Title: Prof' john a' powell
1The Longest Lever Philanthropy Through a
Structural Lens
- Prof. john a. powell
- Kirwan Institute for the Study of
- Race Ethnicity
- 15 October 2004
2Overview
- Race, Racism, Disparities and Structures
- What is Structural Racism?
- Globalization and Structures
- Spatial Racism
- housing and opportunity through a structural
lens - Regionalism a structural response to
fragmentation and segregation - Framing the problem, Understand the solutions
- Maximizing our ability to create social change
3 The problem of equality is so tenacious
because, despite its virtues and attributes,
America is deeply racist and its democracy is
flawed both economically and socially justice
for Black people cannot be achieved without
radical changes in the structure of our society
exposing evils that are rooted deeply in the
whole structure of our society. It reveals
systemic rather than superficial flaws and
suggests that radical reconstruction of society
itself is the real issue to be faced Rev.
Martin Luther King, Jr.
4Race and Racism
- Race
- Biological determinism vs social construction
- Constituted through racial hierarchy
- Race does not exist in an objective sense, it is
created by/through social/cultural structures
5Disparities Past Present
- Racial disparities exist across the US and the
world. - These disparities were historically established
and reinforced through inscription in the laws
and practices along lines of gender, race, class,
religion, etc. - In the U.S. and much of the world, todays
policies and laws are supposedly neutral, yet
groups are still experiencing disparities (in
some cases increasing) - Racial attitudes have been improving even when
conditions have not.
6Structural Racism
- We have seen a move away from legal racism and
personal prejudice to a racial hierarchy that is
enforced through institutional/structural means. - Example de jure segregation ? de facto
segregation
7The Source of Disparities
- How do we understand these disparities if they
are not explained by personal discrimination or
explicit laws and policies? When do disparities
matter? - Three sources
- Biology Much less prevalent today, but the
common 19th century theory of racial, ethnic, and
gender inferiority. - Individuals Culture Idea that individuals
alone can (and should) rise above their
conditions of poverty, and the idea of a
defective culture of poverty. - Structures Institutions States that even
within neutral arrangements and without racist
actors, disparities can still exist.
8Disparities Civil Rights Era Today
- The typical Black family had 60 as much income
as a white family in 1968, but only 58 as much
in 2002. - Black infants are almost two-and-a-half-times as
likely as white infants to die before age one a
greater gap than in 1970. - At the slow rate that the Black-white poverty gap
has been narrowing since 1968, it would take
until 2152, to close. - African Americans had 55 cents in 1968 and only
57 cents in 2001. At this pace, it would take
Blacks 581 years to get the remaining 43 cents. - While white homeownership has jumped from 65 to
75 since 1970, Black homeownership has only
risen from 42 to 48. At this rate, it would
take 1,664 years to close the homeownership gap
about 55 generations.
Source State Of The Dream 2004 (United for a
Fair Economy)
9Median Household incomes of racial and ethnic
groups (national)
SOURCE LEWIS MUMFORD CENTER 1990, 2000 CENSUS
10Disparities A matrix of oppression
- Because of the interaction between racism and
patriarchy, disparities can be particularly
egregious for poor women of color - Single Mothers Living in Concentrated Poverty
In 2000, 49 of families in concentrated poverty
neighborhoods consist of female headed single
parent families. In comparison female headed
single parent families make up only 10 of all
families nationwide. Source Urban Institute
and U.S. Census Bureau
11Understanding Structural Racism
- Theoretically neutral policies and practices can
function in racist ways. Laws and institutions
need not be explicitly racist in order to
disempower communities of color they need only
to perpetuate unequal historic conditions. - These policies and practices are not neutral
however, and as a result the burdens are
distributed unevenly. - We are increasingly moving toward racial
hierarchy without racist actors.
12Structural Racism (SR) Approach
- The SR approach proposes evaluating the fairness
of structures or institutional arrangements by
how they function, and in their relationships
with other structures/institutions. - Look at results, not necessarily intentions
- How do they affect human agency?
13Globalization
- Shifting the economic unit increasingly it is
regions (city-states) that are engaged with
other regions - need to be careful not to frame the debate in
terms of scarcity and a winner-loser competition
either intra- or inter-regionally -
-
14Globalization
- Technology and economic trends are creating a
more integrated, dynamic and interconnected world
and a "global economy." - Economic growth without social and cultural
justice cannot be our idea of development. - Development should be measured in terms of the
quality of human life. -
-
15Globalization
- Amartya Sen notes that we must also be careful
not to give exclusive attention to means (ie
income, wealth, etc) but to the ends desired and
the capabilities required to pursue those ends. - When we look at things within our framework of
structures and opportunities, we can focus on
those actions that maximize access to opportunity.
