Title: Radiological Preparedness Case Studies: Training for Accidents
1Radiological Preparedness Case Studies
Training for Accidents Dirty Bombs
- Carl Schopfer
- Carl.Schopfer_at_UMDNJ.edu
Senior Research Assistant NJ Center for Public
Health Preparedness
2How to Educate a Diverse Population?
- Health educators
- Higher education professionals
- Mental Health responders
- Volunteer disaster response groups
- Employees of industrial facilities
- Law enforcement
- Health officers
- Environmental health specialists
- Emergency Response groups
- Infection control professionals
- Epidemiologists
Emily Perry, NJCPHP Center Manager
3Various Training Approaches
- Didactic Training
- Web-Based Courses
- Distance Education Modules
- Lectures, Seminars Workshops
- Case-Based Curriculum Development
- Use for students with diverse learning levels
- Allow students to focus on different aspects
- Emphasizes skills over facts learned
- Advantage for adult students
- Rated high for future relevance and skills
Am. J. Preventive Medicine, May 2003 Supp.
Lloyd F. Novick, MD, MPH
4Why Study Accidents to Prepare for Terror?
- Fortunately, no radiological attacks..Yet
- Major accidents involve several groups
- Governments
- Emergency Services
- Public
- Outside Technical Experts
- Media
- Healthcare Community
- These groups interact in complex ways
- There is a need for quick accurate response
5Case Study - Three Mile Island
- Learn the rationale for a KI distribution plan
and the risks and benefits of implementation - Describe on what points to counsel patients and
public about radiation risk - Understand the concepts behind the terms
radiation exposure, absorbed dose, dose
equivalent, collective DE - Identify reliable sources of information
- Identify populations at risk
6Case study - Chernobyl
- Describe how to identify acute radiation syndrome
- Distinguish between external and internal
contamination - Learn the basics of management of radiological
casualties - Identify specialized state and federal radiation
response resources - Advice to give on monitoring and decontamination
of people, equipment, property and the environment
7Case Study - Goiania
- Describe how the public should be informed of
hazardous areas, and of protective actions - How to address protection of the water and food
supply - How to address mass concern, mental health and
behavioral health issues - Explain the basics of radiation background
- Distinguish between external and internal
contamination - Describe how clean is clean, and what is a
safe dose level
8What is the Terror Threat?
- Radiological Dispersion Device (RDD)
- Dirty Bomb - conventional explosive disperses
material - Doesnt have heat, blast, prompt radiation
effects of nuclear bomb - Covert Placement or Dispersal
- Placement of high-intensity source
- Simple contamination or poisoning
- Sabotage of Nuclear Power, Transport or Storage
Facility - Improvised Nuclear Device or Actual Weapon
- Suitcase Nukes
- Use of fissile material to initiate fission
reaction - Other device to disperse radioactive material
9Radiological Nuclear Weapons Availability
- Nuclear Weapons require resources of a nation
- Is high tech, but accomplished in 1945
- Can be stolen, perhaps bypass safeguards
- Would not have to be high-yield
- RDD the Next Best Thing
- Considered in WWII and tested by Iraq in 1980s
- Military an area denial weapon
- Simple construction, deployment
- Simple Dispersal or Placement
- Sabotage or Outright Attack
10Weapons of Mass Destruction
- Attractive to Terrorists
- Have a high effect / resource ratio
- Use target organization resources against itself
- Can be done covertly, making deterrence difficult
- CBRNE are scary and useful against soft targets
- RDDs and Nuclear Attacks
- Nuclear weapon large loss of life, physical
damage and economic impact, and long-term
radioactive contamination - RDDs potentially economic impact, and long-term
radioactive contamination
11Radiological Terrorist Events
