Prof' john a' powell - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

Prof' john a' powell

Description:

housing and opportunity through a structural lens ... interaction between racism and patriarchy, disparities can be particularly ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: erics2
Category:
Tags: john | patriarchy | powell | prof

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Prof' john a' powell


1

The Longest Lever Philanthropy Through a
Structural Lens
  • Prof. john a. powell
  • Kirwan Institute for the Study of
  • Race Ethnicity
  • 15 October 2004

2
Overview
  • Race, Racism, Disparities and Structures
  • What is Structural Racism?
  • Globalization and Structures
  • Spatial Racism
  • housing and opportunity through a structural
    lens
  • Regionalism a structural response to
    fragmentation and segregation
  • Framing the problem, Understand the solutions
  • Maximizing our ability to create social change

3
The problem of equality is so tenacious
because, despite its virtues and attributes,
America is deeply racist and its democracy is
flawed both economically and socially justice
for Black people cannot be achieved without
radical changes in the structure of our society
exposing evils that are rooted deeply in the
whole structure of our society. It reveals
systemic rather than superficial flaws and
suggests that radical reconstruction of society
itself is the real issue to be faced Rev.
Martin Luther King, Jr.

4
Race and Racism
  • Race
  • Biological determinism vs social construction
  • Constituted through racial hierarchy
  • Race does not exist in an objective sense, it is
    created by/through social/cultural structures

5
Disparities Past Present
  • Racial disparities exist across the US and the
    world.
  • These disparities were historically established
    and reinforced through inscription in the laws
    and practices along lines of gender, race, class,
    religion, etc.
  • In the U.S. and much of the world, todays
    policies and laws are supposedly neutral, yet
    groups are still experiencing disparities (in
    some cases increasing)
  • Racial attitudes have been improving even when
    conditions have not.

6
Structural Racism
  • We have seen a move away from legal racism and
    personal prejudice to a racial hierarchy that is
    enforced through institutional/structural means.
  • Example de jure segregation ? de facto
    segregation

7
The Source of Disparities
  • How do we understand these disparities if they
    are not explained by personal discrimination or
    explicit laws and policies? When do disparities
    matter?
  • Three sources
  • Biology Much less prevalent today, but the
    common 19th century theory of racial, ethnic, and
    gender inferiority.
  • Individuals Culture Idea that individuals
    alone can (and should) rise above their
    conditions of poverty, and the idea of a
    defective culture of poverty.
  • Structures Institutions States that even
    within neutral arrangements and without racist
    actors, disparities can still exist.

8
Disparities Civil Rights Era Today
  • The typical Black family had 60 as much income
    as a white family in 1968, but only 58 as much
    in 2002.
  • Black infants are almost two-and-a-half-times as
    likely as white infants to die before age one a
    greater gap than in 1970.
  • At the slow rate that the Black-white poverty gap
    has been narrowing since 1968, it would take
    until 2152, to close.
  • African Americans had 55 cents in 1968 and only
    57 cents in 2001. At this pace, it would take
    Blacks 581 years to get the remaining 43 cents.
  • While white homeownership has jumped from 65 to
    75 since 1970, Black homeownership has only
    risen from 42 to 48. At this rate, it would
    take 1,664 years to close the homeownership gap
    about 55 generations.

Source State Of The Dream 2004 (United for a
Fair Economy)
9
Median Household incomes of racial and ethnic
groups (national)
SOURCE LEWIS MUMFORD CENTER 1990, 2000 CENSUS
10
Disparities A matrix of oppression
  • Because of the interaction between racism and
    patriarchy, disparities can be particularly
    egregious for poor women of color
  • Single Mothers Living in Concentrated Poverty
    In 2000, 49 of families in concentrated poverty
    neighborhoods consist of female headed single
    parent families. In comparison female headed
    single parent families make up only 10 of all
    families nationwide. Source Urban Institute
    and U.S. Census Bureau

11
Understanding Structural Racism
  • Theoretically neutral policies and practices can
    function in racist ways. Laws and institutions
    need not be explicitly racist in order to
    disempower communities of color they need only
    to perpetuate unequal historic conditions.
  • These policies and practices are not neutral
    however, and as a result the burdens are
    distributed unevenly.
  • We are increasingly moving toward racial
    hierarchy without racist actors.

