Yuri Ermoliev International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Yuri Ermoliev International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

Description:

IIASA. Yuri Ermoliev. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Mathematical methods ... Scenario 2: Insolvency. Optimal solution (0, 10) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: ama1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Yuri Ermoliev International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis


1
Yuri ErmolievInternational Institute for Applied
Systems Analysis
Mathematical methods for robust solutions
2
Facets of robustness
  • Variability of goals
  • Explicit risk measures
  • Concept of flexible solutions

3
A simple standard example
  • The problem How to spend 10 units of money?
  • Invest now with 100 return (A) or
  • Keep money under mattress (B)
  • The deterministic model Maximize the return
    function
  • Optimal solution (10, 0). Return 20
  • Is this a desirable solution ? Uncertainty is
    50/50 with return of 40 or 0.
  • How to deal with such uncertainty?

4
Option 1 Scenario analysis
  • Scenario 1 Real returns 40. Solution (10, 0)
    is still optimal
  • Scenario 2 Insolvency. Optimal solution (0, 10)
  • Solution (0,10) is not optimal for the
    deterministic model, but it is robust against
    all possible scenarios
  • Is there a better solution?
  • In which sense?
  • What about mixed solutions?
  • How can we find them?

5
Option 2 Straightforward sensitivity and
uncertainty analysis
  • Keep changing scenarios of input (uncertainties,
    decision variables, )
  • Evaluations can easily take 100s of years CPU
    time
  • Provides only frequency distributions of output,
    no direct information for decision making
  • How can we find a desirable solution without
    evaluating all feasible alternatives? Need for
    optimization methods

6
Option 3 Decisionoriented methods for
sensitivity and uncertainty analyses
  • Preference structure is more stable than
    outputs
  • What-if scenario analysis
  • Stochastic models
  • Expected utility theory
  • Meanvariance efficiency
  • Stochastic optimization

7
Possible definitions of robustness
  • Risk aversion, proneness, neutrality mean
    variance efficiency
  • Other goals (liabilities, targets, thresholds)?
  • Underestimation of low probability scenarios
  • Partially know distributions?

8
Expected utility theory
  • Summarizes all outcomes and attitudes to risks
    into one preference index
  • Quadratic, logarithmic, exponential, linear,
    convex, concave, utility function?
  • Shape of utility function reflects attitudes to
    risk risk aversion, proneness, neutrality

9
Meanvariance efficiency
  • Returns (costs, benefits, etc.) and additional
    risk measure the variance of returns
  • Symmetric risk measure
  • Normal distribution

10
Stochastic optimization
  • Explicitly deals with different outputs and
    interactions among decisions x and uncertainties
    ?
  • Different goal functions (costs, benefits,
    balances)
  • Concepts of robust solutions involve goals,
    different risk measures and concepts of
    solutions, feasibility, and, in particular,
    their flexibility, which cant be formalized
    within deterministic models.

11
Conclusions
  • All practical problems are solved somehow,
    how is the most important question
  • New problems often require new methods
  • Robustness is characterized by different goals,
    risk measures, and concepts of feasible solutions
  • Formalized in terms of STO models
  • Different methods either exist or can be
    developed, e.g., adaptive Monte Carlo
    optimization procedures
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com