Title: New Trade Politics After the Doha Round
1New Trade Politics After the Doha Round
- Joost Pauwelyn
- Professor of International Law (HEID)
- Geneva, 5 December 2007
2- Havana Conference, December 1947
3- Opening of the Centre William Rappard
460 years old  operating systemÂ
- Reciprocal exchange of market access
concessions - Domestic politics lead to protectionism
- GATT/WTO enables liberalization through an
exchange of market access concessions - Producer driven (replace import with export
politics) - Merchantillistic
- Mistrust of own government (replace open with
closed politics)
5Frequency of WTO Agreements Addressed in the 79
Appellate Body Reports Circulated between
1996-2006
Source WTO Appellate Body, 2007
6Â New Trade PoliticsÂ
London, 1946
Seattle, 1999
7Â New Trade PoliticsÂ
New Delhi, 2005
Geneva, 1926
8Overview
- What has changed in last 60 years ?
- What consequences should we draw for the WTO ?
- Conclusions
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11Reduction of Tariffs on Industrial Goods1931 to
2000
Source Findlay and ORourke, 2007
12Regional Trade Agreements, 1958-2004
Annual number
Total in force
Cumulative in force
New agreements annually
13Shares in World Trade 1947
Benelux (11)
Other (12)
Brazil
Canada
USA (25)
China
France (9.5)
India
UK (25)
Source Irwin Mavroidis
14Shares in World Merchandise Trade 2006
China (9.6)
Other (40)
EU (17)
India
Japan
Mexico
Switserland (1.6)
USA (16)
Source WTO
15(No Transcript)
16FDI Inflows, Global and by Group of
Economies1980-2006 (billions of dollars)
Source UNCTAD
17What changed in 60 years ?
- CONVENTIONAL
- More members
- More trade
- Less tariffs
- More preferential agreements
- LESS CONVENTIONAL
- Country shares in world trade
- What is traded how
- International flanking policies
- Domestic forces against free trade
18Southern Democrats 1940s 2000s
John Edwards
Cordell Hull
19Consequences of these changes
- I. Is the WTO still needed ?
- II. Does trade liberalization continue to
require producer-driven  closed politics ? - III. In the future, where can the biggest gains
be made ?
20I. Is the WTO still needed ?
Market access fuel is running out
People support globalization
21The End of History ?
22The End of History ?
23The End of History ?
24A different role for the WTO after Doha
- From  engine to  stabilizer against
resurgent protectionism (DSM) - From  engine to  clearing house where
liberalization agreed to elsewhere is bound
25 Decomposing Tariff Reductions
Decomposing 20 pt. decline
Average Tariffs, 1983 and 2003
Regional
29.9
Multilateral
9.3
Unilateral
Source Martin and Ng, 2004
26A different process for the WTO after Doha
- From prisoners dilemma to assurance game
- From reciprocal concessions (mercantillism) to
do yourself a favor (welfare analysis) - From single package to variable geometry
27II. Does free trade continue to require  closed
politics ?
London, 1946
Seattle, 1999
28Â New Trade PoliticsÂ
Seattle, 1999 Hong Kong, 2005
Geneva, 1926
29Move back from  closed to  open politics
- Engage convince (rather than  cheat on )
domestic politics - Offer adjustment tailor-made policies
- From producer focus to consumer/values focus
- Support of open trade policy space  new
embedded liberalismÂ
30New  Embedded LiberalismÂ
31New  Embedded LiberalismÂ
32New  Embedded LiberalismÂ
33III. Where are the biggest gains ?
34Impacts on Real Income from Full Liberalization
of Global Merchandise Trade
Source Anderson, Martin and van der Mensbrugghe,
2005
35A failed Doha Round doesnt cost China or India
much less so for Brazil
Source Simon Evenett, 2007
36Dani Rodrik (Harvard University) How to Save
Globalization from Its Cheerleaders (July, 2007)
- Â the obstacles faced by developing countries do
not originate from inadequate access to markets
abroad or to foreign capital. The gains to be
reaped by further liberalization of markets are
meager for poor and rich countries alike it is
lack of policy space and not lack of market
access which is the real binding constraint
on a prosperous global economy .
37Conclusions
- I. The world has changed since 1947
- II. The GATT/WTO did not (or little)
- III. Reform proposals focus on insider concerns
- IV. New trade politics must adjust to outside
world - New  embedded liberalismÂ
- Open politics Policy space
- Assurance game rather than PD
- WTO as stabiliser clearing house
- Low hanging fruit is gone