MSHA Rule Making Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

MSHA Rule Making Process

Description:

That is, MSHA will publish a DFR and state, if there is a significant adverse ... It is good for 9 months and MSHA can enforce the ETS for 9 months only. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: smith190
Learn more at: http://www.naalc.org
Category:
Tags: msha | making | msha | process | rule

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MSHA Rule Making Process


1
MSHA Rule Making Process
  • Terry L. Bentley
  • Acting Deputy Administrator
  • Coal Mine Safety and Health

2
The Statute
  • The Federal Mine Act --
  • Adopts Administrative Procedure Act
  • Provides for public input
  • Allows for emergency rulemaking
  • Prohibits reducing protection
  • Allows 60 days to challenge rules

3
The Regulatory Process
  • Proposed Rule
  • Final Rule
  • Rule Making Process Details

4
The Regulatory Process -- The Proposed Rule
  • Establish a rulemaking committee
  • Draft
  • proposed rule
  • preamble
  • economic analysis
  • Obtain clearances and publish proposed rule
  • Hold hearings request public comments

5
The Regulatory Process --The Final Rule
  • Review all pre- and post hearing comments and
    hearing testimony
  • Draft
  • final rule
  • preamble
  • economic analysis
  • Obtain clearances and publish final rule

6
Rule Making ProcessDetails
  • 1. In promulgating a rule, MSHA issues a proposed
    rule, followed by hearings and public comment,
    and then a final rule.  Time frames are normally
    4-6 months to draft a proposed rule, 3-4 months
    for clearance through MSHA and other agencies,
    2-3 months for public hearings and comments, and
    repeat of drafting and clearance times for final
    rule. 

7
Rule Making ProcessDetails
  • 2. To speed up the process (which can easily take
    2 years or longer), where no controversy is
    expected MSHA has issued a Direct Final Rule
    (DFR).  That is, MSHA will publish a DFR and
    state, if there is a significant adverse comment,
    MSHA will go back and follow the normal
    procedures for rule making.
  • Where there is no such comment, the DFR becomes
    effective as a final rule.  MSHA has some success
    with this approach.  By eliminating the proposed
    rule stage, total time to promulgation can be
    reduced by 50.

8
Rule Making ProcessDetails
  • 3.  Where there is a need to narrow issues or
    identify issues or potential problem areas, MSHA
    has issued Requests for Information (RFI).  This
    is an extra step that allows us to frame a more
    appropriate proposed rule. 
  • 4.  For particularly sensitive issues, MSHA has
    sought public input through public information
    gathering meetings.

9
Rule Making ProcessDetails
  • 5.  Where there is a grave danger and a necessity
    to act to protect miners, MSHA has authority to
    issue an emergency temporary standard, or ETS,
    which operates as both a final rule and a
    proposed rule.  The ETS is effective immediately
    upon publication without the need for public
    comment.  It is good for 9 months and MSHA can
    enforce the ETS for 9 months only.  At that
    point, MSHA must have a final rule in place (the
    ETS is also a proposed rule).  The ETS authority
    comes from the Federal Mine Act and is not
    applicable to other U.S. Government agencies.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com