FDN 5000 Research in Education Dr. George H. Olson, Instructor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

FDN 5000 Research in Education Dr. George H. Olson, Instructor

Description:

Should not be confused with the one-shot case study. Threats to internal validity: ... Double reversal: A - B - A - B. Multiple baseline: A - B - A. A - B - A ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: george270
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FDN 5000 Research in Education Dr. George H. Olson, Instructor


1
FDN 5000 Research in Education Dr. George
H. Olson, Instructor
  • Research Designs
  • Descriptive Research Designs
  • Correlation Research Designs
  • Causal-comparative Designs
  • Experimental Designs
  • Non-experimental Designs
  • Single-subject designs

2
Purposes of Research Designs
  • Provide guidance in conducting research
  • Provide guidance in interpreting research
  • Guidance in recognizing types of research
  • Guidance in recognizing potential threats to the
    validity of research conclusions
  • Help guard against threats to internal and
    external validity

3
Descriptive research designs
  • Survey research
  • Longitudinal research designs
  • Cohort designs
  • Quasi-cohort designs
  • Cross-sectional research
  • Case studies
  • Ethnographic studies

4
Correlational research designs
  • Objective study the relationship between
    variables
  • Examine scatter plots (e.g., pages 223 and 225 in
    our text)
  • Compute correlation coefficients
  • range from -1 through 0 to 1
  • do not imply causation
  • lack of correlation does NOT imply no causation

5
Interpreting correlations
  • Rules of thumb
  • Correlation coefficient Strength of
    relationship
  • .00 to .20 negligible
  • .24 to .40 low
  • .40 to .60 moderate
  • .60 to .80 substantial
  • .80 to 1.00 high, very high

6
Causal comparative research designs
  • A.k.a. ex-post-facto designs
  • Aimed at discovering cause and effect
    relationships
  • Defined groups are compared after they have been
    formed
  • Theory plays an important role
  • In arguing for the cause-effect relationship
  • In eliminating rival explanations

7
Causal comparative designs An example
  • Of students receiving the This proportion
    is known to
  • following grades. drive a car to school
  • A 8
  • B 23
  • C 43
  • D 77
  • F 96
  • What should the superintendent conclude?

8
Diagramming Experimental Research Designs
  • Symbols used
  • T treatment intervention
  • C control or comparison condition (often simply
    no treatment)
  • O observation (often some test score)
  • R designates random assignment
  • M designates matching

9
Examples of Research Design Diagrams
  • (1) T O
  • (2) O1 T O2
  • O1 T O2
  • (3) ----------------------- (No Random
    Assignment)
  • O1 C O2

10
Three pre-experimental designs
  • Three designs frequently used in education
    research that
  • are not sufficient for permitting strong tests of
    causal hypotheses
  • often due suggest new ideas
  • One-group posttest-only design
  • One-group pretest-posttest design
  • Comparison-group posttest-only design

11
One-group, posttest-only research design
  • T O
  • A treatment followed by an observation
  • Should not be confused with the one-shot case
    study
  • Threats to internal validity
  • ALL (except regression and mortality)
  • Threats to external validity
  • ALL

12
One-group pretest-posttest research design
  • Opre T Opost
  • One of the most frequently used research designs
    in education
  • Threats to internal validity
  • extraneous events (history and maturation)
  • statistical regression
  • testing
  • experimenter and subject effects
  • Threats to external validity
  • selection and settings interactions with treatment

13
Comparison-group, posttest-only design
  • T O
  • --------------
  • C O
  • --------------
  • C2 O
  • --------------
  • C3 O

14
Comparison-group, posttest-only design
  • Threats to internal validity
  • Since the comparison groups are non-equivalent,
    the major threat is selection
  • Other threats include mortality, and subject and
    experimenter reactive effects
  • Threats to external validity
  • Selection and settings by treatment interaction

15
True experiment research designs
  • Randomized experiments
  • Result in probabilistic equivalence
  • Not a panacea that rules out all threats to
    internal validity
  • Does not control for experimenter and subject
    reactive effects.
  • Does not guarantee group equivalency (especially
    in small samples).

16
Randomized posttest comparison group design
  • T O
  • R ---------------
  • C O
  • Note R means RANDOMIZATION

17
Randomized pretest-posttest control group design
  • Opre T Opost
  • R ---------------------------
  • Opre C Opost
  • R ---------------------------
  • Opre C2 Opost

18
Randomized matched-group design
  • T O
  • M R ---------------
  • C O

19
Randomized factorial designs
  • TA1,B1 O
  • ---------------
  • TA1,B2 O
  • R ---------------
  • TA2,B1 O
  • ---------------
  • TA2,B2 O

20
Factorial Design Example
  • Method (B)____
  • Word Type (A) Computer Handwriting
  • B1 B2
  • Easy A1 20 26
  • Hard A2 16 20
  • ____________________________

21
Quasi-experiments Time series designs
  • O1 O2 O3 O4 T O5 O6 O7 O8
  • Pre-observations to establish a baseline
  • A treatment intervention
  • Post-observations to establish new baseline

22
Quasi-experiments Non-equivalent control groups
  • In these designs, randomization is either not
    possible or not feasible.
  • Characterized by ...
  • using intact groups for treatment and comparison
  • manipulated independent variable
  • Often, the best we can expect from education
    research

23
Non-equivalent, control group, pretest-posttest
design
  • Opre T Opost
  • -------------------------
  • Opre C Opost
  • Except for reactive effects, most threats to
    internal validity are controlled
  • Again settings and selection by treatment
    interactions pose threats to external validity

24
Matched comparison group, posttest design
  • T O
  • M ---------
  • C O
  • Validity depends upon how well matching is
    achieved
  • Potential threats to internal validity are same
    as those for posttest-only designs

25
Single-subject designs
  • Similar to time-series designs, only with a
    single individual
  • Repeated measurements over time (baselines)
  • Subjects serve as their own controls
  • Involve a manipulated independent variable (the
    intervention)

26
Basic single-subject designs
  • Reversal A - B - A
  • Double reversal A - B - A - B
  • Multiple baseline
  • A - B - A
  • ------------------------
  • A - B - A
  • ------------------------
  • A - B - A
  • ------------------------
  • A - B - A
  • A is a period of no treatment
  • B is a period of treatment

27
Example of a stable baseline
28
Example of an increasing baseline
29
Non-experimental research designs
  • Characterized by the lack of manipulation of an
    independent variable
  • Three types of non-experimental research designs
  • Causal comparative research designs
  • Correlational research designs
  • Descriptive research designs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com