12
Structural Racism (SR) Approach
  • The SR approach proposes evaluating the fairness
    of structures or institutional arrangements by
    how they function, and in their relationships
    with other structures/institutions.
  • Look at results, not necessarily intentions
  • How do they affect human agency?

13
Globalization
  • Shifting the economic unit increasingly it is
    regions (city-states) that are engaged with
    other regions
  • need to be careful not to frame the debate in
    terms of scarcity and a winner-loser competition
    either intra- or inter-regionally

14
Globalization
  • Technology and economic trends are creating a
    more integrated, dynamic and interconnected world
    and a "global economy."
  • Economic growth without social and cultural
    justice cannot be our idea of development.
  • Development should be measured in terms of the
    quality of human life.

15
Globalization
  • Amartya Sen notes that we must also be careful
    not to give exclusive attention to means (ie
    income, wealth, etc) but to the ends desired and
    the capabilities required to pursue those ends.
  • When we look at things within our framework of
    structures and opportunities, we can focus on
    those actions that maximize access to opportunity.

16
Spatial Racism Using a Structural Racism
approach to understand segregation its causes
and effects
Space is how race plays out in American
society-and the key to solving inequities in
housing, transportation, education, and health
careSprawl is the new face of Jim
Crow. john powell
17
Spatial Racism The Civil Rights Agenda for the
21st Century
  • The government plays a central role in the
    arrangement of space and opportunities.
  • Not neutral or natural
  • Social and racial inequities are geographically
    inscribed
  • There is a polarization between the rich and the
    poor that is directly related to the areas in
    which they live.

18
Spatial Racism Not Natural or Neutral
  • Civil Rights movement and the urbanization of
    people of color occurred in tandem during
    post-WWII America.
  • While very real gains were being made against
    blatant exclusionary practices and a culture of
    discrimination, groundwork was being laid for
    persistent structural racism.
  • Blacks moving to cities for opportunities, while
    opportunities leave the cities to the suburbs
  • Same pattern beginning to repeat in first-ring
    suburbs today
  • Latino/as also dealing with suburbanization

19
Segregation Today
  • Persists at very high levels for
    African-Americans
  • At 65 (75 in many major metropolitan areas)
  • Improving at an extremely slow pace
  • Worst in Northern cities
  • Detroit, Milwaukee, New York, Chicago
  • Southern cities more likely to be organized on
    county level

20
Sprawl in the United States
Suburban population
  • Suburban population doubled
  • between 1950 and 1970

1950
1970
Suburbs
Central Cities
  • By 2000 the suburbs
  • contained over 2/3 of the
  • metropolitan population
  • Only 1/3 remained in the
  • central cities

21
  • By pushing good jobs, stable housing, and
    educational opportunities further into the
    suburbs, sprawl creates areas of the central city
    that are locked off from access to meaningful
    opportunities.

22
Fragmentation
  • In 1942, we had 24,500 municipalities and special
    districts in the United States.
  •   By 1992, that number had more than doubled to
    50,834.
  •   Regions are now governed by an average of 90
    local governments.
  •   It is the control that matters for equity
  •  
  • Zoning
  • Planning
  • Taxation
  • Education
  • Public Services

As many cities are moving quickly towards
becoming majority-minority areas, those same
cities are seeing their political decision making
capacities become less and less
23
Concentrated Poverty
  • Nearly 85 percent of high-poverty neighborhoods
    are located in metropolitan areas
  • Residents of high poverty areas are mostly
    minority
  • Nearly all of the increases in the number of the
    poor in high-poverty neighborhoods has occurred
    in central cities and inner-ring suburbs

