Planning rice breeding programs for impact - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Planning rice breeding programs for impact

Description:

Models for predicting correlated response to selection will be presented ... for short-season and long-season sites in the eastern Indian shuttle network OYT ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: GAt48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Planning rice breeding programs for impact


1
Planning rice breeding programs
for impact
  • Correlated response to selection

2
Introduction
Question Why are breeders concerned with genetic
correlations?
  • undesired changes in traits that are important
    but that are not under direct selection
  • May be more effective to conduct indirect
    selection for a low-H trait by selecting for a
    correlated high-H trait
  • Selection in SE for performance in TPE is a form
    of indirect selection. Response in the TPE to
    selection in the SE is a correlated response

3
Learning objectives
  • Genetic and env. correlations will be defined for
    traits measured on the same plot, and an
    estimation method presented
  • Genetic and environmental correlations will be
    defined for traits measured in different
    environments, and an estimation method presented
  • Models for predicting correlated response to
    selection will be presented
  • ?Examples of use of correlated response methods
    to answer practical breeding questions

4
Basic statistics
  • The product-moment correlation
  • For 2 variables, A and B, the product-moment
    correlation is
  • r sAB/( sA sB) 9.1
  •  
  • The variance of a sum
  •  If Y A B, then
  • s2Y s2A s2B 2 sAB 9.2

5
Genetic covariances and correlations for traits
measured on the same plot
  • For 2 traits, A and B, measured on the same plot
  • YA mA GA eA
  • YB mB GB eB
  •   
  • sG(AB)
  • rG(AB)
  • v (s2G(A) s2G(B) )

6
Genetic covariances and correlations for traits
measured on the same plot
  • For 2 traits, A and B, measured on the same plot
  • YA mA GA eA
  • YB mB GB eB
  •   
  • se(AB)
  • re(AB)
  • v (s2e(A) s2e(B) )

7
Phenotypic correlation (correlation of line
means)
sP(AB) rPAB v (s2P(A) s2P(B)
)   sG(AB) sE(AB)/r v
(s2G(A) s2E(A)/r ) v(s2G(B) s2E(B)/r )
As r increases, the phenotypic correlation
approaches the genotypic correlation!
8
1. Estimating rG for traits measured on the same
plot
Remember s2Gy s2GA s2GB 2 sGAB 9.2
Therefore, sG(AB) s2GY (s2GA s2GB
)/2 9.5
9
Estimating rG for traits measured on the same
plot
  • Method
  • Add measurements A and B for each plot, to make a
    new combined variable a new name (say Y). Poss.
    with Excel
  • Perform ANOVA on the new combined variable, then
    estimate the genetic variance component using the
    method described in Unit 8
  • Use Equation 9.5
  • sG(AB) s2GY (s2GA s2GB )/2

10
Example Calculating rG for GY HI in 40 lines
For each plot, add HI to GY ? Call new variable
GYHI
11
Example Calculating rG for GY HI in 40 lines
Do ANOVA, then calculate variance components
12
2. Estimating rG for traits measured in
different environments
Not correlated
YA mA GA eA YB mB GB eB
Correlated
Therefore, rP across environments has no
environmental covariance covP covG
13
When means for same trait are estimated in
different trials
  • ? the phenotypic covariance is due to genetic
    causes only

   sG(AB) rP(AB) v (s2P(A) s2P(B)
)
14
Estimating rG for traits measured in different
environments
SO
rG rP /v( HA x HB) 9.6
15
Example Calculating rG for short-season and
long-season sites in the eastern Indian shuttle
network OYT

rP 0.36 Hshort 0.51 Hlong 0.65 rG
0.36/(0.510.65).5
16
Question Why do we want to predict correlated
response?
  • To find out if we could make more gains by
    selecting for a correlated trait with higher H
  • To find out if selection done in our SE will
    result in gains in target environment


17
Predicting correlated response
For 2 traits, A and B, OR for same trait in 2
environments, A and B Correlated response (CR)
in A to selection for B is CRA k rG v HB
sG(A) Where k is selection intensity in
phenotypic standard deviation units

18
Any questions or comments?
19
Summary
  • rP is corr. of line means for different traits,
    or for same trait in different environments
  • rG is corr. of genotypic effects free from
    confounding with the effect of plots or pots
  • 2 main kinds of genetic correlation (corr. for 1
    trait in 2 envs versus corr. for 2 traits in 1
    env.) have to be estimated differently


20
Summary
  • Main reason to estimate rG is to predict
    correlated response
  • rG in combination with H, can be used to evaluate
    different selection strategies by predicting CR
    in the TPE to selection in different SE
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com