Title: CHIP Quality and Performance Monitoring
1CHIP Quality and Performance Monitoring
- Wendy J. Wolf, MD, MPH
- Senior Policy Fellow
- Health Resources and Services Administration
- Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
2Objectives
- Who are the CHIP kids?
- Quality Issues
- What is it?
- Why is it important?
- Attributes of quality medical care
- Review the quality/performance measures proposed
for CHIP - Problems in quality monitoring for child health
- Strategies to promote quality care
3Who are CHIP children?What do we know about
their health needs and utilization?
4Who are the uninsured?
- Uninsured children are more likely to
- Be teenagers (ages 13-17)
- Be Hispanic
- Live in single-parent families
- Have parents with little education
- Live without employed parents
- Live outside of metropolitan service areas
RM Weinick
5What Does Providing Insurance Do for Uninsured
Children?
- Study of western PA CHIP program
- Insurance enrollment improved access
- Regular source of care increased (89 to 99)
- Regular dentist (60 to 85)
- children having unmet need or delayed care
decreased from 57 to 16 - children seeing MD increased (59 to 64),
while ER visits fell (22 to 17)
6What Constitutes Quality of Health Care?
- Quality of care is the degree to which health
services for individuals and populations increase
the likelihood of desired health outcomes, and
are consistent with current professional
knowledge. - - Institute of Medicine/Lohr, 1990
- Quality of care is doing the right thing for the
right person at the right time. - - John Eisenberg, M.D., 1997
7(No Transcript)
8Nine Key Elements Defining Quality Medical Care
for Children
- Accessible
- Convenient
- Practical
- Affordable
- Continuous
- Comprehensive
- Coordinated
- ACCOUNTABLE
- Clinically Effective
- Up to date, appropriate diagnostics treatments
- Child-centered
- Includes families in decision-making
- Community-oriented
- Culturally competent
9Quality / Performance Assessment in the new Title
XXI (CHIP) programs
10Types of CHIP programs (2/22/99)Yellow
Medicaid Expansion Red Separate PlanBlue
Combination Program Gray Not submitted
11In their CHIP proposals, States will
- assure the quality and appropriateness of care,
and - Describe how performance under the plan will be
measured through objective, independently
verifiable means and compared against performance
goals in order to determine the states
performance..
12SUGGESTED PERFORMANCE INDICATORS LISTED ON
TITLE XXI APPLICATION
- 9.3.4. The extent to which outcome measures show
progress on one or more of the health problems
identified by the state. - 9.3.5 HEDIS measurement Set relevant to children
and adolescents younger than 19. - 9.3.6. Other child appropriate measurement set.
List or describe the set used. - 9.3.7. If not utilizing the entire HEDIS set,
specify which measures will be collected, such
as - Immunizations Well child care
- Adolescent well visits Satisfaction with care
- Mental Health Dental care
1348 (States DC) CHIP PLANSQUALITY/PERFORMANCE
MEASURES
- Complete HEDIS 3.0 measures selected by 17 States
(35) - Selective HEDIS 3.0 measures selected by 26
states (54) - No HEDIS measures selected by 5 states (10)
14Consumer Satisfaction
- Measure of States
- HEDIS 3.0 survey 18
- CAHPS survey 11
- (as part of HEDIS or separate)
- Other survey (unspecified) 21
- No assessment 8
- Consumer education materials 22
- Cultural competency focus 3
-
15Problems with CHIP Quality/Performance Evaluation
- Lack of good baseline data
- Inadequate data information systems for baseline,
tracking, comparisons - Lack of measurement uniformity
- No mechanism for risk adjustment
- Changing insurance status
- No accepted national standards
16Other Problems with CHIP
- Little information about provider and health care
system capacity. - Mental and behavioral health care system needs of
CHIP kids have probably been underestimated. - Access to dental care is the first problem to
solve before we focus on performance.
17Quality Issues for Childrens Health Care
Requires a Special Focus
- Children are not just little adults.
- Children are dependent.
- Care is rendered within a family context.
- Optimal health care for children goes beyond
traditional medical care.
18Other Challenges in Quality Assessment for
Children
- Children are healthy with a low incidence and
prevalence of disease - Large part of care is preventive
- Hard to assess long term outcomes
- Limited research base
- Indicators have to be age-appropriate and
developmentally appropriate - Family focus
19QUALITY ISSUES
- What gets measured, gets done,
- However, measurement alone
- does not insure quality.
20Quality Varies Variations in Immunization Rates
Selected Regions
Selected Plans
SOURCE NCQA, HEDIS data, 1996
21Assessing the national impact of CHIP
- State-specific measures
- Aggregate State measures
- National data sets
22State-specific measures
- Know whats in your States quality/performance
plan - Monitor performance in conjunction with other
State-specific measurement sets - Title V performance measures
- State National Immunization Survey
- Vital Statistics
- Urban Institute Study in 13 States
23Aggregate State Measures
- Aggregate State reporting data can
- be used to assess the national
- impact of CHIP for those aspects
- of care that have been
- comparably measured
24National data sets that can provide information
about CHIP/Medicaid
- CPS (Census) - assess changes in
insurance/uninsured status but is not a health
care questionnaire. - NHIS (NCHS/CDC) and MEPS (AHCPR) - assess income,
insurance status, usual source of care, type of
health care contact, health status, immunizations - NIS (CDC) - can assess immunization status for
different income groups but does not have
insurance information
25What role can MCHB States play in improving
quality?
- Know what services are
- being purchased in contracts.
- Encourage high quality through purchasing
strategies - Provide high quality services
- Measure the quality of care
- Inform consumers
- Protect consumers