Title: Elizabeth Simpkin
1Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and
Modernization Act of 2003
HFMA Medical Groups and Physicians
Committee February 19, 2004
2Profitability - out of physicians' hands?
REVENUE
COST
3Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA)
- 400 billion, 10-year Medicare reform bill
- prescription drug benefit
- bigger role for private health plans
- incentives to employers to continue retiree
benefits - increases payments to rural hospitals and
physicians - health savings accounts (HSAs) for healthcare
expenses - Paid for by
- new money (cut from other programs)
- beneficiary cost sharing and means-testing
- provider reimbursement cuts
4MMA Impact
- Health Plans paid more immediately and in future
incentives to encourage enrollment - PBMs compete for the drug discount card and drug
benefit opportunities - Pharmaceutical industry changes in demand and
pricing due to drug discount cards and drug
benefits - Employers reevaluate retiree benefits in light of
drug benefit and employer subsidies - Providers payment changes in short and long term
changes in beneficiary demand possible shift to
managed care enrollment and increased health plan
leverage
5Funding concerns for providers
- Medicare funding warning Title VIII, subtitle A,
secs 801-804 - kicks in when Medicare spending accounts for 45
of general revenue - Once the 45 trigger is reached two years in a
row, the president must submit recommendations to
improve Medicare solvency - After that Congress has a limited time to act or
the program faces automatic cuts in payments to
providers and services to beneficiaries - Huge discrepancies between White House and
Congressional estimates 534 billion vs. 395
billion over 10 years - Payment and/or service cuts appear possible as
early as 2006
6Implications for physicians or --
- Drug benefit - Part D
- Part B benefit changes
- Medicare Advantage
- Physician-administered drugs
- Physician fee schedule and the update formula
waiting for the other shoe to drop!
7The prescription drug benefit
- Drug Discount Cards 2004-2005
- Beneficiaries can purchase a drug discount card -
30 - Estimated 15-25 savings per prescription
- Subsidies for low-income seniors
- Part D Prescription Drug Benefit 2006
- Voluntary, additional 35 monthly premium,
penalty for late enrollment - 250 Deductible, 25 coinsurance between 251 and
2,250 - Beneficiary 100 responsible for drug costs to
3,600 in out-of-pocket expenditures - the "donut
hole" - After 3,600, catastrophic coverage kicks in with
5 coinsurance - Protections for low-income seniors
- Sale of new Medigap policies with Rx prohibited
after 2005
8Drug benefit and employer "incentives"
- Employer retiree Rx coverage subsidy 2006
- 28 of drug costs between 250 and 5,000 per
person - Will it be enough to induce employers to continue
to provide retiree benefits?
Percentage of large firms (over 200 employees)
offering retiree coverage has declined
significantly over time 66 in 1988 38 in
2003 Kaiser Family Foundation Employer Health
Benefits 2003 Annual Survey
9Part B changes
- Benefit changes
- 2005 preventive services
- physical exams for new beneficiaries
- cardiovascular and diabetic screening tests
- mammography rate increases
- disease management for chronic conditions
- Increased cost-sharing and means-testing
- 2004 deductible increases to 110
- 2005 deductible indexed to Part B spending
increases - 2007 high income beneficiaries (gt80,000) will
pay greater percentage of Part B premium - capped at 80 for incomes gt200,000
10MedicareChoice and Medicare Advantage
- 2004-2006 1.6 billion in rate increases to
health plans to stay in or get back into managed
Medicare - March 1, 2004 Medicare HMO rates will climb an
average of 10.6 - 2006 Medicare Advantage
- expands existing program to include PPOs
- competitive bidding by region
- 12 billion "stabilization fund" for private
insurers to operate in otherwise unprofitable
markets - 2010-2016 Private Competition demonstrations
- Competition between private insurers and
traditional fee-for-service Medicare - 6 regions (TBD) with 25 of the population in
private Medicare plans -
11Implications for physicians
- If enrollment shifts from FFS to managed care...
- Need to reevaluate participation in managed care
plans to maintain access to patients - Expect increased negotiating leverage by health
plans, and pressure on payment rates across all
products
- How Medicare HMO plans will spend the money
- Boost provider payments (Plans representing 75
of Medicare HMO enrollees) - Lower monthly premiums (Plans representing 93 of
enrollees) - New or enhanced benefits (Plans representing 60
of enrollees) - AAHP-HIAA survey January 2004
12But will beneficiaries enroll in MA?
- Only 4.5 million (11) enrolled today, down from
6.3 million (17) in 1999 - Considerations
- Increased Part B deductibles and premium
contributions - No new Medigap policies with prescription drug
coverage after 2005 - Richer drug benefits - no "donut hole"
- Part D late-enrollment penalty
- MC pullouts left many seniors wary of joining
private plans - PPOs may be more attractive, and serve previously
unserved markets
The Bush Administration expects 32 of Medicare
beneficiaries to enroll in MA by 2013 The CBO
estimated 9 would enroll
13Price "reform" for physician-administered drugs
- 2004 reduce payment to 85 of AWP
- maintain some categories at 95 of AWP
- cut rates further for drugs found to be
"extremely overpriced" in 2004 - 2004-5 transitional payment increase for drug
administration - 32 increase in 2004 and 3 in 2005
- 2005 Average Sales Price (ASP) 6
- Expect significant drop!
