Food Distribution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Food Distribution

Description:

It is estimated that the Ethiopian population will rise in the next twenty years ... In 2002, Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi said that Ethiopia could undergo ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:157
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: pc67328
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Food Distribution


1
Food Distribution
  • Carson Hoffacker
  • Jasdeep Mangat
  • Patrick Crotty
  • Ranil Ignatius

2
World Facts
  • Already at over 6 billion people, the global
    population is increasing rapidly and creating a
    serious strain on food production and
    distribution.
  • In an attempt to expand our usable farm land,
    massive areas are being deforested, causing soil
    erosion and flooding.
  • Overuse of lands that are just barely suitable
    for growth is turning what were once fields into
    deserts, and eliminating important crop and
    pasture land.

3
World Facts
  • Misuse of irrigation water is leading to a
    buildup of harmful salt deposits on what used to
    be fertile crop land, reducing the total
    available farming land
  • Increased supplies and declining prices for farm
    products mean more food for the poor, it also
    makes smaller farms less feasible, and reduces
    the standard of living for those operation
    smaller farms.
  • As we have seen in previous presentations,
    livestock and crops are becoming increasingly
    genetically uniform, presenting new risks to
    farmers.

4
World Facts
  • Many of the emergencies we face in the modern
    world such as famine, crop failure, floods,
    drought and war, are at least partially a result
    of changes man made to the environment.
  • The major cause of world famine used to be
    massive crop failure, today it is caused by poor
    management and government regulations.
  • In 2002, we have half the number of farmers we
    did in 1977.

5
World Facts
  • Small farmers have been pushed out in the
    interest of sanitation, as only larger producers
    can afford expensive sanitation technology. The
    result has been the removal of germs, and the
    addition of poisons used in large scale farming

6
Agrarian Farming
  • Traditional Farming
  • High crop diversity
  • Sustains health of the land
  • Farms based on the specific location of the farm
  • Understands limited resources (land, plants,
    animals, weather, water)
  • Live within the limits

7
Industrialized Farming
  • Modern Farming, very corporate
  • Heavy on technology
  • Looks at farming as a form of mining
  • Very abusive towards land. Farms the American
    West like it farms the American West like it
    farms India
  • Farms are abandoned when costs of maintaining the
    farm is more than profits
  • No crop diversity

8
Case Study DDT
  • DDT stand for dichloro-diphenyl-trichloro-ethane
  • Insecticidal properties discovered in 1942,
    founder received Nobel Prize for his discovery
  • Was hailed as the savior of mankind
  • Effects the nervous system of insects and
    mammals. Causes muscle spasms, which may lead to
    death
  • DDT remains in its toxic state for years, one
    spray on crops could last many seasons
  • From 1945-1955 DDT production increased from 125
    million pounds to 600 million pounds.

9
Case Study DDT
  • DDT is not metabolized rapidly by animals
    instead, it is deposited and stored in the fatty
    tissues.
  • The half-life of DDT is about eight years, it
    takes about eight years for an animal to
    metabolize half of the amount it assimilates.
  • Birds exposed to DDT by eating infected insects
    had trouble reproducing, egg shells were thin
  • This caused the eagle population to plummet
  • US banned DDT in 1973, still in use in some other
    countries

10
Professional Issues
  • Farmers make more money by using pesticides
    increasing crop output
  • By using more pesticides they are putting the
    health of farmers and the environment at risk

11
Legal Issues
  • When new pesticides are developed the long term
    effects are hard to determine
  • Just because it is legal doesnt mean its safe
  • New pesticides are developed constantly, makes
    them difficult to regulate because the law can
    not keep up with the private sector

12
Stakeholders
  • People who eat food
  • Farmers
  • Insects
  • Animals
  • Environment

13
Possible Actions
  • Agrarian Organic farming
  • Keep Industrialized farming

14
Utilitarian Perspective
  • Pros
  • -Allows the small farm to profit
  • -No chemicals in consumer foods
  • -Better for land, can sustain a farm for longer
  • Cons
  • -Organic farming makes crops more expensive
  • -Less crop output

