The trials and tribulations of an - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

The trials and tribulations of an

Description:

... by a judicious combination of involvement and estrangement' (Hammersley 1993:219) ... Possibility of enhanced rapport and communication ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: ls90
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The trials and tribulations of an


1
The trials and tribulations of an insider
researcher
  • Helen Stanley
  • EdD student
  • Head of Continuing Professional Education
  • School of Nursing and Midwifery

2
Aims of presentation
  • Highlight the trials and tribulations of the
    insider-outsider researcher dilemma
  • Present some reflections on my experience
    undertaking commissioned research as part of a
    EdD study
  • Stimulate some debate on how novice researchers
    can develop their understanding of reflexivity by
    exploring this position in their own studies

3
Context
  • Head of CPE with remit to ensure NHS trusts spend
    all their contract funding
  • New role for School in Educational Consultancy
  • Commissioned by two Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) to
    undertake a Learning Needs Analysis (LNA) survey
  • Focus was on leadership and management needs of
    senior NHS managers across both trusts
  • EdD needed a focus for project assignment

4
Definition of my role
  • Insider research can take many forms
  • A) Joint industry/Academic Research or
  • B). Organisational Insider Research (Holian and
    Brooks 2004)
  • This study was a Project where organisation
    (PCTs) have invited an academic as a consultant,
    with a formal contract specifying the role, task,
    outcomes and costs
  • Reduced cost as part of EdD study

5
Methodology
  • Qualitative, interpretative approach
  • Action Research and case study
  • Mixed methods
  • Focus Groups (FG) then LNA questionnaire
  • Codes from FG informed questionnaire
  • Documentary analysis used alongside FG and LNA
    questionnaire

6
Ethical issues
  • Who owns the data, who can release it for
    research purposes requested? (Cheek )
  • The relationship between the participants and the
    researcher
  • The nature and level of informed consent
  • The nature and extent of anonymity and
    confidentiality for individuals and the
    organisation (Holian and Brooks 2004 7)

7
Findings- Wish list
  • Formal courses
  • Informal learning

8
Obstacles
  • Role of KSF/appraisal/PDP
  • Organisational development
  • Financial pressures
  • Accessing study leave and negotiating the Study
    Leave Policy

9
Hidden surprises
  • Culture of the organisation
  • Lack of evaluation of education and training
  • Real reason for study was damming Investors in
    People report on poor capabilities of current
    managers

10
Insider-outsider continuum
  • Each position has advantages and disadvantages,
    depending on the circumstances and purposes of
    the research
  • In general, the chances of findings being valid
    can be enhanced by a judicious combination of
    involvement and estrangement (Hammersley
    1993219)

11
Insider advantages/disadvantages
  • Researching in familiar settings
  • Relative lack of culture shock or disorientation
  • Possibility of enhanced rapport and communication
  • Ability to gauge the honesty and accuracy of
    responses
  • Participants more likely to reveal more intimate
    details of their lives to someone considered
    empathetic
  • May be greater expectations of an insider than of
    a stranger
  • Relativity of insider status need to be aware
    of the partialness of their insider knowledge
  • Be wary of assuming their views are more
    widespread or representative than is the case
  • Strategies -risk of native going stranger
    (Hockey 1993)

12
Was I an insider?
  • Previous relationship with some of the trust
    Education Leads (ex-student, previous joint
    project, Partnership meetings)
  • Insider knowledge of some of the organisation (or
    so I thought!)
  • Some insight into the organisational culture from
    previous project
  • Did not feel an insider but had more knowledge
    than a new to the field outsider would have
    (general language, cultural norms, etc)
  • Confidential documents shared when trust
    developed
  • Being an insider researcher is not necessarily
    the same as being a member of the organisation
    being researched (Hellawell 2006 484)

13
(No Transcript)
14
Outsider advantages/disadvantages
  • May be risk of over-familiarity and
    taken-for-granted assumptions
  • Stranger going native
  • More objectivity, diagnostic function to feed
    back observations
  • Traditional role of the external consultant
  • Maybe less expectations of active participation
    in the social world of those under study
  • No research really value-free all action
    researchers are part of the social scene they are
    studying (Titchen and Binnie 1993)

15
Was I an outsider?
  • Role duality when role boundaries can be
    flexible
  • Can be physically in one role and behaviourally
    in another (Pryor 2005)
  • Felt I was on a continuum and challenged the
    polarity of the insider or outsider
    researcher identity (Bridges
  • Had multiple integrities deepening awareness
    of what research integrity and trust must entail
    ( Drake and Heath 2007)
  • multiple identities researcher, manager in
    local HEI, knew a number of the FG participants,
    university representative, ex-course/module
    leader, fellow student, woman, nurse,
    counsellor..