- Izmailovo Park, Moscow Chechen insurgents place a
dynamite/radiocesium device which did not explode
(1996) - Argun, Chechnya Suspected Chechen rebels deploy
an explosive mine with unidentified radioactive
material (1998) - Chicago, USA Jose Padilla arrested on suspicion
of planning to build and detonate a dirty bomb
(2002) - Herat, Afghanistan British Intelligence weapons
researchers conclude Al Qaeda succeeded in
constructing a small dirty bomb (2003)
12Radiological Accidents
- Windscale, U.K. (1957)
- Palomares, Spain (1966)
- Three Mile Island, USA (1979)
- Goiania, Brazil (1987)
- Chernobyl, USSR (1986)
- Tomsk, USSR (1993)
- Tokaimura, Japan (1999)
13Radiological Dispersion Device
- The Department of Defense definition
- "any device, including any weapon or equipment,
other than a nuclear explosive device,
specifically designed to employ radioactive
material by disseminating it to cause
destruction, damage, or injury by means of the
radiation produced by the decay of such
material. - Radiation presence may not be immediately obvious
- Unless strong source, prompt radiation injury
unlikely - Significant contamination of people and
environment
14Preparing for a Radiological Attack
- Enhance awareness of acute radiation symptoms and
treatment among healthcare providers - Educate first responder and healthcare providers
on contamination and low-level radiation issues. - Provide basic detection capability for security
organizations and first responders. - Identify State Federal Support capabilities,
clarify responsibilities - Stockpile radiation exposure antidotes.
- Prepare educational materials to inform the
public during and after an attack
15Radiation Physics Basics
- Ionizing but a relatively weak carcinogen and
mutagen - Comprised of particulate electromagnetic
radiation - a alpha b beta g gamma x x-rays n
neutron - Measures of radiation exposure
- Exposure, absorbed dose, dose equivalent
- Internal versus External Exposure
- Time, Distance, Shielding
16Radiation Background
- Several sources
- Cosmic
- Terrestrial
- Anthropogenic
300 mrem/yr
Source NCRP
17RDD Likely Impacts
- Expected to be terror and an expensive clean-up
- Contamination of Victims Environment
- Effect on Emergency Response
- Societal Effects
- Possible Benefits!?
18Contamination - Victims and Environment
- Likely to have zero to small number of fatalities
within the immediate deployment area - Injuries from blast effects
- most significant
- Stress-related injuries
- Moderate to wide-spread contamination
19Effect on Emergency Response
- Immediate, radiation-related health effects
unlikely - Depends on size of RDD, location, conditions
- Assessment of high radiation level can be made
quickly - Concern radioactive contamination may slow
response - Most important Treat conventionally wounded
first -
Decontaminate later - Protect sensitive populations
- Public Health Sector Preparedness
- Prevent worried well from impacting system
- Triage where necessary
20Societal Effects
- Potential for initial public panic
- Concern whether large-scale relocation needed
- Economic Impact
- Potentially enormous, both business and personal
- Protracted societal distraction
- Political capital expended on clean-up priorities
- Large governmental clean-up costs
- Health Effects
- Psychological effects
- Increased cancer risk
- Long-term environmental monitoring
21Possible Benefits!?
- Force resolution of radioactive waste clean-up
and disposal issues, including driving down
disposal costs - Educate lay public about radiation risk
- Tighter hazardous materials controls reduce
accidents - Hormesis?!
22Post-Event Clean-Up
- Possible to clean-up to pre-event levels?
- Probably not
- But health can be protected
- Economic costs and use restrictions
23Radioactive Material Characteristics
- Detection
- Cannot detect with senses
- Requires specialized equipment and training
- Physical form
- Initially, an airborne solid, dust or gas.
- Will adhere to surfaces, may dissolve in water.