- 2006 "competitive acquisition" model -
physicians acquire drugs from third party - as yet undefined
14Impact on physician practices?
- Practice expense increases unlikely to offset
decreases
- US Oncology
- Houston-based practice management company
- 850 physicians, 450 sites, 30 states
- Medicare accounts for 38 of revenue for
affiliated physicians - Estimates 2 drop in net revenue and 30 drop in
net income in 2005 - Modern Physician Stat
- 2/9/04
15Physician fee schedule - good news/bad news
- Blocks the scheduled 4.5 reduction in RBRVS for
2004 - Ensures 1.5 increase in 2004 and 2005
- Floor of the work GPCI brought to 1.0 for
2004-2006 - all doctors paid at least 100 of the national
average for work units - "win" for rural area providers
- Increased practice expense RVUs for drug
administration - Technical changes to the SGR - 10 year rolling
average of GDP instead of single year - BUT does not fix the underlying update formula
16Payment formula and The Cliff
- DIMA Sets minimum 1.5 increases in 2004 and 2005
- Rural bonuses and new benefits will also be
included in the physician spending - But that extra spending will have to be recouped
in 2006 and beyond - Unless the payment formula is revised or
eliminated, physicians can expect a sharp
reduction in payment --- a.k.a. - THE CLIFF!
17How we got here
- 1997 SGR - Sustainable Growth Rate formula
- Congress seeking to rein in double-digit Medicare
spending growth - Devised complex formula that relied on estimates
of spending growth to establish a yearly spending
target - If estimates hit their mark, the target would
rise at the same rate as the Gross Domestic
Product - If estimates miss, or if spending for physician
services exceeds the target, the formula makes a
correction in the next update - Both bad estimates and higher spending did happen
- 2002 - 5.4 cut
- 2003 - 4.4 cut planned, averted by Congressional
action - 2004 - 4.5 cut planned, again averted by Congress
18MedPAC's recommendation
- At its January meeting, the Medicare Payment
Advisory Commission (MedPAC) has recommended that
Congress approve a 2.5 percent payment increase
for physician services in 2005 - Currently, physicians are scheduled to receive no
less than a 1.5 percent update in 2005. - The recommendations would maintain current
beneficiary access to physician care and current
physician supply for Medicare beneficiaries,
MedPAC contends
19Solutions?
- Drop the SGR formula and revert to an annual
update based on the change in physician costs - MedPAC recommended scrapping the formula in 2002
- Redefine the SGR based on other than GDP
- GDP measures growth in the overall economy
- does not consider Medicare population
demographics, technology, or changes in the
practice of medicine - MedPAC's annual recommendations consider whether
current level of pay is adequate and estimates
how much costs will increase
"The medical needs of our Medicare patients do
not wane when the economy slows." Donald J.
Palmisano, M.D. President, American Medical
Association
20What should we do?
- Reconsider participation annually - both managed
Medicare and fee-for-service - Maintain relationships with MCOs to assure
patient access - Prepare for increased beneficiary responsibility
and collection issues - Monitor commercial insurer contracts tied to
RBRVS - Specialists in particular - monitor "competitive
bidding" arrangements for drugs as they are
defined - Lobby for equitable changes to SGR and drug
pricing
21What ELSE should we do?
- As a citizen
- Think beyond the payment issues
- How do you believe social programs should be
structured and funded? - Support your vision through the political
process!
22- QUESTIONS?
- COMMENTS?
- THANK YOU!
- Elizabeth Simpkin
- (773) 736-5146
- elizabethsimpkin_at_msn.com
23Elizabeth Simpkin
- Elizabeth Simpkin is President and a founder of
The Lowell Group, Inc. The Lowell Group provides
expert managed care strategy and performance
improvement assistance to physician
organizations, hospitals, integrated delivery
systems, health plans, and managed care
organizations. Ms. Simpkin has more than 15
years experience in healthcare, including
extensive experience in managed care contracting
and operations. Ms. Simpkin has particular
expertise in strategic planning, development, and
business operations for provider organizations - Prior to forming The Lowell Group, Ms. Simpkin
was a senior consultant and project manager in
the Chicago office of Towers Perrin. Previously,
Ms. Simpkin spent six years with Blue Cross Blue
Shield of Illinois, where she held management
positions in traditional, PPO and HMO product
lines. Her responsibilities included provider
contracting and reimbursement, provider
relations, and network operations in metropolitan
Chicago and throughout Illinois. - Ms. Simpkin has a Masters degree in Healthcare
Economics from Arizona State University. She is
an active member of the Healthcare Financial
Management Association and is a frequent author
and speaker on managed care issues.