16Spatial Racism Using a Structural Racism
approach to understand segregation its causes
and effects
Space is how race plays out in American
society-and the key to solving inequities in
housing, transportation, education, and health
careSprawl is the new face of Jim
Crow. john powell
17Spatial Racism The Civil Rights Agenda for the
21st Century
- The government plays a central role in the
arrangement of space and opportunities. - Not neutral or natural
-
- Social and racial inequities are geographically
inscribed - There is a polarization between the rich and the
poor that is directly related to the areas in
which they live.
18Spatial Racism Not Natural or Neutral
- Civil Rights movement and the urbanization of
people of color occurred in tandem during
post-WWII America. - While very real gains were being made against
blatant exclusionary practices and a culture of
discrimination, groundwork was being laid for
persistent structural racism. - Blacks moving to cities for opportunities, while
opportunities leave the cities to the suburbs - Same pattern beginning to repeat in first-ring
suburbs today - Latino/as also dealing with suburbanization
19Segregation Today
- Persists at very high levels for
African-Americans - At 65 (75 in many major metropolitan areas)
- Improving at an extremely slow pace
- Worst in Northern cities
- Detroit, Milwaukee, New York, Chicago
- Southern cities more likely to be organized on
county level
20Sprawl in the United States
Suburban population
- Suburban population doubled
- between 1950 and 1970
1950
1970
Suburbs
Central Cities
- By 2000 the suburbs
- contained over 2/3 of the
- metropolitan population
- Only 1/3 remained in the
- central cities
21- By pushing good jobs, stable housing, and
educational opportunities further into the
suburbs, sprawl creates areas of the central city
that are locked off from access to meaningful
opportunities.
22Fragmentation
- In 1942, we had 24,500 municipalities and special
districts in the United States. - By 1992, that number had more than doubled to
50,834. - Regions are now governed by an average of 90
local governments. - It is the control that matters for equity
-
- Zoning
- Planning
- Taxation
- Education
- Public Services
As many cities are moving quickly towards
becoming majority-minority areas, those same
cities are seeing their political decision making
capacities become less and less
23Concentrated Poverty
- Nearly 85 percent of high-poverty neighborhoods
are located in metropolitan areas -
- Residents of high poverty areas are mostly
minority - Nearly all of the increases in the number of the
poor in high-poverty neighborhoods has occurred
in central cities and inner-ring suburbs
24- EXAMPLE Concentrated Poverty in the Baltimore
Region - The accompanying map illustrates the high
concentration of African Americans in Poverty
(displayed in red) in the Baltimore region - The map on the following slide indicates that low
income housing tax credit projects are further
concentrating impoverished residents in these
areas
An example of an approach to a solution not
taking all structuraldynamics into consideration
andcreating problems of its own
25African American Population Distribution and Low
Income Housing Tax Credit Projects in the
Baltimore Area (Dark Colors Highest
Distribution) (Blue Dots LITC projects)
26Favored Quarter
- Has the majority of public infrastructure that
fuels growth. - Has vast majority of job growth.
- Because of fragmentation, able to wall itself off
from regions social services - Little affordable housing
- Little or no funding for public transit
- Wealthy schools with few poor children
- Etc
27African American Population Distribution in the
Milwaukee Area in 2000 (Dark Colors Highest
Distribution)
28Non-White Hispanic Population Distribution in the
Milwaukee Area in 2000 (Dark Colors Highest
Distribution)
29Median Household Income in the Milwaukee Area in
2000 (Dark Colors Highest Incomes)
30Spatial Racism
- Not always obvious/directly related to income
- Example In many cities African-Americans making
more than 60,000 a year still live in less
advantaged neighborhoods than whites making under
30,000 a year - The neighborhood gap is actually growing larger
for the most affluent blacks and Hispanics
(compared to whites with similar incomes) than
for those close to the poverty level.
31SUBURBANIZATION
- 1950 60 of Americans in metropolitan areas
lived in central cities - 1990 over 70 of Americans in metropolitan
areas live in the suburbs - Suburbs overwhelmingly white
- However
32SUBURBANIZATION
- Both the number and proportion of the poor living
in suburbs has increased steadily. In 1970 only
20.5 percent of the nation's poor lived in
suburbs. By 2000, that had grown to 35.9 percent.
- Minorities concentrated in first-ring suburbs,
close to decaying cities - People now commuting from suburb to suburb for
work, school, and play. A growing population that
has little to no connection to the central city
at the heart of the metropolitan area. - The number of "rich" suburbs--those with per
capita incomes above 125 percent of the
region's--has also increased. - Exclusionary zoning
- source Census 2000
33(No Transcript)
34Regionalism A possible structural approach to
spatial racism
- Economic and political power increasingly
function at regional levels - Regionalism represents an opportunity to
reconstruct policies and institutions - Regional policies influence communities and
neighborhoods - Can affect multi-faceted change
35The Need to Think in Terms of Opportunity
- Opportunity structures are the resources and
services that contribute to stability and
advancement - Fair access to opportunity structures is limited
by segregation, concentration of poverty,
fragmentation, and sprawl in our regions for
low-income households and families of color - Because opportunity structures exist as a web a
multi-faceted, equity-centered approach is needed - Housing can been seen as a central spoke in the
opportunity wheel
36(No Transcript)
37Opportunity-Based Housing
- Affordable housing must be deliberately and
intelligently connected to high performing
school, sustaining employment, necessary
transportation infrastructure, childcare, and
institutions that facilitate civic and political
activity - Housing is a component of a larger set of
interrelated - structures that are both affected by housing and
have impacts for the attainment of safe, stable
housing.