24
  • EXAMPLE Concentrated Poverty in the Baltimore
    Region
  • The accompanying map illustrates the high
    concentration of African Americans in Poverty
    (displayed in red) in the Baltimore region
  • The map on the following slide indicates that low
    income housing tax credit projects are further
    concentrating impoverished residents in these
    areas

An example of an approach to a solution not
taking all structuraldynamics into consideration
andcreating problems of its own
25
African American Population Distribution and Low
Income Housing Tax Credit Projects in the
Baltimore Area (Dark Colors Highest
Distribution) (Blue Dots LITC projects)
26
Favored Quarter
  • Has the majority of public infrastructure that
    fuels growth.
  • Has vast majority of job growth.
  • Because of fragmentation, able to wall itself off
    from regions social services
  • Little affordable housing
  • Little or no funding for public transit
  • Wealthy schools with few poor children
  • Etc

27
African American Population Distribution in the
Milwaukee Area in 2000 (Dark Colors Highest
Distribution)
28
Non-White Hispanic Population Distribution in the
Milwaukee Area in 2000 (Dark Colors Highest
Distribution)
29
Median Household Income in the Milwaukee Area in
2000 (Dark Colors Highest Incomes)
30
Spatial Racism
  • Not always obvious/directly related to income
  • Example In many cities African-Americans making
    more than 60,000 a year still live in less
    advantaged neighborhoods than whites making under
    30,000 a year
  • The neighborhood gap is actually growing larger
    for the most affluent blacks and Hispanics
    (compared to whites with similar incomes) than
    for those close to the poverty level.

31
SUBURBANIZATION
  • 1950 60 of Americans in metropolitan areas
    lived in central cities
  • 1990 over 70 of Americans in metropolitan
    areas live in the suburbs
  • Suburbs overwhelmingly white
  • However

32
SUBURBANIZATION
  • Both the number and proportion of the poor living
    in suburbs has increased steadily. In 1970 only
    20.5 percent of the nation's poor lived in
    suburbs. By 2000, that had grown to 35.9 percent.
  • Minorities concentrated in first-ring suburbs,
    close to decaying cities
  • People now commuting from suburb to suburb for
    work, school, and play. A growing population that
    has little to no connection to the central city
    at the heart of the metropolitan area.
  • The number of "rich" suburbs--those with per
    capita incomes above 125 percent of the
    region's--has also increased.
  • Exclusionary zoning
  • source Census 2000

33
(No Transcript)
34
Regionalism A possible structural approach to
spatial racism
  • Economic and political power increasingly
    function at regional levels
  • Regionalism represents an opportunity to
    reconstruct policies and institutions
  • Regional policies influence communities and
    neighborhoods
  • Can affect multi-faceted change

35
The Need to Think in Terms of Opportunity
  • Opportunity structures are the resources and
    services that contribute to stability and
    advancement
  • Fair access to opportunity structures is limited
    by segregation, concentration of poverty,
    fragmentation, and sprawl in our regions for
    low-income households and families of color
  • Because opportunity structures exist as a web a
    multi-faceted, equity-centered approach is needed
  • Housing can been seen as a central spoke in the
    opportunity wheel

36
(No Transcript)
37
Opportunity-Based Housing
  • Affordable housing must be deliberately and
    intelligently connected to high performing
    school, sustaining employment, necessary
    transportation infrastructure, childcare, and
    institutions that facilitate civic and political
    activity
  • Housing is a component of a larger set of
    interrelated
  • structures that are both affected by housing and
    have impacts for the attainment of safe, stable
    housing.

38
Regionalism Challenges
  • Understand differences and determine a way to
    work together through alliances and
    collaborations
  • Develop policy options that local communities can
    choose to suit their individual needs
  • Make regionalism real and compelling to
    community-based groups
  • Confront race as a significant factor in
    understanding policy issues

39
Stuck on the Individual
  • Why do policymakers prefer to narrowly frame
    persistent racial and ethnic disparities as
    individual and community problems?
  • 1) They resonate with our deep beliefs about
    success and failure
  • - personal responsibility
  • - meritocracy
  • (basketball/gym analogy)
  • -where do these beliefs come from?

