General Circulation Modelling on Triton and Pluto - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

General Circulation Modelling on Triton and Pluto

Description:

... Triton totally covered by CO2 frost. Case # 2 Triton Unfrosted Equatorial band ... Show the sensitivity of the frost distribution to topography (i.e. pressure, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: for7150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: General Circulation Modelling on Triton and Pluto


1
General Circulation Modelling on Triton and Pluto
  • F. Forget (N. Descamps)
  • LMD, ISPL Paris

2
General Circulation Models ? GCMs ? Global
Climate modelsDesigned to completely simulate
a terrestrial planet environment
  • Used on Earth for all climate science (weather
    forecast, data assimilation climatology,
    chemistry, plaeoclimate, climate change,
    biosphere studies)
  • Mars idem
  • Titan idem
  • Venus under developement
  • Triton
  • ? Pluto

3
Triton and Pluto very thin atmospheres
  • Triton 1.4 Pa , mostly N2, with some CH4 (in
    1989)
  • 2-4 or 6 Pa today ?
  • Pluto 1-5 Pa , N2, with a little CO, Ar, CH4
  • The pressure is high enough to fully compute the
    dynamic with the primitive equation of
    meteorology
  • (GCM thermosphere are used up to 10-8 Pa)
  • BUT Specific processes related to the direct
    condensation/sublimation of a large part of the
    atmosphere

4
Turbulent Mixing in the planetary boundary layer
  • On Pluto and Triton effect of surface
    condensation sublimation
  • We use Turbulent closure scheme based on Mellor
    and Yamada 2.5 parameterisation specially
    adapted to stable atmosphere (Forget et al. 1999)
    numerical algorithm to compute the
    condensation/sublimation effect (Forget et al.
    1998)

Condensation
Sublimation
Bare Ground
5
  • Surface condensation of N2
  • Near Surface enrichment of other gases
  • ?The near surface composition can strongly
    enriched with less volatile species (Ar ?)
  • Affect near surface condensation temperature
  • Density Induced convection
  • Affect fluid dynamics, etc
  • Very alien meteorology !

6
4 3 2 1
  • Numerical algorithm adapted from Mars
  • (Forget et al. 2006, Granada abstracts)

7
Experience with Mars CO2 polar caps
8
MARS Detection of Argon enrichment due to CO2
condensationby Mars Oddyssey Gamma Ray
Spectrometer(GRS)(mean Ar mixing ratio in
75S-90S)
Sprague et al. 2004
9
Mars polar night
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Sublimation of CO2 ice and snow on Mars
1 km
13
(No Transcript)
14
Formation of Spider in the criptic region
(Piqueux et al. 2003Kieffer et al. 2006)
15
Formation of Spider in the criptic region
(Piqueux et al. 2003)
16
Some results with Triton GCM
17
TRITON ATMOSPHERE
  • Some things we know about Triton in 1989
  • Surface dark streaks direction eastward
    surface wind in the southern hemisphere
  • Geyser like Plumes
  • Westward wing at 8 km in the southern hemisphere
  • Tropopause around 8 km
  • What we dont know well
  • Surface frost distribution (N2, CO, CH4, )

18
Triton General Circulation Model
  • 1) Hydrodynamical code
  • to compute large scale atmospheric motions
  • and transport
  • Grid point model
  • Horizontal resolution 200 km (32x24)
  • 15 vertical layers (5m, 20m, 50 km)
  • 2) Physical parameterizations
  • ? to force the dynamic
  • to compute the details of
  • the local climate

Flux from thermosphere
T(z)
Thermal conduction
Atm N2 condensation
Convection
Turbulence
Surface N2 condensation
Internal heat flux
Subsurface conduction (13 layers)
19
  • Triton free atmosphere processes hypothesis
  • No radiative transfer below 40 km (Yelle et al.
  • Conduction Temperature below 40 km insensitive
    to thermosphere variations (400 km)
  • ?Constant flux from thermosphere