15
Rights Perspective
  • Right for people to eat uncontaminated food
  • Right for farmers to be able to profit
  • Right for farmers to own farm land
  • Right for everyone to be able to afford food

16
Fairness Perspective
  • Agrarian
  • Healthier work environment
  • Healthier food
  • Higher costs
  • Industrialized
  • More food
  • More affordable
  • Fewer jobs
  • Food with chemicals

17
Common Good
  • Agrarian
  • Land is reusable
  • Greater crop diversity
  • Crops are healthier to eat
  • Better for the environment
  • Helps the small farm
  • Farms each area uniquely according to the
    environment
  • Industrialized
  • Can feed more people at a lower cost

18
Final Decision
  • We should downsize industrial farming and
    encourage organic alternatives

19
U.S. Hunger Facts
  • 33 million people, including 13 million children,
    live in households that experience a risk of
    hunger.
  • 7.3 of US households are at risk of hunger they
    have lower quality diets, or resort to seeking
    emergency food because they cannot afford the
    food they need. This includes 9.9 million
    children.
  • Preschool and school age children who experience
    severe hunger have higher levels of illness,
    anxiety and depression, and behavior problems
    when compared with normal children.

20
International Hunger Facts
  • More than 840 million people in the world are
    malnourished. More than 153 million of them are
    under the age of 5.
  • 6 million children under the age of 5 die each
    year as a result of hunger.
  • Children who are affected by hunger prevent
    significantly lower on math and language
    achievement than do well nourished children.
  • In developing countries 91 children out of a 1000
    die before their 5th birthday, as compared to the
    U.S. where only 8 would die.
  • 23 children die every minute from hunger
  • Americans spend more on pet food each than it
    would cost to feed the starving people in the
    world.

21
CASE STUDY ETHIOPIA
22
Facts
  • Half of Ethiopia's children under the age of five
    are malnourished.
  • It is estimated that the Ethiopian population
    will rise in the next twenty years from
    sixty-three million to one hundred million.
  • 17.2 of kids in Ethiopia die before they reach
    the age of five.

23
Background
  • In 2002, Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi
    said that Ethiopia could undergo a famine that is
    worse than the one in 1984, which killed almost
    one million people.
  • Ethiopia undergoes frequent droughts and it
    doesnt have the infrastructure to save a
    sufficient amount of water when the rain does
    fall. In most years, they fail to supply enough
    water to make sure there is a sufficient harvest.

24
Background Cont.
  • Most years, Ethiopia has to depend on aid from
    other countries to feed their people.
  • In 2002, the prime minister said that six million
    people are in immediate need of aid. Also
    mentioned was that that number could increase to
    about 15 million if they didnt receive help from
    other countries.

25
Background Cont.
  • Government officials state that 15 percent of the
    October/November 2002 harvest was destroyed
    because of severe drought conditions. This
    results in the failure of root vegetables and
    green crops, and families that depend on
    subsistence farming will lack food, and also
    seeds for replanting in the upcoming year.

26
What is being done to help the fight against
hunger?
  • Early warning network- This is a program that was
    established by the United States. It basically
    keeps track of the food situation in
    underprivileged countries.
  • This network has played a huge role in keeping
    track of Ethiopias food crisis and has helped
    the country to be more alert to upcoming rain
    shortfalls.
  • Prime Minister Meles Zenawi warns developed
    countries that they should not underestimate a
    drought just because there havent been pictures
    on television with skeletal figures.

27
What is being done to help the fight against
hunger? Cont.
  • Food for the Hungry, an organization, has made a
    three-year program that has assisted over 42,000
    people. This program helps in crop production,
    water supply, and environment rehabilitation.
  • Food for the Hungry has also distributed food to
    over 474,000 people in Ethiopia.
  • World Vision, CARE and Catholic Relief Services
    are working together on a project funded by a
    100 million U.S. grant to deliver food and
    assistance to eight high-risk countries in
    southern Africa, including Ethiopia.

28
Professional Issues
  • Food hunger in Ethiopia means a loss for their
    economy.
  • Because Ethiopia doesnt have the proper
    infrastructure to keep a well rounded
    environment, many Ethiopians will lose the jobs
    they have in the agricultural industry.
  • Because the world is so interconnected today,
    reducing hunger in the world will help US
    interests. It will make for political stability,
    and it will create more markets for US exports.

