Experimental Components for the Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Experimental Components for the Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval Systems

Description:

Experimental Components for the Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval Systems ... The Experimental Setting. 3 components: The involvement of potential ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: dawnf5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Experimental Components for the Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval Systems


1
  • Experimental Components for the Evaluation of
    Interactive Information Retrieval Systems
  • Pia Borlund

Dawn Filan3/30/04610551
2
The Goal
  • To evaluate IR systems in a way that is as close
    to actual information seeking process as
    possible, while still being in a controlled
    environment.

3
Research Questions
  • Can simulated information needs be substituted
    for real information needs?
  • What makes a good simulated situation with
    reference to semantic openness and types of
    topics of the simulated situations?

4
Hybrid Evaluation Model
  • Increased demand
  • Relevance revolution
  • Cognitive revolution
  • Interactive revolution
  • Combine two main approaches
  • System-driven approach (controlled)
  • Cognitive user-centered approach (realism)

5
The Experimental Setting
  • 3 components
  • The involvement of potential users as test
    persons
  • The application of dynamic and individual
    information needs
  • Use of dynamic relevance judgements

6
Ideal IIR Setting
  • Real users who state personal information needs
    to the system and judge the relevance of the
    retrieved documents under controlled
    circumstances.
  • Use of simulated work task
  • Must be under controlled circumstances so that
    results can be compared across systems and user
    groups.

7
Simulated Work Task
  • Triggers and develops a simulated information
    need by allowing for user interpretations of the
    situation.
  • Platform against which situational relevance is
    measured.
  • 2 variants applied
  • Complete need applied (sim 1)
  • Only situation applied (sim 2)

8
Situational Relevance
  • User-centered, realistic, and dynamic measure of
    relevance
  • Judgements are not based on the request or query,
    but rather relate to the persons requirements
    and mental state at the time of the retrieval
  • Assessed continuously and interactively during
    the session

9
Relevance (Schamber, Eisenberg, and Nilan)
  • Multidimensional cognitive concept whose meaning
    is dependant in users perceptions of information
    and their information needs
  • Dynamic concept that depends on users judgements
    of quality of the relationship between
    information and the information need
  • Complex but systematic and measurable concept if
    approached conceptually and operationally from
    the users perspective

10
Meta-Evaluation
  • Should simulated work tasks be recommended as a
    component of the experimental setting for
    evaluating IIR systems?

11
Meta-Evaluation Questions
  • Possibility of substituting real information
    needs with simulated information needs through
    the application of simulated work task
    situations.
  • Whether the variants of the simulated task makes
    any difference to the test persons treatment of
    the information need
  • What characterizes a good simulated work task in
    terms of how tailored the task should be to the
    user

12
Test Setting
  • Full-text online system applying TREC data and
    probabilistic-based retrieval engine
  • Search activity and relevance scores were logged
  • 24 users from various academic backgrounds and
    education levels
  • Asked to prepare a personal information need

13
Testing Procedure
  • Brief questionnaire
  • Introduction
  • Explanation of the test persons role
  • Demo of the system
  • Execution of 6 search tasks (training, real, 4
    simulated tasks)
  • Post-search interview

14
Conclusions
  • One can substitute real information needs with
    simulated information through the application of
    simulated work tasks
  • One can mix simulated and real information needs
  • Treatment of the information need did not differ
    between the group that received the work task and
    request, and those who received just the work
    task.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com