Title: NEW PARTNERSHIP FOR AFRICAN RED CROSS
1NEW PARTNERSHIP FOR AFRICAN RED CROSS RED
CRESCENT SOCIETIES NOUVEAU PARTENARIAT DES
SOCIÉTÉS AFRICAINES DE LA CROIX ROUGE ET DU
CROISSANT ROUGE
Distr. General
Doc. No. NEPARC/GA/07/03 1 August
2007 Original English
NEPARC GENERAL ASSEMBLY 3rd General Assembly
Meeting 2007 Novotel, Abidjan, Côte dIvoire
August 10-11, 2007
2006 SGS NGO BENCHMARKING AUDIT Uganda Red
Cross Society Experience
August 2007
2Objectives of the SGS Audit
- To assess the extent to which the URCS policies,
procedures conform to the best management
Practices outlined in the NGO Benchmarking
Standard. - To quantify URCS performance against the best
management practices. - To provide URCS with Specific recommendations
towards continuous improvement.
3Some findings as per 2nd Audit
- URCS has solid strengths under the dimensions of
Operations and Outcomes with scores of 100 - Because of having a good Strategic Plan
- Monitoring Mechanism
- Standard Operating Procedures
- Stakeholders were identified and participated in
URCS programmes basing on projects - Established procurement procedure, leading to a
transparent, competitive and orderly procurement
process. - Good housekeeping.
4Reasons for a big leap in Scores
- Pro-activeness of the Senior leadership
- With zeal for continuous improvement.
- Commitment to compliance with best practices.
- Succession planned recruitment enabling for
institutional memory. - Adequate internal professional support.
- High desire for compliance with best practices
consolidated into the NGO BA
5Tangible improvements from SGS1 SGS2
- Approved Fraud policy in place operational
- Approved Conflict of interest policy
- Seeing gaps as opportunities for improvement
- Areas of weaknesses are owned and steps taken to
address them are involving.
6Tangible improvements ...
- Comprehensive code of conduct policy addressing
- Board management relations
- Bribery
- Corruption
- Theft Misuse of property
- protection of whistle blowers
- Nepotism
- Sexual harassment
- Conduct of dis repute
- Any form of violence e.t.c
7Tangible improvements
- A fundraising policy in place.
- Developed policies are shared.
- Considerable improvement in the score for
Continuous Improvement Previous year 75.0 and
now Score of 95.8 - More keen interest in unintended outcomes of
Program interventions.
8Tangible improvements
- Revised Constitution with SGS inputs.
- Revised and improved election guidelines
- Now have a communication policy
- Developed staff competence profiles
- Have in place staff development plan
9Tangible improvements
- URCS has continued to monitor its various aspects
of operations for continuous improvement. - URCS has found it very important to implement all
other aspects as observed not only for audit
purposes but also to improve its own systems.
10Have we reached yet? The Last S!(Surveillance)
shows a large room for improvement.
- Document Procedures to identify and prevent
any stakeholders from having a significant
influence over the organization. - Have documented procedures to involve
stakeholders in determination of project
goals and outputs. - Carry out impact assessment for projects prior to
implementation of projects. - Check compliance against occupational health and
safety standards.
11More room to improve
- Policy of phasing out programs/projects.
- Policy on register of trustees interests
- More neutral evaluation of board gt Self
assessment - Rotation of board on Batch basis
- Volunteers signing the code.
12Lessons Learnt
- Commitment and leadership is the key
- Improvement is the largest room
- Own up recommendations
- Consider gaps as an opportunity
- There can be overall change in score without
change in a given critical area. - It is better to have benchmarks than just work
hard for measuring and celebrating success, or - Step by step approach is better, so take a step
into SGS.