38Regionalism Challenges
- Understand differences and determine a way to
work together through alliances and
collaborations - Develop policy options that local communities can
choose to suit their individual needs - Make regionalism real and compelling to
community-based groups - Confront race as a significant factor in
understanding policy issues
39Stuck on the Individual
- Why do policymakers prefer to narrowly frame
persistent racial and ethnic disparities as
individual and community problems? - 1) They resonate with our deep beliefs about
success and failure - - personal responsibility
- - meritocracy
- (basketball/gym analogy)
- -where do these beliefs come from?
40Stuck on the Individual
2) We overestimate our civil rights
gains. -persistent disparities, etc 3) We
are often reluctant to acknowledge the legacies
of race -We often fail to acknowledge the ways
that race has been a fundamental axis of
social organization in the US - want to be
colorblind
41Stuck on the Individual
4) We often prefer to address symptoms rather
than the roots of social problems -can be
overwhelming to view the complicated,
entrenched nature of these disparities, rather
than focusing on fixing them individually 5) W
e are still struggling with the meanings of
race, racism, justice, and equality
42Crisis
- During times of crisis, there is increased
fluidity in our structures and a greater
potential for change - Important time to effect change
- However, part of the focus of our change must be
to create structures that are more responsive
even during times of non-crisis
43Next Steps in an Equity Agenda Looking for the
longest lever
- Use a structural framework when looking at
problems - What issue has the potential to have a
beneficial effect on other issues - Be willing to question the views we are holding
- Methods of change we have been investing in that
arent working - Methods of change that resonate with our beliefs
of how change should be able to be created
instead of looking at other ways change could be
created - Must remain open to critique and fallibility
- Look for as of-yet untapped coalitions,
non-traditional groups working for social change - Business community gt Chicago Metro 2020
- Rise of faith-based organizations engaging with
spatial racism
44Next Steps in an Equity Agenda Setting Goals
- Transactional vs. Transformational Change
- Can we always tell which is which?
- How do we envision transformational change when
our desires and concepts of justice/equity are
often formed by the structures we exist within? - How do people with privilege seek to challenge
that very privilege? - Transformational change runs the risk of being
irrelevant/transactional change runs the risk of
always being reactionary
45Next Steps in an Equity Agenda Setting Goals
- Big problems do not necessarily require big
solutions. - Strategic transactional change can also be
transformative. - School funding policy reform
- Constrain sprawl through modified policies and
laws (Oregon, Washington, Utah) - Laws/policies which recognize disparate outcomes
rather than acknowledging only intentional racist
actions. - Opportunity Based Housing (Mi, Wisk.)
46Approaching Change
- We need transformative thinking to combat
structural racism. We do not need to increase our
efforts in directions that have shown little
success in the past, instead we need to find a
new approach. This approach should consider the
structures that are creating and perpetuating the
inequity, and work to reform them for lasting
change. - Including people where they once were excluded is
a step in the right direction, but it is not
enough. We need to examine the policies and
politics which led to their exclusion in the
first place. - What does democracy mean?
47Democracy
- Full and meaningful participation should be
guaranteed for all citizens of the region, so
that these disparities are redressed and we can
strive for a genuine democracy - What is needed is a model that promotes racial
equity at the regional level but does not
sacrifice the political power base, communities,
and social institutions of people of color
48Summary
- Segregation persists at extremely high levels
and process towards integration is proceeding
slowly or in same case not proceeding at all -
- Racial and economic disparities persist in
every life-area, including access to affordable
housing, equal educational opportunities,
sustaining employment, access to health care, and
effective, affordable transportation
49Summary
- We need to use a structural racism lens to
understand the meaning of these disparities and
move beyond our focus on prejudice, intent,
personal actions (not discarding that view, but
making it more holistic) - A SR Lens helps us understand the interactions
between institutions and between institutions and
people. It is necessary to look at
metropolitan-wide strategies if we truly want to
deconcentrate poverty, integrate our
neighborhoods and schools, and equalize wealth
and opportunity
50Summary
- We must expand our notion of what equality
means, taking into account access to opportunity.
We must offer solutions that do not seek to
affect transactional change, but transformational
change and stop pursuing avenues which arent
yielding measurable results.
51Visit Our Website www.kirwaninstitute.org