40
Stuck on the Individual
2) We overestimate our civil rights
gains. -persistent disparities, etc 3) We
are often reluctant to acknowledge the legacies
of race -We often fail to acknowledge the ways
that race has been a fundamental axis of
social organization in the US - want to be
colorblind
41
Stuck on the Individual
4) We often prefer to address symptoms rather
than the roots of social problems -can be
overwhelming to view the complicated,
entrenched nature of these disparities, rather
than focusing on fixing them individually 5) W
e are still struggling with the meanings of
race, racism, justice, and equality
42
Crisis
  • During times of crisis, there is increased
    fluidity in our structures and a greater
    potential for change
  • Important time to effect change
  • However, part of the focus of our change must be
    to create structures that are more responsive
    even during times of non-crisis

43
Next Steps in an Equity Agenda Looking for the
longest lever
  • Use a structural framework when looking at
    problems
  • What issue has the potential to have a
    beneficial effect on other issues
  • Be willing to question the views we are holding
  • Methods of change we have been investing in that
    arent working
  • Methods of change that resonate with our beliefs
    of how change should be able to be created
    instead of looking at other ways change could be
    created
  • Must remain open to critique and fallibility
  • Look for as of-yet untapped coalitions,
    non-traditional groups working for social change
  • Business community gt Chicago Metro 2020
  • Rise of faith-based organizations engaging with
    spatial racism

44
Next Steps in an Equity Agenda Setting Goals
  • Transactional vs. Transformational Change
  • Can we always tell which is which?
  • How do we envision transformational change when
    our desires and concepts of justice/equity are
    often formed by the structures we exist within?
  • How do people with privilege seek to challenge
    that very privilege?
  • Transformational change runs the risk of being
    irrelevant/transactional change runs the risk of
    always being reactionary

45
Next Steps in an Equity Agenda Setting Goals
  • Big problems do not necessarily require big
    solutions.
  • Strategic transactional change can also be
    transformative.
  • School funding policy reform
  • Constrain sprawl through modified policies and
    laws (Oregon, Washington, Utah)
  • Laws/policies which recognize disparate outcomes
    rather than acknowledging only intentional racist
    actions.
  • Opportunity Based Housing (Mi, Wisk.)

46
Approaching Change
  • We need transformative thinking to combat
    structural racism. We do not need to increase our
    efforts in directions that have shown little
    success in the past, instead we need to find a
    new approach. This approach should consider the
    structures that are creating and perpetuating the
    inequity, and work to reform them for lasting
    change.
  • Including people where they once were excluded is
    a step in the right direction, but it is not
    enough. We need to examine the policies and
    politics which led to their exclusion in the
    first place.
  • What does democracy mean?

47
Democracy
  • Full and meaningful participation should be
    guaranteed for all citizens of the region, so
    that these disparities are redressed and we can
    strive for a genuine democracy
  • What is needed is a model that promotes racial
    equity at the regional level but does not
    sacrifice the political power base, communities,
    and social institutions of people of color

48
Summary
  • Segregation persists at extremely high levels
    and process towards integration is proceeding
    slowly or in same case not proceeding at all
  • Racial and economic disparities persist in
    every life-area, including access to affordable
    housing, equal educational opportunities,
    sustaining employment, access to health care, and
    effective, affordable transportation

49
Summary
  • We need to use a structural racism lens to
    understand the meaning of these disparities and
    move beyond our focus on prejudice, intent,
    personal actions (not discarding that view, but
    making it more holistic)
  • A SR Lens helps us understand the interactions
    between institutions and between institutions and
    people. It is necessary to look at
    metropolitan-wide strategies if we truly want to
    deconcentrate poverty, integrate our
    neighborhoods and schools, and equalize wealth
    and opportunity

50
Summary
  • We must expand our notion of what equality
    means, taking into account access to opportunity.
    We must offer solutions that do not seek to
    affect transactional change, but transformational
    change and stop pursuing avenues which arent
    yielding measurable results.

51
Visit Our Website www.kirwaninstitute.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com