Intelligent Agents Conference Notes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Intelligent Agents Conference Notes

Description:

Agent Based Computing and the Open Agent Architecture (Cheyer & Moran, SRI) ... 'chunky'- stick w/ clump of topic, then move on to something else (e.g., paris, music) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:16
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: travis92
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intelligent Agents Conference Notes


1
Intelligent AgentsConference Notes
  • ISE Workshop at NASA
  • 16/17-SEP-1998

2
Topics
  • 1. Information Retrieval
  • Why Surf Alone? (Lieberman, MIT)
  • Knowledge Representation (Hendler, UMD)
  • 2. Agent Interaction
  • Conversational Agents (Finin, UMD)
  • Conscious Agents (Franklin, U.Memphis)

3
  • 3. Organization
  • Coordinating Intelligent Agents (Decker, UDE)
  • Agent Based Computing and the Open Agent
    Architecture (Cheyer Moran, SRI)
  • 4. Practical Engineering Applications
  • Role of Intelligent Agents in Advanced
    Information Systems (Kerschberg, GMU)
  • Multiagent Systems, WWW, and Networked Scientific
    Computing (Joshi, UMD)

4
  • 5. Design Using Agents
  • Improving Design w/ Agents (Brown, Worcester
    Tech)
  • Decentralized Decision Making in Concurrent
    Engineering (Birmingham, UMI)
  • Standards Activity in Agent Based Learning and
    Visual Consultation for Manufacturing (Aparicia,
    IBM)
  • 6. Multiagent Programming Future
  • Multiagent Oriented Programming (Huhns, USC)
  • Future Directions (general discussion)

5
Topic 1.1Why Surf Alone? Reconnaisance
AgentsHenry Lieberman, MIT
6
Two Modes of Info Retrieval
  • Browsing
  • exploring, can follow tangents, vague ideas
  • fun but easy to get lost
  • chunky- stick w/ clump of topic, then move on
    to something else (e.g., paris, music)
  • Searching
  • precisely targetted retrieval
  • computers can search pre-indexed docs quickly
  • what if you don't want to search for exactly
    something for which you know a keyword?

7
Why not something in between?
  • People have Interests
  • sometimes expressed as keywords, sometimes not
  • can recognize information in which they have an
    interest sometimes better than a computer
  • IR should involve cooperation between an
    intelligent agent and the user
  • the user is better at deciding what has value to
    him
  • the computer is better at searching prexisting
    indexes

8
  • Evaluation Function
  • provides a mapping between the users idea of
    merit and computers idea of merit
  • an agent can learn an evaluation function by
    observing the users browsing behavior

9
Depth vs. Breadth First Searching
  • Depth First
  • traditional search engines used by Netscape, etc.
  • presents options and the user picks one path to
    follow
  • not optimal since the engine returns one batch of
    results per query there are no more chances
  • Breadth First
  • searching in parallel
  • an agent can perform this type of search
  • every time the user goes from one page to
    another, the agent can refocus its breadth first
    search

10
Analyzable Qualities ofUsers Browsing Behavior
  • Every click is an expression of interest
  • content keywords of documents browsed
  • sequence of browsing operations
  • Other expressions of interest
  • Agents would help in
  • maintaining areas of interest
  • finding areas of dual interests (e.g. french jazz
    concert)
  • email
  • bookmarks, links to page
  • dwell time
  • downloads

11
Lets Browse
  • Multiple users browsing together, agent
  • takes into account interests of passive
    participants
  • can represent interests for each user (from home
    pages)
  • dynamically performs freq analysis to to discover
    areas of common (intersecting) interest
  • hey, I didn't know you played tennis -
    icebreaker
  • interesting result - had to keep more terms per
    user than in single user case (had to dip lower
    into minor personal interests in order to find
    common interests)

12
LETIZIA
  • What is it?
  • Liebermans example of a reconnaisance agent
  • an advance scout for web browsing
  • a channel surfing interface
  • What does it do?
  • provides temporal sampling of different info
    sources
  • observes users browsing behavior
  • infers users interests from its observations

13
LETIZIA, notes...
  • works w/ interactive interface (unmodified
    netscape), doesn't replace
  • doesn't take any extra effort to communicate to
    agent
  • anticipates user's interests
  • explores links from home page to see if anything
    interesting
  • agent looks through links, determines which are
    most interesting
  • agent also looks at results from search engine
  • also uses netscape history to keep track
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com