- May re-suspend over time
- Persistence
- Depends on the half-life
- Environmental transport depends on chemistry, but
also physical factors - Both dilution and bio-concentration
24Radioisotope Candidates
- 137Cs
- 60Cu
- 192Ir
- 226Ra
- 241Am
- 239Pu
- Uranium
- 3H
- Irradiators industrial sources
- Irradiators
- Irradiators industrial sources
- Irradiators industrial sources
- Industrial sources
- Industrial sources
- Industrial sources
- Research, medical, consumer
25Health Effects
- Cannot feel or sense an exposure of any magnitude
- Acute Radiation Syndrome
- LD50 approx 300 rad (3Gy) adult, untreated
- Latency period - characteristic of
radiation-induced carcinogenesis - Low level exposure - increased risk of cancer
26Acute Effects
- Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS)
- Nausea, vomiting and diarrhea
- Cataracts
- Hair loss
- LD50 approx 300 rad (3Gy) adult, untreated
- Loss of white blood cells
- Radiation cataracts (lens opacity)
- Death
27Low Level Effects
- Genetic Effects
- Cancer risks among the atomic-bomb survivors
- Site-specific cancer deaths
- Leukemia risks among atomic-bomb survivors
- Benign tumors uterus, parathyroid, thyroid
- Deaths due to non-cancer disease
- Effect on cholesterol levels, fertility, growth
- Chromosome aberrations in white blood cells
- Mutation in blood cells
- Effects upon the immune system
- Psychological effects
- Hormesis
28How To Know When an RDD is Used?
- Unexplained deaths of otherwise healthy
individuals, ARS symptoms - Suspicious explosion or fire, forensics
- Detection by emergency services
- Intelligence services
- Specialized detection equipment, monitoring
stations - Announcement or claim of perpetrators
29 Treatment Guidelines Acute
- NCRP65
- AFRRI Biodosimetry Assessment Tool
- VA Pocket Card
30http//www.oqp.med.va.gov/cpg/uploads/bcr/RadCard9
.pdf
31Patient Management and Treatment Low Level
Exposures
- Treat life-threatening conditions FIRST
- Remove Clothing
- Decontaminate
- Copious water with mild soap
- Do not use abrasives or brushes
32Healthcare Personnel Protection
- Triage and admitting may need PPE
- Unless patients are very hot, exposure to
providers should be minimal - See webcast available on the CDC website
- Response to Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism
33Radiation Detection
- Environmental Monitors
- Site/Station Monitors
- Portable Equipment
- Radiation Safety Departments
- Laboratories
34Technical Assistance RAP map
35Selected References
- NCRP Report 138, Management of Terrorist Events
Involving Radioactive Material - NCRP Report 65 Management of Persons Accidentally
Contaminated with Radionuclides - Google it!
36(No Transcript)
37Internet Resources (1)
- National Safety Council, Environmental Health
Center. Link for radiation at - http//www.nsc.org/ehc/rad/radbroch.htm
- Centers for Disease Control, Emergency
Preparedness Response, Radiation Emergencies - http//www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation
- Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training
Site - http//www.orau.gov/reacts
38Internet Resources (2)
- Department of Homeland Security
- http//www.ready.gov/radiation.html
- American College of Radiology
- Disaster Preparedness for Radiology
Professionals Response to Radiological Terrorism - http//www.acr.org/departments/educ/disaster_prep
/disaster-planning.pdf
39Internet Resources (3)
- howstuffworks
- http//science.howstuffworks.com/dirty-bomb.htm
- Radiation Effects Research Foundation
- http//www.rerf.or.jp
- Health Physics Society
- http//www.hps.org
- International Atomic Energy Agency
- http//www.iaea.org
40Internet Resources (4)
- Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute
- http//www.afrri.usuhs.mil
- Virtual Naval Hospital
- Initial Management of Irradiated or Radioactively
Contaminated Personnel - http//www.vnh.org/BUMEDINST6470.10A/TOC.html
41Other Resources
- RAND http//www.rand.org
- Other Sources of Information
- OHSA, DOE, EPA, NRC
- State Health and Environment Depts.
- Academic Centers for Public Health Preparedness
42Thank you!
- The New Jersey Center for Public Health
Preparedness at UMDNJ - www.NJCPHP.org
- email Carl.Schopfer_at_UMDNJ.edu