Title: CLIENT EXIT SURVEY 2
1CLIENT EXIT SURVEY 2
PRESENTATION FOR
2RATIONALE
FOR MDF KAMURJ DROP-OUT MONITORING
3DROP OUT MONITORING WHAT FOR?
- Forecasting business planning!
- Appraising institutional performance
- Seasonality!!! - analyses magnitude of desertion
fluctuates over a period of one year. - Learn about quality of service (attributes under
all Ps) in order to respond in a timely manner
to changes in clients preferences and needs. Not
waiting for a disaster. - Learn about the needs of these groups that leave
more frequently (or those that are core target
clientele) adjust the services to their needs. - In general product refinement and new product
development - It is linked to competition surviving
(long-term!) strategy. Those MFIs that will build
loyal client base will survive on the Armenian
market. - Additional role can be as direct marketing tool
encouraging people to come back informing them
about new developments.
4RESULTS
5METHODOLOGY
6WHAT CHALLENGES YOU ENCOUNTERED DURING DATA
COLLECTION?
- Preparation
- Interviewing
- Field staff attitude
- Costs
- Difficult questions
- Coding
- Branch manager supervision
- Data input
7SAMPLE CHARACTERISTIC
8DROPOUT PROFILE
28 - mixed reasons
- Dropout profiles are created using two variables
- Two most important reasons (a4) for dropout
aggregated into one variable with 4 categories
MDF Kamurj related reasons, external reasons
only, client forced out (see next section for
details).
N213
- Judgment of interviewer what will be (is) a
probable behavior of dropouts based on main
reason for dropout, her current participation in
financial market and intent to take a loan.
N207
9REASONS vs. BRANCH AND CYCLE
N213
10PROBABLE BEHAVIOUR vs. BRANCH AND CYCLE
N207
11MAIN REASONS vs. PROBABLE BEHAVIOUR
N203
12MAIN REASONS vs. INTENT TO TAKE THE NEXT LOAN
N203
13MAIN REASONS vs. BEHAVIOUR
N207
- Given the new subjective breakdown there are 5
main dropout profiles/categories (that represent
93 of all dropouts) - voluntary satisfied lost due to external reasons
30 - sleepers (both voluntary satisfied and
dissatisfied not using any other credit services
planning to come back) 41 - voluntary dissatisfied eager to return if
services are improved 4 - voluntary dissatisfied lost to competition 3
- forced out 15.
14CHARACTERISTIC OF PROFILES
Fisher test, at the significance level 0,1
15MAIN REASONS vs. BEHAVIOUR
N207
- Given the probable behaviour and main reasons
there are 5 main dropout profiles/categories
(that represent 85 of all dropouts) - voluntary satisfied lost due to external reasons
17 - sleepers (both voluntary satisfied and
dissatisfied not using any other credit services
planning to come back) 38 - voluntary dissatisfied eager to return if
services are improved 9 - voluntary dissatisfied lost to competition 4
- forced out 15.
16PROFILE vs. BRANCH
17CHARACTERISTIC OF PROFILES
Fisher test, at the significance level 0,1
18PROFILE vs. BRANCH
19MOST FREQUENTLY CITED REASONS
N214
Answers do not sum up to 100, because there was
multiple answer possible
20MOST FREQUENTLY CITED REASONS BY BRANCH
N214
Answers do not sum up to 100, because there was
multiple answer possible
21REASONS FOR DROPOUTFORCED OUT CLIENTS
N218
22FINANCIAL SERVICES USED
N42, using other financial services
N219
23FINANCIAL SERVICES PROVIDERS USED
19 - uses other sources
Reasons for choosing other MCOs IR Loan size RPM
frequency
n46, using other providers of financial services
24OTHER FINANCIAL SERVICES USED GROUP
CHARACTERISTIC
Fisher test, at the significance level 0,1
25INTENT TO TAKE ANOTHER LOAN IN MDF KAMURJ
N219
26CLIENTS SUGGESTIONS
- Declining interest rate 37 people
- New product 34 people. Particularly, individual
loan was stressed. - RPM schedule (not so often) 15 people
- No reserve fund 7 people
- Loan size increase 6 people
27MAIN FINDINGS
- Sleepers stand for the biggest group among drop
outs - Sleepers seem to be poorer group of clients
- The second biggest group are voluntary satisfied
lost due to external reasons - The latter group seems to be richer ones
- Analyzing dislikes and advantages of competition
the conclusion is drawn that MDF Kamurj
weaknesses are interest rate, repayment
frequency and loan size - Evidently, some people outgrow out off the
guarantee system and need individual loans
28REASONS APPOINTED BY LOAN PROMOTERS
N196
15
2
20
12
47
6
29DROPOUT PROFILE COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS WAVE
30DROPOUT PROFILE COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS WAVE
31???
- Any operational or strategic implications?
- What are benefits of the dropout monitoring for
MDF Kamurj? - What are the costs?
- Is it worth doing it?
- Any ideas how to improve it?