue stream for adding capacity
  • Social pressure
  • e.g. top user lists

11
One Approach
  • Combo of provisioning simple diffserv
  • Try laissez faire tagging by end-system
  • Premium-port strategy if that fails
  • Encourage resilient application design

12
QoS Worries
  • Increasing network complexity
  • Impact on network reliability
  • Effects of Policy Jitter
  • Beware the prophets of DEN
  • WAN QoS accounting
  • Building upgrades (cat 3 wireplant)
  • Wireless

13
For more info
  • http//staff.washington.edu/gray/papers
  • gray_at_washington.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com