Where We Go Wrong In Vessel Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Where We Go Wrong In Vessel Design

Description:

30% of large property damage losses are caused by failures in tanks, process ... Cracked 403 / 1087. Other - 298 / 1087. Leakage 163 / 1087. Rupture 158 / 1087 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: dickha
Category:
Tags: cracked | design | vessel | wrong

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Where We Go Wrong In Vessel Design


1
Where We Go Wrong In Vessel Design
  • Dick Hawrelak
  • Presented to ES-317Y in 1999 at UWO

2
Introduction
  • 30 of large property damage losses are caused by
    failures in tanks, process drums and marine
    vessels.
  • Average Trended Loss was 40.5MM for tanks alone.

3
1984 U.S. National OSHA Record
  • 6486 accidents.
  • 516 injuries.
  • 90 deaths.

4
OSHA Record Includes
  • Power Boilers
  • Water Boilers and Steel Tanks
  • Cast Iron Boilers
  • Pressure Vessels (poorest record)

5
Pressure Vessel Record
  • 1310 / 6486 accidents
  • 437 / 516 injuries
  • 73 / 90 deaths

6
Press Vessel Components
  • Shell
  • Head
  • Attachements
  • Piping
  • Safety Valves
  • Misc

7
PV Failure Causes
  • Operator error or poor maintenance 149 / 933
  • Faulty Design 144 / 933
  • Corrosion or erosion 132 / 933
  • Pressure control failure 41 / 933
  • Other 420 / 933

8
PV Failure Types
  • Cracked 403 / 1087
  • Other - 298 / 1087
  • Leakage 163 / 1087
  • Rupture 158 / 1087
  • Explosion 22 / 1087
  • Collapsed Inward 15 / 1087

9
Obtain Data Analyze
  • Search OSHA records On Internet - Google
  • Extract records
  • Create Excel Database
  • Sort and Filter data
  • Analyze Data

10
Personal Experiences
  • Based on 33 Years of Chemical Plant Design at Dow.

11
Incomplete Mass Balances
  • Normal mass balance.
  • Start-up, shut down or upset.
  • Recycle conditions.
  • Off-loading situations unplanned.

12
Residence or Hold-up Time
  • Inventory logistics not well defined.
  • Flammable or toxic inventories too high.

13
Containment
  • Dyke dimensions do not meet codes.
  • Drainage does not follow NFPA 15.
  • Catastrophic failure overwhelms dyke walls.

14
Materials Of Construction
  • Not suitable for corrosive fluid at high
    temperature.
  • Not suitable for low temperature excursions.

15
Quantum Explosion - 7 June 89
  • A-515-70 grade CS brittle failure of heat
    exchanger shell.
  • Start-up, inlet flange leak, isolated exchanger
    and depressured to flare.
  • 30 minutes to failure. Two fatalities, seven
    serious burns, major damage to ethylene plant.

16
Nozzles
  • Level control nozzles in wrong location.
  • Nozzles too small creating impingement on far
    wall.
  • PSV nozzles not suitable for thrust.

17
Visit U.S. EPA CEPP Web Site
  • Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention
    Office web site at www.epa.gov/ceppo/acc-his.html
  • Check Rupture Hazard of Pressure Vessels.
  • Check Catastrophic Failure of Storage Tanks.

18
Ammonia Storage Tank Modification
  • Oil and Gas Journal, Dec 26, 1998
  • Pressure storage in spheres
  • Removes bottom unloading lines.
  • Converts to overhead siphon system.
  • Excellent article on 4 process design options.

19
Typical Pressure Vessel
20
KO Pot Design
21
Internals
  • Impingement details not well designed.
  • Pump-out sumps act as dirt trap.
  • KO Pot internals not designed properly.

22
Design Pressure
  • Design Pressure not suitable for upset conditions.

23
Reactive Chemicals
  • PIDs must be examined for reactive chemical
    possibilities.

24
Low Pressure API Tanks
  • Very easy to bulge or suck-in resulting in loss
    of containment.
  • PSV, pad de-pad settings very close.
  • Floating roof explosion at Suncor in Sarnia. Roof
    hangs up on pump-out, air sucked into vapor
    phase, lightning ignites flammable vapor.

25
Breathing.
  • Pumping and temperature change breathing not
    allowed for in combination.
  • High breathing losses a cost and an environmental
    problem - Benzene tank.

26
Vapor Recovery Options
  • Not well understood.
  • See BLOSS program for design options.

27
Flammable Storage Area
  • EO storage bunkers located 1 mile from ISBL.
  • 3 independent means of checking quantity to
    prevent overfilling (dual LC, weigh scale flow
    rate x time).
  • Refrigeration to prevent polymerization, chart
    temperature.
  • Dump contents to pond if runaway reaction takes
    place.

28
EO Storage
29
Toxic Storage
30
Possible Exam Questions
  • What are three independent methods for preventing
    overfilling of a storage vessel.
  • If a storage product can generate heat by
    polymerization at ambient temperatures, what
    safety measures should be considered?
  • What are the main problems with fixed roof, low
    pressure API type storage vessels?

31
Exam Questions Contd
  • What is one of the main problems with an API,
    floating roof storage tank in flammable service?
  • What are the safety measures that should be taken
    for a large chlorine storage sphere to prevent a
    toxic gas release?

32
Summary
  • This short list is indicative of some of the
    problems caused by poor engineering discipline in
    vessel design.
  • Recommend you obtain a copy of the Chemical Plant
    Design programs and follow the procedures built
    into the vessel design spreadsheets.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com