Economic Incentives for Environmental Sustainability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Economic Incentives for Environmental Sustainability

Description:

One, people may make choices that conserve the environment because society ... How did we create an economic system that confuses capital liquidation with income? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:79
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: usrp
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Economic Incentives for Environmental Sustainability


1
Economic Incentives for Environmental
Sustainability
  • 29 April 2005

2
Getting People to do the Right Thing
  • We can classify the ways of persuading people to
    conserve the natural environment in three
    categories. One, people may make choices that
    conserve the environment because society
    instructs them to do so and will penalize them if
    they disobey. This is the regulatory approach,
    the one most widely used to date. Two, people may
    make choices that conserve the environment
    because they believe as a matter of principle
    that this is how they should act it is
    consistent with their views on what matters in
    life and how one should run ones life.
    Environmental activists are usually in this
    category. (continued )

3
Getting People to do the Right Thing
  • Three, people may choose environmentally
    friendly strategies because these options are in
    their economic self-interest. The prices they
    face fully reflect the social costs of their
    actions, and they are naturally led by the
    invisible hand of the market to make the right
    choices. (Geoffrey Heal, Nature and the
    Marketplace, 2000)
  • HOWEVER, people now know the price of everything
    but the TRUE COST of nothing. Price is what the
    person pays. Cost is what society pays, here,
    now, elsewhere, and into the future. A pesticide
    may sell for thirty-five dollars a gallon, but
    what does it cost society as it makes its way
    into wells, rivers, and bloodstreams? (Hawken,
    Lovins, and Lovins, 1999)

4
Imagine two people talking in 1890. Lets
create an industry that will employ millions of
people, sell a copy of its product every two
seconds, and provide personal mobility to nearly
all Americans. However, it will also do the
following
  • Pave an area equal to all the arable land in
    Ohio, Indiana, and Pennsylvania, requiring
    maintenance costs of 200 million/day.
  • Maim or injure 250 million people, and kill more
    Americans than have died in all wars in the
    countrys history.
  • Combust 8 million barrels of oil every day,
    making the U.S. increasingly dependent on foreign
    oil at a cost of over 100 billion a year, and
    requiring the U.S. to maintain a substantial
    military presence in one of the most hostile and
    volatile regions of the world.
  • Kill a million wild animals per week, from deer
    and elk to birds, frogs, and opossums, plus tens
    of thousands of domestic pets.
  • Make the air so unbreathable in metropolitan
    areas that children and the elderly should not
    venture outside on certain days.
  • Cause spectacular increases in asthma, emphysema,
    heart disease and bronchial infections.
  • Create 7 billion pounds of unrecycled scrap and
    waste every year.

5
The Most Heavily Subsidized Industries in America
  • Automobiles / Oil / Energy 464 billion/year in
    corporate welfare. New energy bill includes
    over 80 billion in subsidies to oil, coal and
    gas industries at a time of record high prices
    and profits.
  • Mining / Mineral Extraction because of
    provisions in the 1872 Mining Act, 16 billion in
    minerals from public lands was sold to mining
    companies in 1996 for 19, 190 in royalties.
    Taxpayers then have to pay millions in clean-up
    costs after mines are abandoned.
  • Forest Products the Forest Service regularly
    spends more to build and maintain roads in the
    national forest than they take in through timber
    sales.
  • Agriculture subsidies of 50 billion/year 84
    of subsidies go to farmers with annual incomes
    over 100,000/year 70 of subsidies go to the
    richest 10 of farmers.

6
Correcting Market Distortions Or, How to Invest
in Natural Capital
  • 1. Reduce or eliminate wasteful subsidies that
    lead to natural capital depletion
    http//www.greenscissors.org/ Since 1994, the
    Green Scissors Campaign, led by Friends of the
    Earth, Taxpayers for Common Sense and U.S. Public
    Interest Research Group, has been working with
    Congress and the Administration to end
    environmentally harmful and wasteful spending.
    Working to breach party lines, the Green Scissors
    Campaign has helped cut more than 26 billion in
    environmental wasteful programs from the federal
    budget.

7
Correcting Market Distortions Or, How to Invest
in Natural Capital
  • 2. Ecological Tax Reform taxes and subsidies
    are a form of information, and everybody in the
    world, whether rich or poor, acts on price
    information every day. Taxes make things more
    expensive, subsidies lower prices. Ecological tax
    reform would shift taxes away from labor and
    income, and toward pollution, waste, carbon fuels
    and resource exploitation, all of which are
    presently subsidized. A tax shift is not intended
    to redefine who pays the taxes but only what is
    taxed.

8
A Final Thought
  • For many, the prospect of an economic system
    based on increasing the productivity with which
    we use natural capital, eliminating the concept
    of waste, and reinvesting in the earths living
    systems and its people is so upbeat that it calls
    into question its economic viability. To answer
    that question, just reverse it and ask How is it
    that we have created an economic system that
    tells us it is cheaper to destroy the earth and
    exhaust its people than to nurture them both? Is
    it rational to have a pricing system that
    discounts the future and sells off its past? How
    did we create an economic system that confuses
    capital liquidation with income? Wasting
    resources to achieve profits is far from fair,
    wasting people to achieve higher GDP doesnt
    raise standards of living, and wasting the
    environment to achieve economic growth is neither
    economic nor growth. (Hawken, Lovins, and
    Lovins, 1999)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com