Economics 100B Microeconomics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Economics 100B Microeconomics

Description:

promise to play the cooperative strategy as long as the other player does, ... Players in infinitely repeated games may be able to adopt subgame-perfect Nash ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: easternill8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Economics 100B Microeconomics


1
Economics 100BMicroeconomics
2
Announcements
  • Solution to Problem Set 5 has been posted on the
    course website

3
Course Outline
4
Todays Plan (Chapter 15)
  • Repeated Games
  • Incomplete Information Games

5
D. Repeated Games
  • Repeated games expand the strategy sets available
    to the players
  • Can reward and punish

6
Ex Prisoners Dilemma
  • One-time play
  • the Nash equilibrium would be the expected outcome

Player B
Player A
7
Ex Prisoners Dilemma
  • Repeated play for T periods
  • the only subgame perfect equilibrium is the Nash
    equilibrium outcome in every round

Player B
Player A
8
Ex Prisoners Dilemma
  • Infinite repetitions
  • each player can announce a trigger strategy
  • promise to play the cooperative strategy as long
    as the other player does, otherwise revert to the
    competitive strategy
  • the twin trigger strategy is a subgame perfect
    equilibrium if the promise of cooperative play is
    credible

9
Ex Prisoners Dilemma
  • Infinite repetitions
  • Assume A plays a trigger strategy
  • The present value of continued cooperation is
  • 2 ?2 ?22 22 ? /(1-?)
  • The payoff from cheating is
  • 3 ?1 ?21 3 ?/(1-?)
  • Continued cooperation will be credible if
  • 22 ? /(1-?) gt 3 ?/(1-?) ? gt ½

10
Tacit Collusion
  • Players in infinitely repeated games may be able
    to adopt subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium
    strategies that yield better outcomes than simply
    repeating a less favorable Nash equilibrium
    indefinitely

11
Tacit Collusion
  • With any finite number of replications, the
    Bertrand result will remain unchanged
  • If the pricing game is repeated over infinitely
    many periods, twin trigger strategies become
    feasible
  • each firm sets its price equal to the monopoly
    price (PM) providing the other firm did the same
    in the prior period

12
Tacit Collusion
  • Suppose that firm B is considering cheating
  • by choosing PB lt PA PM it can obtain almost all
    of the single period monopoly profits (?M)
  • by continuing to collude tacitly with A, it will
    earn its share of the profit stream
  • (?M ???M ?2?M ?n?M )/2
  • (?M /2)1/(1-??)

13
Tacit Collusion
  • Cheating will be unprofitable if
  • ?M lt (?M /2)1/(1- ?)
  • or if
  • ? gt 1/2

14
Ex Steel Producers
  • Suppose only two firms produce steel bars for
    jailhouse windows
  • constant AC and MC of 10
  • the demand for bars is
  • Q 5,000 - 100P

15
Ex Steel Producers
  • Bertrand competition
  • each firm charges a price of 10 and 4,000 bars
    are sold
  • Cartel
  • the monopoly price is 30 quantity is 2,000
  • Combined profits are 40,000 each period
  • Any one firm gains from price cut if
  • 40,000 gt 20,000 (1/1-?)

16
Tacit Collusion
  • More general models of tacit collusion allow for
  • difficulty in monitoring other firms behavior
  • other forms of punishment

17
E. Incomplete Information Games
  • Players do not know their opponents payoff
    functions with certainty
  • equilibrium concepts involve straightforward
    generalizations of Nash and subgame-perfect
    notions

18
Basics
  • Each player may be one of a number of possible
    types (tA and tB) with differing payoff functions
  • Each players conjectures about the opponents
    type are represented by belief functions fA(tB)

19
Bayesian Equilibrium
  • A strategy pair (a,b) will be a Bayesian-Nash
    equilibrium if a maximizes As expected utility
    when B plays b and vice versa

20
Bayesian-Cournot Example
  • Inverse demand is P 100 q1 q2
  • MC1 10
  • MC2 may be low MC24 or high MC216
  • Suppose that firm 1 assigns equal probabilities
    0.5 to these two types for firm 2

21
Bayesian-Cournot Example
  • Firm 2 chooses q2 to maximize
  • ?2 (P MC2)q2
  • (100 MC2 q1 q2)q2
  • The first-order condition for a maximum is
  • q2 (100 MC2 q1)/2
  • q2H (84 q1)/2
  • q2L (96 q1)/2

22
Bayesian-Cournot Example
  • Firm 1s expected profit is
  • ?1 ½(100 MC1 q1 q2H)(q1)
  • ½ (100 MC1 q1 q2L)(q1)
  • ?1 (90 q1 ½ q2H ½ q2L)(q1)
  • The first-order condition for a maximum is
  • q1 (90 ½ q2H ½ q2L)/2

23
Bayesian-Cournot Example
  • The Bayesian-Nash equilibrium is
  • q1 30
  • q2H 27
  • q2L 33

24
Assignment
  • Finish reading Nicholson Chapter 15
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com