Title: Compensation and Rewards
1Compensation and Rewards
- Business 158
- Spring Semester 2007
- Tim Brown
Session 13
2Agenda
- Guest Speaker (HR Mgr Perspective)
- BREAK
- SOTE Administration
- QUIZ (Take, Grade, Discuss)
- Lecture Performance Appraisal and Merit Increase
Delivery
3Topics (Chapter 11)
- Role of Performance Appraisals in Pay Decisions
- Common Errors in Appraising Performance
- Better Understanding and Measuring Performance
- Performance Evaluation Process
- EEO and Performance Evaluation
- Tying Pay to Subjectively Appraised Performance
- Merit Increase Delivery Tool Merit Matrix Grid
- Promotions as a Pay-for-Performance Tool
4Nature of Performance Appraisals
You cant manage what you dont
understand. You dont understand what you dont
measure. What gets measured gets done. What gets
measured gets rewarded.
5Role of Performance Appraisal
- Control mechanism for feedback
- Allows employee progress to be assessed
- Ensures strategy-consistent behavior
- Reinforces values of organization
- Ensures alignment of individual performance and
behavior to organization and work systems
6Purposes of Performance Appraisal
- Evaluation
- Performance measurement
- Compensation decision-basis
- Motivation
- EMPHASIS Past
- Development
- Management development
- Identification of Potential
- General feedback
- Human resource planning
- Communication vehicle
- Performance improvement
- EMPHASIS Future
7Common Errors in Appraisal Process
Halo error
Leniency error
Horn error
Severity error
First impression error
Central tendency error
Clone error
Recency error
Spillover error
Which is worst?
8Factors Related to Inaccurate Appraisal
1
Guilt
2
Embarrassment about giving praise
3
Taking things for granted
4
Not noticing
5
Halo effect
6
Dislike of confrontation
7
Spending too little time on preparation of
appraisal
9Strategies to Better Understandand Measure Job
Performance
10Strategy to Better Understandand Measure Job
Performance
Improve Appraisal Formats
11Categories of Appraisal Formats
Ranking - Rater compares employees against each
other
Categories
Rating - Rater evaluates employees on some
absolute standard (measured on a continuum scale)
Essay - Rater answers open-ended questions in
essay form describing employee performance
12Ranking Formats
- Straight ranking
- Alternation ranking
- Paired-comparison ranking
13Rating Formats
- Two common elements
- Raters evaluate employees on against standard
- Each standard is measured on a scale -performance
variation is described along a continuum - Types of descriptors
- Behaviors (competencies)
- Outcomes (results)
14Strategy to Better Understandand Measure Job
Performance
Select the Right Raters
15Old-School view
- Manager writes evaluation
- Employee listens to managers perspective
- Employee comments not highly valued, could be
damaging to future aspirations
16Enlightened view
- Manager and Employee agree on SMART objectives
- Specific
- Measurable
- Achievable
- Realistic
- Time-bound
- Employee and Manager both contribute their views
on how employee performed
17Progressive view
- 360 degree review process considers the input of
the manager and the employee but also peers,
subordinates and customers
18Select the Right Raters
Supervisors
Peers
Self
Vendors
Subordinates
Customers
19Strategy to Better Understandand Measure Job
Performance
20The Rating Process
- Rater observes behavior of a ratee
- Rater encodes ratee behavior
- Rater stores information in memory
- When it is time to evaluate a ratee, rater
- Reviews performance dimensions and
- Retrieves stored observations to determine
relevance to performance dimensions - Information is reconsidered and integrated with
other available information as rater decides on
final ratings
21Understand Why Raters Make Mistakes
Errors in rating process
Errors in observation (attention)
Errors in storage and recall
Errors in actual evaluation
22Training Raters to Rate More Accurately
- Rater-error training
- Goal is to reduce psychometric errors by
familiarizing raters with their existence - Performance dimension training
- Exposes supervisors toperformance dimensions
used - Performance-standard training
- Provides raters with a standard orframe of
reference for making appraisal
23Ways to Improve Rater Training
- Straightforward lecturing to ratees is
ineffective - Individualized or small group discussions are
more effective (role play) - When discussions are combined with extensive
practice and feedback, rating accuracy improves - Longer training programs are generally more
successful than shorter programs - Performance-dimension and performance-standard
training are more effective than rater-error
training - Success results from efforts to reduce halo
errors and improve accuracy
24Putting it All TogetherThe Performance
Evaluation Process
Key elements making for a good outcome
1
Need a sound basis for establishing performance
appraisal dimensions and scales associated with
each dimension
2
Need to involve employees in every stage of
developing performance dimensions and building
scales
3
Need to ensure raters are trained in use of
appraisal system and that all employees
understand how system operates
4
Need to ensure raters are motivated to rate
accurately
5
Raters should maintain a diary of employee
performance
6
Raters should attempt a performance diagnosis to
determine if performance problems exist
7
Appraisal process should follow guidelines in
Exhibit 11.11
25Tips on Appraising Performance
1
Establish clear sense of direction
2
Provide opportunity for employees to participate
in setting goals and standards for performance
3
Provide prompt, honest, and meaningful feedback
4
Allow for immediate and sincere reinforcement
5
Provide coaching and suggestions for improvement
6
Provide fair and respectful treatment
7
Allow an opportunity for employees to understand
and influence decisions which effect them
26EEO and Performance Evaluation
Key Issues Establishing a Performance Appraisal
System
27Tying Pay to SubjectivelyAppraised Performance
Central issue involving merit pay
28Pay Increase Guidelines withLow Motivational
Impact
- Provide equal increases to all employees
regardless of performance - General increase
- Cost-of-living adjustments
- Pay increases based on a preset progression
pattern based on seniority
29Pay Increase Guidelines that have greater
motivational impact
- Pay increases tied to actual performance
- Clear link between how your boss rated you and
how you did (objective) - Employee buys into the process and system
30Performance-based Guidelines
Does this difference in pay increase make
you want to work as hard as needed to raise your
rating score?
31Designing Merit Guidelines
Four Questions . . .
1
What should the poorest performer be paid as an
increase?
2
How much should average performers be paid as an
increase?
3
How much should top performers be paid?
4
What should be the size of the percentage
increase differential between different levels of
performance?
32Merit Pay Grid
- Merit grids combine three variables
- Level of performance
- Distribution of employees within pay ranges
- Overall merit budget increase percentage
33Sample (Generous) Merit Pay Grid
34Sample (Tight) Merit Pay Grid
35Promotional Increases as aPay-for-Performance
Tool
- Promotion should be accompanied by a salary
increase - 8 to 12 - Characteristics of promotional pay increases
- Size of increment is approximately double a
normal merit increase - Represent a reward to employees for commitment
and exemplary performance
36Exceptions Happen
- Must have some money to make adjustments
- Bring employees to range minimum
- Adjust for new college grad compression
- Recognize market movement in key roles
- Fix mistakes in starting rate
37Reminder
- Merit increases need to be meaningful in size
- Consistent with company goals/objectives culture
and philosophy - Can not be counted on as a panacea
- Work for about 12 weeks before and 6 weeks after
- If that.
38The Performance Management Process
Establish Expectations
Coaching and Development
Performance Management - Continuous process
where employees and managers work together
Feedback
Review
Rewards and Recognition