29
Legal/Policy Issues
  • There is no such law that states that stable
    international countries have to help those in
    need.
  • Some argue that it is not the responsibility of
    countries like the US to take care of the hungry
    in other parts of the world. They believe it is
    the responsibility of their own governments.

30
Ethical Issues
  • Should a stable country help out another country
    that is suffering from food hunger? Is it their
    duty to do so?
  • If so, then how much do you go to help them out?
    Do you just send food or do you give them money
    or do you try and resolve the problem?

31
Stakeholders
  • Any country that is suffering from food hunger.
  • The countries that have the resources to help the
    needy.
  • Basically, the whole world.

32
Possible Actions
  • Developed countries that have the proper
    resources to help food hunger should do
    everything they can to help. They shouldnt just
    send food and money to the countries. They
    should also try and resolve the problem, if it is
    something that can be resolved. That way, that
    country will have the ability to be more stable
    in the future.
  • The other option is to let the governments of the
    countries in need deal with their own problems.

33
Utilitarian Perspective
  • This says that Of any two actions, the most
    ethical one will produce the greatest balance of
    benefits over harms.
  • Help with hunger
  • Pros
  • People in need will get the attention they
    deserve.
  • Less people will suffer from malnutrition.
  • Children will have the ability for a normal
    upbringing.
  • Cons
  • Countries that help will have to make room in
    their budget to help others with their situation.
  • Some countries may become dependent on others for
    help every time they face a problem.

34
Utilitarian Perspective Cont.
  • Let countries deal with food hunger on their own
  • Pros
  • The countries will learn to solve their own
    problems.
  • The government can have more stability if the
    people believe the government can make a positive
    difference.
  • Cons
  • If the government cannot survive on their own,
    the people will suffer in the end.
  • Many could possibly starve from malnutrition.
  • Deaths in countries with food hunger could
    possibly increase heavily.

35
Individual Rights/Fairness
  • States to Act in ways that respect the dignity
    of other persons by honoring or protecting their
    legitimate moral rights.
  • Every individual in this world should have the
    right to a proper meal.
  • Many developed countries have enough wealth, so
    they should have a moral responsibility to share
    some of their wealth in order to reduce hunger in
    the rest of the world.
  • Many industrialized countries have plenty of
    resources. If they all put their resources
    together, underprivileged individuals could have
    the necessities every human should receive.

36
Common Good
  • This principle states, What is ethical is what
    advances the common good.
  • As a community, we are morally responsible to
    help those we can.
  • Having world hunger is not a good thing. To
    achieve common good, we must think of the needs
    of others and provide whatever we can.

37
Bibliography
  • World Hunger Year Innovative Solutions to Hunger
    Poverty. 2003. WHY. 18 Nov. 2003.
    lthttp//www.worldhungeryear.orggt
  • Why is Ethiopia Facing Another Famine? 2002. BBC
    News. 16 Nov. 2003. lthttp//news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wo
    rld/africa/2440793.stmgt
  • Struggling Ethiopia Faces More Hunger. 2000. CNN
    News. 16 Nov. 2003. lthttp//www.cnn.com/2000/WORLD
    /africa/04/11/ethiopia.famine/gt
  • Berry, Wendel. The Unsettling of America. 1996.
    Eco Books. 16 Nov. 2003. lthttp//www.ecobooks.com/
    books/outofprint/unsettli.htmgt
  • Berry, Wendel. The Agrarian Standard. 2002. Orion
    Online. 16 Nov. 2003. lthttp//www.oriononline.org/
    pages/om/02-3om/Berry.htmlgt
  • Ethical Issues in Food and Agriculture. 2001.
    Food and Agriculture Organization. 16 Nov. 2003.
    lthttp//www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X9601E/X9601E00.HTM
    gt
  • Parnes, Robin. How Organic Food Works. 2001. How
    Stuff Works. 16 Nov. 2003. lthttp//home.howstuffwo
    rks.com/organic-food.htmgt
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com