16
Multiple roles role conflict
  • Sometimes felt I was wearing too many hats
  • Not always clear when organisation members spoke
    to be in confidence if talking to me as
    researcher or in my HEI organisational role
  • Unexpected strength of politics, abuses of power,
    cover ups, rhetoric and reality (Holian 1999)

17
Watch out for the crocodiles
18
Backlash the personal impact
  • Insider researchers may need to be cautioned and
    reminded that the research mantle may seem
    magical and may reveal earth-shattering insights,
    but it is not bullet proof (Holian and Brooks
    200414)
  • May raise things that are undiscussable
  • Can be uncomfortable and frightening, risk of
    burnout
  • Final presentation was hijacked and behind closed
    doors to Head of HR and deputy
  • Can I now publish this study?
  • Will the organisation use the HEI again?
  • Pressure to tell the truth and maintain
    integrity of the research process, stick to my
    principles
  • PCT required register of those who attended FGs
  • Sense that staff were sent rather than
    volunteered

19
Survival skills
  • Phone a friend
  • Reflective diary
  • Supervisor support
  • Sharing experiences
  • Need to build in strategies to avoid bias to
    enhance the credibility of the study

20
Focus of Researcher and System in
insider-research projects (Coghlan and Brannick
2005)
RESEARCHER
No intended self-study in action
  • Traditional research approaches
  • Collection of survey data
  • ethnography
  • case study
  • 2. Pragmatic action research
  • Internal consulting
  • action learning

Intended self-study in action
SYSTEM
3. Individual engaged in reflective study of
professional practise
4. Large scale transformational change
Intended self-study in action
21
Quadrant 1
  • Absence of self-study in action by both
    researcher and system
  • There is study but not deliberately in-action
  • Researcher focusing on a perspective, issues or
    problem within the system as if external to
    himself/herself
  • Unobtrusive observer of the inner life of
  • No deliberate self-reflection in-action as part
    of the research process

22
Quadrant 2
  • Pragmatic or mechanistic action research
    directed at confronting and resolving a
    pre-identified issue
  • For example, management action, internal
    consulting projects and some action learning
  • Typically research undertaken in educational
    programmes e.g. MBA
  • Maybe internal researcher working with external
    consultant (or both in my case!)

23
Quadrant 3
  • Researcher is engaged in self-study of herself in
    action for professional practice but the system
    is not
  • Organistic-orientated action research where the
    inquiry process is a value in itself
  • Research may be pre-selected (e.g. on the
    researchers job or role) or may emerge from
    Quadrant 2 project

24
Quadrant 4
  • Researcher and system are engaged in intended
    study in action
  • System has made a commitment to change
  • Researchers role involved being part of the
    collective reflection and learning and
    articulating what is happening

25
Application to this LNA study
  • Quad 2 started as a straightforward educational
    consultancy project, or so I thought!
  • Quad 2 -action researcher finding that the
    problem being researched was a symptom of
    underlying cultural assumptions, resolution
    carried more far reaching implications that
    envisaged at the outset
  • Quad 2 to 3 -Personal development journey
  • Quad 4 would need to be more insider-outsider
    collaboration for large scale system change
  • Political framework (Clarke 2003) useful for
    analysing the impact of politics to the LNA
    studies

26
A framework for analysing the impact of politics
in LNA studies (Clarke 2003)
27
Final thoughts
  • Insiders and Outsiders in the domain of
    knowledge, unite. You have nothing to lose but
    your claims. You have a world of understanding to
    win
  • Merton (1972 44)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com