Example of temperature profiles
Amplitude of temperature variations
400 km 60 km 40 km
Tmean
Tmin
Tmax
Period 1 triton day
Diurnal cycle
Period 15 Earth years
20
Case 1 Triton totally covered by CO2 frost
  • Flux top 1.15 10-6 W m-2
  • Ice emissivity 0.6
  • Thermal inertia 293 SI
  • Flux géothermique 0.06 W m-2
  • Albedo

0.85
0.6
90S 20S 25N 90N
21
Case 1 Triton totally covered by CO2 frost
With condensation effect
No condensation effect
22
Case 1 Triton totally covered by CO2 frost
Retro-super-rotation
23
Case 1 Triton totally covered by CO2 frost
Plume ( 8km)
Wind streaks
Plumes (z8km)
60S
40S
surface
20S
24
Case 2 Triton Unfrosted Equatorial band(from
Ingersoll 1990)
  • Flux top 1.15 10-6 W m-2
  • Ice emissivity 0.6
  • Thermal inertia 293 SI
  • Flux géothermique 0.06 W m-2
  • Albedo

0.85
0.6
90S 20S 25N 90N
25
Case 2 Triton Unfrosted Equatorial band
26
Case 2 Triton Unfrosted Equatorial band
27
Case 2 Triton Unfrosted Equatorial band
Plume ( 8km)
Wind streaks
Plumes (z8km)
Plume ( 8km)
Wind streaks
Plumes (z8km)
60S
40S
surface
60S
40S
20S
surface
20S
28
Case 3 Frost Free Southern hemisphere( Dark
cap model , Hansen and Paige, 1992)
  • Flux top 1.15 10-6 W m-2
  • Ice emissivity 0.53
  • Thermal inertia
  • Flux géothermique 0.06 W m-2
  • Albedo

0.8
0.6
90S 30N 90N
29
Case 3 Frost Free Southern hemisphere( Dark
cap model , Hansen and Paige, 1992)
30
Case 3 Frost Free Southern hemisphere( Dark
cap model , Hansen and Paige, 1992)
31
Case 3 Frost Free Southern hemisphere( Dark
cap model , Hansen and Paige, 1992)
Plume ( 8km)
Wind streaks
Plumes (z8km)
60S
40S
surface
20S
32
Triton first findings from GCM
  • General results consistent with voyager
    observations in 1989
  • Tropopause around 8 km
  • Wind streaks diection
  • But Enigma prograde winds at plume location
  • Most likely Atmospheric absorbent (CH4)
  • Sensitivity to Frost locations
  • ? Simplified GCM used to explore the frost
    distributions on Triton

33
New calculation of Triton seasonal variations
required to compute cap evolution (Forget et al.
2000)
34
Example Dark cap model Suggested by Hansen
and Paige (1991) ? Fail to explain pressure
increase
35
Example Dark cap model Suggested by Hansen
and Paige (1991) ? Fail to explain pressure
increase
36
High thermal inertia model (inspired by Spencer
and Moore 1992) Inertia 500 SI It works
! Show the sensitivity of the frost distribution
to topography (i.e. pressure, geothermal flux
assymetry)
37
High thermal inertia model (inspired by Spencer
and Moore 1992) Inertia 500 SI It works
! Show the sensitivity of the frost distribution
to topography (i.e. pressure, geothermal flux
assymetry) ?Also true for Pluto
38
Adapting Triton GCM to Pluto
  • Require to add radiative transfer modelling with
    CH4 (Strobel et al. 1995)
  • Solar heating at 3.3 et 2.3 µm (NLTE)
  • NLTE emission at 7.6 µm ?
  • LTE cooling by rotational lines (CO)
  • Very interesting atmosphere !
  • Role of hazes and clouds
  • Like on Triton ?Much to learn from simplified GCM
    (EBL) with interactive caps topography
  • To be continued
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com